workaround for ex breakage works

2001-01-03 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello Warner, Hello everybody, If you are looking for confirmation that the workaround for the ex/libc related world breakage works then here it is: I have just finished upgrading this way and did not have any problems. Actually, there is an even simpler way: If you already have started a

missing THREAD_UNLOCK in libc?

2001-01-03 Thread Nicolas Souchu
I have some troubleshootings with -current. A program that previously worked (-current of November) with -pthread now fails with an abort and a " in free(): error: recursive call" warning. I think that there may be some errors in my program and I'd like to know what was recently modified in

Re: missing THREAD_UNLOCK in libc?

2001-01-03 Thread Will Andrews
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:54:26PM +0100, Nicolas Souchu wrote: A program that previously worked (-current of November) with -pthread now fails with an abort and a " in free(): error: recursive call" warning. FWIW, WindowMaker 0.62.1 also crashes like this ocassionally (usually when I open a

Re: missing THREAD_UNLOCK in libc?

2001-01-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 05:54:26PM +0100, Nicolas Souchu wrote: A program that previously worked (-current of November) with -pthread now fails with an abort and a " in free(): error: recursive call" warning. I need a copy of this program (source form) to test with. -- -- David ([EMAIL

Make World Success - Good Going

2001-01-03 Thread Thomas D. Dean
I just completed a 'make world' from sources at midnight PST. I made a static vi before starting. I had problems trying to make libc. I got lots of complaints about 'tqh_last' not being members of a structure. But, world completed OK. Must have been something on my system or something I did.

** HEADS UP ** world build known broken

2001-01-03 Thread David O'Brien
The merging of our bits into GCC 2.95.3(RC#1) took a little longer than I suspected. I've got to head to an appointment, so the world will be broken for a little while. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: turning off vga_pci

2001-01-03 Thread Nicolas Souchu
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:13:24AM +1000, Andrew Kenneth Milton wrote: Is there a nice way to stop vga_pci from attaching to my video card, or to allow another driver to attach to it after vga_pci has done its thing? At the moment I'm removing all traces of vga_pci from the Makefile in my

Re: ** HEADS UP ** world build known broken

2001-01-03 Thread Matt Dillon
:The merging of our bits into GCC 2.95.3(RC#1) took a little longer than I :suspected. I've got to head to an appointment, so the world will be broken :for a little while. : ( sky starts to fall as David O takes a coffee break at the local starbucks, remarking merrily to other patrons

Re: ** HEADS UP ** world build known broken

2001-01-03 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:35:48AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote: :The merging of our bits into GCC 2.95.3(RC#1) took a little longer than I :suspected. I've got to head to an appointment, so the world will be broken :for a little while. : ( sky starts to fall as David O takes a coffee

Re: ** HEADS UP ** world build known broken

2001-01-03 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 10:26:30AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: The merging of our bits into GCC 2.95.3(RC#1) took a little longer than I suspected. I've got to head to an appointment, so the world will be broken for a little while. World should be buildable again. Quite sorry for the longer

Re: Cardbus woes

2001-01-03 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
I was mostly trying to push the locks down so that they weren't held during attach and remove. I was using them to protect mostly the kthread state flag in the softc, as well as other variables in the softc. Comments? It seems to me that having a single thread per-softc gives you this

Re: Cardbus woes

2001-01-03 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
It seems to me that having a single thread per-softc gives you this protection without requiring any locks. Other than having to aquire Giant at thread starup (as most code below us is not thread safe yet), I don't see any other locking requirements. I take that back. In pccbb_detach, you need

make buildkernel failed

2001-01-03 Thread John Indra
Dear all... Recent -CURRENT make buildkernel target died with this message: === uscanner cc -O -pipe -g -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE -nostdinc -I- -I.

Can't check with LINT kernel (i386)

2001-01-03 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
URL:http://current.jp.FreeBSD.org/build/i386/LINT/5.0-CURRENT-20010104-JPSNAP.bad According to this logfile, 'cy' (Cyclades serial), 'ar' (Arnet SYNC/570i), 'sr' (RISCom/N2) and 'meteor' (Matrox meteor) requires COMPAT_OLDPCI support which is removed a few weeks before. Can we temporary

Re: Can't check with LINT kernel (i386)

2001-01-03 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote: URL:http://current.jp.FreeBSD.org/build/i386/LINT/5.0-CURRENT-20010104-JPSNAP.bad According to this logfile, 'cy' (Cyclades serial), 'ar' (Arnet SYNC/570i), 'sr' (RISCom/N2) and 'meteor' (Matrox meteor) requires COMPAT_OLDPCI support which is

Re: Can't check with LINT kernel (i386)

2001-01-03 Thread John Hay
URL:http://current.jp.FreeBSD.org/build/i386/LINT/5.0-CURRENT-20010104-JPSNAP.bad According to this logfile, 'cy' (Cyclades serial), 'ar' (Arnet SYNC/570i), 'sr' (RISCom/N2) and 'meteor' (Matrox meteor) requires COMPAT_OLDPCI support which is removed a few weeks before. Can we