THIS NEW AMAZING SOFTWARE TOOL HELPS
YOU FIND OUT ALMOST ANYTHING ABOUT ANYONE -
CLICK ON URL BELOW TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE
http://www.canadianwebs.com/hf/syurown/
**
Find out almost EVERYTHING you ever wanted to know about:
Your friends
Yo
Well getting rid of the leftover splimp() didn't clear up the problem. Maybe
we need to move the mtx_init and XL_LOCK up to where the splimp() was.
Later
Mark Hittinger
Earthlink
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body o
Mark Hittinger writes:
> Upon an 'ifconfig xl0' the kernel hangs. If I don't ifconfig xl0 I can
> still use pppd ok.
Well, you're not alone. I note that the same code works fine in my
machine with an fxp.
In if_xl.c at the very beginning of xl_attach() it looks like there is a
leftover splimp(). Bill seems to have replaced all the others with a
LOCK macro. Further down in xl_attach there is a LOCK macro so maybe
we just have to remove that leftover splimp(). Trying that now.
Later
Mark Hittin
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > I thought you could get that information with sched_get_priority_min()
> > > and sched_get_priority_max(). Is t
Upon an 'ifconfig xl0' the kernel hangs. If I don't ifconfig xl0 I can
still use pppd ok.
pcib0: at pcibus 0 on motherboard
pci0: on pcib0
pci0: at 7.3
pci0: at 10.0 irq 11
xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x6400-0x643f irq 10 at device 12.0
on pci0
xl0: Ethernet address: 00:60
I'm getting hard lockups booting a -current kernel supped about 6
hours ago. If I try to boot multiuser, I get a message about the
ethernet interface being configured, and then nothing. If I boot
single user, it comes up fine, and I can configure the NIC. The system
then locks up maybe 10 seconds
At Sat, 14 Oct 2000 13:57:07 -0700 (PDT),
Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I had asked for a 3rd floppy earlier that we could put f/w images and other
> drivers on. Now that we have a mostly loadable system, it strikes me that this
> would be an excellent time to trim down the GENERIC
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> brian 2000/10/14 17:45:19 PDT
>
> Modified files:
> sys/i386/include endian.h
> Log:
> Redefine __word_swap_long, __byte_swap_long and __byte_swap_word
> as inline functions, renaming them to __uint16_swap_uint32,
> __uint8_swap
>
> > > The problem with such an approach is that it's not very user-friendly
> > > to first-time installers who have no idea how to drive the loader.
> >
> > Most of the relevant modules can actually be tried by sysinstall. In the
> > CD case we can just put them on the CDROM. I'd be incline
> The problem with such an approach is that it's not very user-friendly
> to first-time installers who have no idea how to drive the loader.
Most of the relevant modules can actually be tried by sysinstall. In the
CD case we can just put them on the CDROM. I'd be inclined to look for
somewher
> > The problem with such an approach is that it's not very user-friendly
> > to first-time installers who have no idea how to drive the loader.
>
> Most of the relevant modules can actually be tried by sysinstall. In the
> CD case we can just put them on the CDROM. I'd be inclined to look fo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alexander Langer writes:
: Thus spake Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
:
: > The module name should be if_ed. I'll go fix it.
:
: Did you do this already?
:
: And if so, where?
No. I haven't. I just spend a fair amount of time wonking on a
current -current ker
> > Hmm?... my forth is poor, but I don't believe that's the issue. If I
> > understand how the floppies currently work is that it's just like our normal
> > boot loader- we start coming up. If you want to load other drivers or modules
> > (like ispfw), you hit the 'other than Enter' to stop the
> Hmm?... my forth is poor, but I don't believe that's the issue. If I
> understand how the floppies currently work is that it's just like our normal
> boot loader- we start coming up. If you want to load other drivers or modules
> (like ispfw), you hit the 'other than Enter' to stop the loading p
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
>> >
>> > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
>> > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
>> > special thing needing manu
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 10:32:11PM +0200, Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> Backing out an rm'ed file should be as difficult as doing the sequence
> I just tested to make sure:
>
> F=toberemoved.txt
Coming up with the "F" list can be more than just ``ls -R
/home/ncvs/src/contrib/global'' as older versio
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> We've blown out the kern.flp image. Time for me to chop something
> out again, unless there are any other suggestions. :|
Mind if I commit this patch?
Index: dokern.sh
===
> I had asked for a 3rd floppy earlier that we could put f/w images and other
That sounds nice in theory, but somebody needs to write the code which
deals with floppy switching and module loading before this is anything
but yet another request. How's your forth? :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: se
Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> > >
> > > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
> > > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
> > > special thing needing manual inter
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 01:54:39PM -0700, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> We've blown out the kern.flp image. Time for me to chop something
> out again, unless there are any other suggestions. :|
Things the Alpha has already diked out:
ncr
SYS* (not just SYSVMSG)
lpt \
ppi / should not be needed for
> > I had asked for a 3rd floppy earlier that we could put f/w images and other
>
> That sounds nice in theory, but somebody needs to write the code which
> deals with floppy switching and module loading before this is anything
> but yet another request. How's your forth? :)
Hmm?... my forth is
ROTECTED]>
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: -current build report for Sat Oct 14 02:07:34 CDT 2000
>
> Doing nightly build attempt for 5.0-20001014-CURRENT at Sat Oct 14 02:07:34 CDT 2000
> Updating source tree...
> Making
CTED]; Sat, 14 Oct 2000 08:50:54 -0500 (CDT)
(envelope-from root)
Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 08:50:54 -0500 (CDT)
From: USW2 Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: -current build report for Sat Oct 14 02:07:34 CDT 2000
Doing nightly
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 11:16 -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> >
> > Up to now I always thought "the Attic" is something CVS
> > itself takes care of when "cvs rm"ing files. What's that
> > special thing needing manual intervention or special
> > attention you
Could someone please restart them?
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard that a million monkeys at a million keyboards could produce
the Complete Works of Shakespeare; now, thanks to the Internet, we know
this is not true."
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The range of valid priorities has also changed, perhaps
> > > requiring a library versi
Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc?
>
> There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon.
Yes, there has been one for ages. Add: "SENDMAIL_CF= myfile.cf"
to /etc/make.conf, and the sendmail makefiles will build i
On 14-Oct-00 Gerhard Sittig wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>>
>> I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the
>> build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it.
>> I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than
On Sat, Oct 14, 2000 at 05:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> I didn't put it in the Attic when I disconnected it from the
> build in case someone came forward screaming about removing it.
> I figured it was much easier to back out a Makefile commit than
> get things from the Attic back to being
Sometime between October 6 and yesterday (I haven't verified
with today's sources), make installkernel dies with a usage message for
the install command. buildworld and buildkernel go through ok. I believe
the issue is in the order the arguments are called, and if I knew which
.mk file tol
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc?
>
>There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon.
At one time there was a make.conf knob for it, is that not still around?
--
Brandon D. Valentine <[EMAI
On Sat, 14 Oct 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The range of valid priorities has also changed, perhaps
> > requiring a library version bump. The range of valid priorities
> > is not visible outside of the threads lib
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 10:01:59AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building
> global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move
> src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic?
Wow, that is still there. I forgot about
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 12:39 -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
>
> [ ... separate /boot partition ... ]
>
> Since you implied a question...
>
> This is a standard setup for Linux, so Linux people dealing with
> problems with the root file system try and make it work in -stable
> (with no luck). The bes
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:38:34PM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> would that nullfs worked!
It does, modulo remaining bugs which Boris hasnt yet fixed.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've just committed some changes to the threads library
> and would appreciate feedback from anyone running threaded
> applications. They include fixes that -stable could really
> use.
>
> This commit also implements
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Steve Kargl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In revision 1.148 of src/usr.bin/Makefile, the hook for building
> global was removed. This was 3.5 month ago. Is it time to move
> src/contrib/global and src/usr.bin/global into the attic?
Yes, it should have been done a
leifn> Is there a way to make make world use my own sendmail.mc?
There will be soon. I hope to have it in place before or during BSDcon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Tue, 10 Oct 2000, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> The following changes have been made in -CURRENT:
>
> 1. mail.local(8) is no longer installed as a set-user-id binary.
>
>If you are using a /etc/mail/sendmail.cf from the default sendmail.cf
>included with FreeBSD any time after 3.1.
Thus spake Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The module name should be if_ed. I'll go fix it.
Did you do this already?
And if so, where?
I'd love to know.
Alex
--
cat: /home/alex/.sig: No such file or directory
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
41 matches
Mail list logo
