Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 14:13:42 -0800 (PST) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JB 1) All parsing of /etc/shells should move off into libutil under a JBsuitable API. There is one in libc/gen that would do fine. The catch is that it is not used everywhere and some of the code that

kernel threading: the first steps [patch]

2001-01-27 Thread Root Dude
Here's a first step. I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures. At this moment the proc structure includes the other three, so there is no problem with allocation, and there is always a 1:1 correlation between them at this time so this is safe. SOme of the fields are probably in the

Re: kernel threading: the first steps [patch]

2001-01-27 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Root Dude writes: Here's a first step. I've broken the proc structure into 4 structures. [...] Uhm Julian, You are aware that other people are working on this stuff too ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP

OpenSSL 0.9.6-STABLE snapshot

2001-01-27 Thread Kris Kennaway
Please test the code at http://www.freebsd.org/~kris/openssl-0.9.6-stable.tgz - it's the latest snapshot of the OpenSSL 0.9.6-STABLE branch, containing lots of bugfixes against 0.9.6 etc. Just blat it over the top of your existing files from /usr/src. I especially want people to test it for

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:27:13 -0800 (PST) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JB How many contrib'd apps need to look at /etc/shells? The biggest one I think JB is sendmail, and Greg Shapiro is a very reasonable fellow, and can probably JB assist in getting sendmail at least to use the API as

Re: kernel threading: the first steps [patch]

2001-01-27 Thread Jason Evans
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:33:23AM -0800, Root Dude wrote: Here's a first step. This is very disappointing, Julian. You've duplicated work that I've already done, and if you've been paying attention at all, you know that it was already done. Even if you haven't been paying attention, I find

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 00:27:13 -0800 (PST) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JB How many contrib'd apps need to look at /etc/shells? The biggest one I think JB is sendmail, and Greg Shapiro is a very reasonable fellow, and can probably JB assist in getting sendmail at least to use the API as

XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Blaz Zupan
# dmesg ... xl0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx lo0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx isp0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx isp1 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx isp2 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx isp3 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx ... Anything to

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Blaz Zupan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: xl0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx [...] Nothing to worry about, it's just a reminder for us kernel jocks. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Matthew Jacob
Oh, yeah- can someone say *which* queue mtx it's referring to? On 27 Jan 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Blaz Zupan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: xl0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx [...] Nothing to worry about, it's just a reminder for us kernel jocks. DES -- Dag-Erling

panic on last night's kernel

2001-01-27 Thread Bob Bishop
Hi, cvsup at Sat Jan 27 04:04:26 GMT 2001 While booting, just after the message: faith0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx panic: malloc(M_WAITOK) in interrupt context DDB gives: panic() malloc() exit1() kthread_suspend() ithd_loop() fork_exit() fork_trampoline() -- Bob Bishop

LyX 1.1.5.2 dumping core

2001-01-27 Thread Patrick Hartling
I just rebuilt my -current system yesterday, and now LyX is throwing up all over itself. It starts up fine, but if I try to load a document or create a new one, it immediately dumps core. The problem seems to be occuring the the xforms library. I have a fresh copy of the compat3x distribution

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, yeah- can someone say *which* queue mtx it's referring to? des@des ~% current "driver didn.t initialize" src/sys/net/if.c: printf("%s%d XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx\n", des@des ~% grep -C "driver didn.t initialize"

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:57:40PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: Life is better than I thought the crypto stuff just has it as a fallback conditional on HAVE_GETUSERSHELL so that uses the one from libc. Which leaves only sendmail which is similar but for some reason does not have

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:17:22 -0600 "Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JV You could just use the nsdispatch() API that is in -CURRENT, and that JV getusershell() uses. I'm not sure what for, the changes I've made fit just as smoothly into _local_initshells as they do into

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Matthew Jacob
Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I wanted the person who made the change to actually broadcast to NIC maintainers what the expectations were... Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Oh, yeah- can someone say *which* queue mtx it's referring to? des@des ~% current "driver

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Jason Evans
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I wanted the person who made the change to actually broadcast to NIC maintainers what the expectations were... The code that prints these warnings out has existed for a while.

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Matthew Jacob
Shouldn't ether_ifattach initialize the mutex? Or do expect all drivers to initialize these prior to calling ether_ifattach? Look- I just want to know what the people who put the check in *want*. On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, I suppose, I did

Re: PCI changes break HP Docking Station

2001-01-27 Thread Mike Smith
This is weird; the bridge appears to be clearly misconfigured, and unless there's something funky in the datasheet (looking for it now) I'm not quite sure what the "right" thing to do is here. 8( Please let me know if you need anything more from me to help debug this. This is enough for

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Jason Evans
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Somewhere in between, Jason Evans wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I wanted the person who made the change to actually broadcast to NIC

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Matthew Jacob
cvs annotate is your friend. The code was added in revision 1.95 of src/sys/net/if.c by Jonathan Lemon. Please talk to him about what should be done to fix the drivers. Yes, and I shall... but this came up in a public forum. I'm making a point here (that apparently you and others don't

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Jonathan Lemon
In article local.mail.freebsd-current/[EMAIL PROTECTED] you write: On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I wanted the person who made the change to actually broadcast to NIC maintainers what the expectations were... The

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 01:05:58PM -0800, Jason Evans wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Somewhere in between, Jason Evans wrote: On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 12:36:41PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, I suppose, I did find that... well, mainly I

Fixed: LyX 1.1.5.2 dumping core

2001-01-27 Thread Patrick Hartling
Patrick Hartling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: } I just rebuilt my -current system yesterday, and now LyX is throwing up } all over itself. It starts up fine, but if I try to load a document or } create a new one, it immediately dumps core. The problem seems to be } occuring the the xforms library.

kernel hangs initializing Soundblaster AWE 64 midi driver

2001-01-27 Thread Farid Hajji
Hi, I'm tracking -CURRENT and build a kernel yesterday with the following options (edited): device sbc # Soundblaster Bridge-Code to pcm device pcm # PnP/PCI Sound Cards #device midi# Midi interfaces #device seq #

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Jacques A. Vidrine
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 08:48:59PM +0100, Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 13:17:22 -0600 "Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JV You could just use the nsdispatch() API that is in -CURRENT, and that JV getusershell() uses. I'm not sure what for, the changes

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread John Baldwin
On 27-Jan-01 Matthew Jacob wrote: Oh, yeah- can someone say *which* queue mtx it's referring to? The if queues. Ones with the IFQ_ENQUEUE() etc. macros. On 27 Jan 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Blaz Zupan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: xl0 XXX: driver didn't initialize queue mtx [...]

CD Extra disks on atapi-cd

2001-01-27 Thread Motomichi Matsuzaki
Hi. I've found that -current kernel couldn't mount CD-Extra disks on ATAPI CD drives. For example: Starting track = 1, ending track = 14, TOC size = 122 bytes track start duration block length type - 1 0:02.00 0:11.52 0

Re: Building -STABLE on -CURRENT

2001-01-27 Thread Sean Kelly
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 03:46:51PM -0500, Benjamin Lewis wrote: Robert, You wrote: For the last few days (not sure when it started) I've been unable to build -STABLE on a -CURRENT machine. This has proven a problem for recent RELENG_3 MFC's of security fixes; I've tried upgrading to

HEADSUP: WITNESS adn modules == bad juju

2001-01-27 Thread John Baldwin
Boris reminded me of someething I had forgotten to mention: currently unloading a module that uses mutexes with WITNESS enabled in the kernel will panic the kernel, cause witness tries to look at the string of the mutex name which is usually a constant in the module later on. This leads to a

Re: XXX driver didn't initialize queue mtx

2001-01-27 Thread Jason Evans
On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 03:19:04PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: Actually, the new check appears to be incorrect, as seen by the code fragments below: Whoops. I obviously looked at the wrong #define when making the change. Thanks for pointing out the mistake. Jason To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Steve O'Hara-Smith
On Sat, 27 Jan 2001 16:59:41 -0600 "Jacques A. Vidrine" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: JV I thought you might add it as a different source, so that it need not be JV the default. As I read it that is still a complementary possibility. The nsdispatch stuff could move the start point from

Re: patch for test: /etc/shells - /usr/local/etc/shells

2001-01-27 Thread Wes Peters
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 16:21:01 -0500 (EST) Garrett Wollman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GW On Fri, 26 Jan 2001 22:08:20 +0100, "Steve O'Hara-Smith" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: GW GWThe patch below (against 4-stable but it will probably apply easily GW to -current)