Mark Murray wrote:
[...]
> > > Asynchonous reseeding _improves_ the situation; the attacker cannot force
> > > it to any degree of accuracy, and if he has the odds stacked heavily against
> > > him that each 256-bits of output will have an associated reseed, it makes
> > > his job pretty damn diff
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 08:29:23AM -0400, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> The patch does work for client side. I have verified that I can connect
> to a windows server using chap v2, but I forgot to do something for
> server. Shouldn't take me long. If you need the server part before
> Brian gets back,
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
> 1. The overhead will probably be insignificant. One doesn't
>use such vast amounts of random numbers.
True, but the effect on slow CPUs for a single read may be signfificant.
We'll have to see.
> 2. At least the generator gate can be opti
According to Neil Blakey-Milner:
> I've had this too. Never have figured what it was about, but it
> happened only in X, where I use gnome.
/me has the very same problem, running Gnome as well.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5
On Mon, 24 Jul 2000, Viren R.Shah wrote:
> >> > [vshah@vorpal] /etc> perl
> >> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> >> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> >> > LC_ALL = (unset),
> >> > LC_CTYPE = "en_US",
> >> > LANG = (unset)
> >> >
Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Jeroen C. van Gelderen wrote:
>
> > > Well, a simple scheme which doesn't seem to suffer from any of the
> > > vulnerabilities discussed in the schneier papers is to accumulate entropy
> > > in a pool, and only return output when the pool is full. i.
Blasted Outhouse mailer. Lets try again.
-Original Message-
From: Gray, David W.
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2000 11:15 AM
To: 'FreeBSD Current list'
Subject: Recent make world breakages
Not to exacerbate a sore subject, but...
>From what I'm seeing go by, the intention is that a current
> -On [2723 07:15], John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >Some developers just aren't being careful enough. The biggest problem
> >is they don't restore their systems to a 100% pristine state before
> >they test.
>
> Think we could come up with a make cleanworld like target which does
>
> "Neil" == Neil Blakey-Milner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Neil> On Sat 2000-07-22 (00:10), Doug Barton wrote:
>> > I installed a recent snapshot of -current (a week ago) and I keep
>> > getting the following warnings:
>> >
>> > [vshah@vorpal] /etc> perl
>> > perl: warning: Setting loc
I found on my computer that a ds1 builtin soundcard of type 10 (found in
the file) will not init correctly unless the same 400ms wait is applied to
it that is applied to type 8 cards. I have included a patch to make this
happen. The patch was created against a -STABLE from today, but should not
be
-On [2723 07:15], John Polstra ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Some developers just aren't being careful enough. The biggest problem
>is they don't restore their systems to a 100% pristine state before
>they test.
Think we could come up with a make cleanworld like target which does
just that?
't
Not to exacerbate a sore subject, but...
>From what I'm seeing go by, the intention is that a current make world is
supposed to work from -stable. OK, what about make release?
The reason I am asking, is that I'm actually running current on a laptop,
and for various reasons, its far easier to be
Strange but true,
i cvsupped a tree yesterday (and another on another machine today) and on
both machines a pcvt-configured kernel now works again and does not panic
any longer (same config files & hint files).
hellmuth
--
Hellmuth MichaelisTel +49 40 55 97
On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 01:58:47PM +0900, Seigo Tanimura wrote:
> Did you see this log?
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 02:53:11 -0700 (PDT),
> "David E. O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
I'll take a look at this on Monday. Thanks! for the bug reports -- just
what I wanted to hear before I thought abou
On Sat, Jul 22, 2000 at 02:49:02PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> Did we bump the libc version number when the strtofflags/fflagstostr
> functions went in?
Nope, the added functionality didn't change any of the existing
interfaces, so it no longer meets our requirements for a shlib version
bump
On Sat 2000-07-22 (00:10), Doug Barton wrote:
> > I installed a recent snapshot of -current (a week ago) and I keep
> > getting the following warnings:
> >
> > [vshah@vorpal] /etc> perl
> > perl: warning: Setting locale failed.
> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> >
On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 03:06:34PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Stefan `Sec` Zehl writes:
> >With the current approach it has a 256bits key. This is, in my eyes, not
> >good. Although yarrow is nice, It's suited for any kind of key
> >generation.
>
> The first
Adam wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Jul 2000, Trevor Johnson wrote:
>
> >> > Are the fixed in Netscape 4.74 bugs not critical for release?
> >>
> >> Who knows? I don't know of any changelog for Netscape.
> >
> >The release notes are at
> >http://home.netscape.com/eng/mozilla/4.7/relnotes/unix-4.74.html#what
18 matches
Mail list logo
