MAKEDEV broken

Hi It looks like a function got left out of MAKEDEV. This seems to fix it: Index: /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/MAKEDEV,v retrieving revision 1.268 diff -u -d -r1.268 MAKEDEV --- /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

On 2000-Aug-18 13:41:29 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >The memory resource of the card might not be allocated properly. Could >you apply the following patch and report what your kernel print? ed0: conf_maddr = 0xcc000. ed0: tag(mem_res) = 1, handle(mem_res) = 0xc00cc000. ed0: f

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

On Fri, 18 Aug 2000 09:56:56 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Peter> On 2000-Aug-17 16:55:57 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, >> Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >> >> peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: >

Problems with XFree86

Hello, I am having problems getting XFree86 to run under a recent version of -current and was hoping that someone might be able to help me to figure out what that problem is. At this point I very close to frustration with this process, so might be overlooking something obvious. Here is the situa

Re: LINT doesn't compile

Poul-Henning Kamp writes: > linking kernel > umodem.o: In function `umodem_set_line_coding': > umodem.o(.text+0xe6a): undefined reference to `memcmp' Somebody remind me again why we don't make memcmp(), memset(), and memmove() available in the kernel? Seems silly, especially since we have things

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > archie> But why is sysinstall going to active mode? I *know* FTP passive > archie> was selected.. > > This is just because ftpPassive() is called from ftpGet(). > > ftpGet() > check_passive() > ftpPassive() > > Further more, if

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > It seems -CURRENT's libftpio.c always set passive flag according to > > environment variable FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. Then, PASV/PORT selection > > obeys only FTP_PASSIVE_MODE and direction of sysinstall is ignored. > > Does this patch fix your problem? > > archie> Don't know

Off topic question regarding Digital River, ftp.cdrom.com,ftp.freebsd.org, etc.

Hi, sorry for this somewhat off topic question, but I felt that the people "In the know" would probably be here. I was doing some traceroutes to determine the best ftp mirror to retrieve my favorite OS from, and noticed some changes in the way the servers are set up. I don't remember reading any

Re: LINT doesn't compile

< said: > Somebody remind me again why we don't make memcmp(), memset(), > and memmove() available in the kernel? To keep the compiler from pessimizing them. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] | O Siem / The fires o

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

> On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 13:29:27 -0700 (PDT) > Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: archie> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > > It seems -CURRENT's libftpio.c always set passive flag according to > > environment variable FTP_PASSIVE_MODE. Then, PASV/PORT selection > > obeys only FTP_PASSIVE_MODE

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

On 2000-Aug-17 16:55:57 +0900, Seigo Tanimura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, > Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > >peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: >peter.jeremy> ed0: failed to clear shared memory at 0 - check configuration > >The probe rou

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > archie> I'm having trouble installing the 5.0-2815-CURRENT snapshot. > archie> The problem seems to be broken behavior in the installer FTP client. > archie> My firewall requires using passive mode. The installer asks the > archie> FTP server for passive mode (using PA

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

> On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 10:23:17 -0700 (PDT) > Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: archie> Hajimu UMEMOTO writes: > archie> I'm having trouble installing the 5.0-2815-CURRENT snapshot. > archie> The problem seems to be broken behavior in the installer FTP client. > archie> My firewal

Re: 5.0 snapshot install problem

> On Wed, 16 Aug 2000 13:31:25 -0700 (PDT) > Archie Cobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: archie> I'm having trouble installing the 5.0-2815-CURRENT snapshot. archie> The problem seems to be broken behavior in the installer FTP client. archie> My firewall requires using passive mode. The in

Re: Patch test & review: vop_stdaccess()

On Thu, 17 Aug 2000, Boris Popov wrote: > On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > Please test and review this patch: > > > > http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch > > Looks fine to me except vop_stdaccess() itself. vop_stdaccess() is badly named. It is not a vop f

Re: Patch test & review: vop_stdaccess()

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Boris Pop ov writes: >On Wed, 16 Aug 2000, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Please test and review this patch: >> >> http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/vop_stdaccess.patch > > Looks fine to me except vop_stdaccess() itself. Since VREAD, >VWRITE and VEXEC bits are caref

Re: Newbusifying ed broke it

On Thu, 17 Aug 2000 15:35:59 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: peter.jeremy> Still not working. It now reports: peter.jeremy> ed0: failed to clear shared memory at 0 - check configuration The probe routine cleared and tested IO port instead of memory. Does the following patch work

Re: Slow ssh throughput with -current

On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 02:09:01PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2000-Aug-10 15:36:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I just noticed a really peculiar network slowdown with -current from > >about a week ago. The machine has two NICs - an old 16-bit SMC card > >(ed0) running 10