And (the last) one more patch to make
'buildworld' successfull:
Index: usr.sbin/wlconfig/wlconfig.c
===
RCS file: /store/CVS/src/usr.sbin/wlconfig/wlconfig.c,v
retrieving revision 1.8
diff -b -u -r1.8 wlconfig.c
---
cvsup'ed 1 hour ago
cc -O -pipe -I. -Dyylval=pcap_lval -DHAVE_SYS_IOCCOM_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_SOCKIO_H=1
-DHAVE_ETHER_HOSTTON=1 -DHAVE_STRERROR=1 -DHAVE_SOCKADDR_SA_LEN=1 -DLBL_ALIGN=1
-DINET6 -I/usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap
-I/usr/src/lib/libpcap/../../contrib/libpcap/lbl
The reason why ntp is interesting is that we compare the received data
with our unpredictable local clock. It is the result of this comparison
which is good entropy bits.
Is the resolution of thermal sensors on many new motherboards and
CPU high enough to get thermal randomness?
Peter
--
[...]
From: Archie Cobbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Julian Elischer writes:
i was working on integration of Ethernet TAP driver and NETGRAPH
and found strange thing. the problem is that NG_ETHER nodes do not
detach correctly when interface is gone. i was taking a very quick
look at
On 19-Jul-00 Peter Dufault wrote:
Is the resolution of thermal sensors on many new motherboards and
CPU high enough to get thermal randomness?
The voltage sensors have some noise too (maybe not enough).
--
Steve O'Hara-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sohara.webhop.net/ A
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
On 19-Jul-00 Peter Dufault wrote:
Is the resolution of thermal sensors on many new motherboards and
CPU high enough to get thermal randomness?
The voltage sensors have some noise too (maybe not enough).
Fan speed too.
Leif
Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO writes:
again, here is one of the millions of possible patches that works for me :)
*** ng_ether.c.old Tue Jul 18 21:17:54 2000
--- ng_ether.c Tue Jul 18 21:48:46 2000
***
*** 293,298
--- 293,299
bzero(priv, sizeof(*priv));
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Leidinger writes:
: systems which have a more or less precise clock attached (e.g. GPS or
: atomic clocks which sync the system clock via nptd)? And what are the
: numbers for this solution (for those people which are interested in
: numbers to be their own
I am using fwtk-2.1 on a firewall, and with the latest builds, fetch
seems to have changed behaviors such that it no longer works with it.
I have FTP_PROXY set to "red:9696"
the difference in behavior seems that older versions of fetch would
send a USER command like this:
USER [EMAIL
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes:
Another good source would be if you had a Cesium clock and a GPS
receiver. The delay due to atmospherics is another good source of
random data. This varies +- 25ns and is highly locale dependent. One
can measure this variance down to the
[ A whole bunch of sane stuff removed ]
It certainly would be better than nothing and would be a decent source
of randomness. It would be my expectation that if tests were run to
measure this randomness and the crypto random tests were applied,
we'd find a fairly good source.
The
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
: A geiger counter and a smoke-detector would be *so much* cheaper
: and give more bits per second :-)
Agreed. And a lot less hassle. A *LOT* less hassle. :-)
: It certainly would be better than nothing and would be a decent source
: of
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mark Murray writes:
: The randomness is good, no doubt; I worry about how accessible that
: randomness is to an attacker?
That's a good thing to worry about.
: If the attacker is on your computer (he us a user, say), he might know
: a lot about the current frequency
Is it just me, or is make release broken?
I've been getting a bomb-out whilst making the boot crunch (in /bin/sh, I
think. Its at home, I'm not.) I haven't seen anybody kvetching (I *do* read
current...) Just to sanity check, I ran a 4.0 make release last night, that
worked just fine.
To
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mark Murray writes:
[ A whole bunch of sane stuff removed ]
It certainly would be better than nothing and would be a decent source
of randomness. It would be my expectation that if tests were run to
measure this randomness and the crypto random tests were
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Dufault writes:
: The reason why ntp is interesting is that we compare the received data
: with our unpredictable local clock. It is the result of this comparison
: which is good entropy bits.
:
: Is the resolution of thermal sensors on many new
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
Is it just me, or is make release broken?
I've been getting a bomb-out whilst making the boot crunch (in /bin/sh, I
think. Its at home, I'm not.) I haven't seen anybody kvetching (I *do* read
current...) Just to sanity check, I ran a
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000, Tony Johnson wrote:
One thing that I just noticed on the python mailing list is a portable way
of retrieving an ip addy. Why not start using eth0 (unfortunately as they
do in Linuxland) eth1 ... For nic cards instead of fxp0 for an intel,
etc...
The fxp0 way is
Hi! There,
My trafshow doesn't work. Whenever I tried to run trafshow, it gave me
error message says, "trafshow: : Device not configured" I check my
Kernel configuration file, a line
"device bpf 4 #Berkeley packet filter"
is there and device drivers bpf0,
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Sam Xie wrote:
Hi! There,
My trafshow doesn't work. Whenever I tried to run trafshow, it gave me
error message says, "trafshow: : Device not configured" I check my
Kernel configuration file, a line
Fallout from the malloc.conf changes. tcpdump has
Hi,
I have the following network:
A (FreeBSD-CURRENT) - ethernet - B (Linux) - ppp - Internet
192.168.1.2 192.168.1.1
I have enabled IP Masq. in 'B' and set it as the default gateway
for A, issuing the command below:
[A] $ ifconfig add default 192.168.1.1
When the
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Sam Xie wrote:
Hi! There,
My trafshow doesn't work. Whenever I tried to run trafshow, it gave me
error message says, "trafshow: : Device not configured" I check my
Kernel configuration file, a line
"device bpf 4 #Berkeley packet
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Elias Athanasopoulos wrote:
Hi,
I have the following network:
A (FreeBSD-CURRENT) - ethernet - B (Linux) - ppp - Internet
192.168.1.2 192.168.1.1
I have enabled IP Masq. in 'B' and set it as the default gateway
for A, issuing the command
The trick here is to actually measure the quality of our entropy.
I have asked Markm to provide us with some kernel option which can
be used to get a copy of the entropy so we can study the quality
off it.
I have something that is _very_ crude, and definitely not
commitworthy, but it is up
: If the attacker is on your computer (he us a user, say), he might know
: a lot about the current frequency of your xtal. He can also get the same
: (remote) time offsets as you. What does that give him? Not much, but it
: could reduce the bits that he needs to guess. By how much? I don't
:
If the attacker is on your computer (he us a user, say), he might know
a lot about the current frequency of your xtal. He can also get the same
(remote) time offsets as you. What does that give him? Not much, but it
could reduce the bits that he needs to guess. By how much? I don't
know.
On Wed, Jul 19, 2000 at 02:38:14PM -0700, Doug White wrote:
[A] $ ifconfig add default 192.168.1.1
Try 'route' instead of 'ifconfig' and you might have better luck.
Oops! Sorry, it was a typo. :-( The command I used is 'route'.
I have no problem with my routing table (which I can show
=== libexec/rtld-elf
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/libexec.
***
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
=== libexec/rtld-elf
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp:No such file or directory
*** Error code 1
I think we need to copy 'cp' in installworld as well.
Could people try this out and see whether this solves any problems with
detection of Zip drives?
You might have to add flags=0x01 to ppc to use NIBBLE mode.
If enough people respond I'll try and get this into 4.1-RC.
Nick
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 18 Jul 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
This works nicely in Windows (Outlook Express), but I'd like to try using
the same key with openssl to generate crypted (to myself) or signed
messages.
I can export the key as a .cer, .p7b or .pfx, but openssl seems to want it
in .pem format.
You
No response to this on -stable. The actual error message is:
Disk error 0x1 (lba=0x7004c)
No /boot/loader
Disk geometry stuffup, or a 'real' disk error.
Also, on a whim I decided to try running /boot/loader. I got a
It's not a FreeBSD executable (obviously enough), so you
On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Mike Smith wrote:
No response to this on -stable. The actual error message is:
Disk error 0x1 (lba=0x7004c)
No /boot/loader
Disk geometry stuffup, or a 'real' disk error.
Well, I put my money on real disk error, but only because it
vindicates my
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== libexec/rtld-elf
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp:No such file or directory
^
|
Why is the
* John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000719 17:45] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=== libexec/rtld-elf
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
chflags noschg /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1.old
cp -p /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 08:46:40AM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
That theory is not correct, I have seen multiple Alpha machines reporting
buffer underruns as well. No ATA disk in sight there..
I get the same thing on AS4000/AS4100 machines running Tru64. I'm
inclined to believe it's a design flaw
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I needed to add 'cp' to src/Makefile.inc1, Marcel explained it to me
Oh, so it was "cp" that wasn't found, I take it. We should change
the message in make so it's more like what shells say ("command not
found").
but I'm sorry I did, -current is terribly broken. I
* John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000719 18:32] wrote:
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
I needed to add 'cp' to src/Makefile.inc1, Marcel explained it to me
Oh, so it was "cp" that wasn't found, I take it. We should change
the message in make so it's more like what shells say ("command not
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hellmuth Michaelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the process of tracing down the problem of the kernel panic when booting
a kernel with pcvt enabled, i tried to compile a kernel without the -O
option to gcc and got this compile failure (sources from 18.7.2000 9:00
39 matches
Mail list logo
