Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:00:26PM +0800, Donny Lee wrote: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: ===ipfilter make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h Stop. *** Error code 2 Looks like a stale dependency file to me. Try 'make cleandir' twice, followed by the usual 'make depend make

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:18:04AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ===ipfilter make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h Stop. *** Error code 2 Looks like a stale dependency file to me. Try 'make cleandir' twice, That only works in /usr/src

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
"David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:18:04AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ===ipfilter make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h Stop. *** Error code 2 Looks like a stale dependency file to me. Try 'make

trouble linking kernel (softdep)

2001-02-13 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Is this just me? After a fresh cvsup: make buildkernel KERNEL=RTFM-5.processed -DNOMODULES -DNO_MODULES -j 3 [...] cc -c -O -pipe -march=i686 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual

Re: setlocale() fails

2001-02-13 Thread nnd
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:21:15 +0900, I wrote: I found that setlocale() always fails on -current. . Any ideas? I found the culprit. Here is a patch which fixes the problem. Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")' to

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 11:15:24AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:18:04AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: ===ipfilter make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h Stop.

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Donny Lee
David O'Brien wrote: Looks like a stale dependency file to me. Try 'make cleandir' twice, followed by the usual 'make depend make make install'. Yes, but got no luck, stops at the same place.:) cd /sys/compile/YOURKERNELFILE rm -rf modules make depend make thanks, it

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: By doing so, I also noticed that, the general procedule i used to take: cd /sys/i386/conf config -r mykernel ^^ No point. cd ../../compile/mykernel make depend all install ^^ Wrong. It

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Donny Lee
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: By doing so, I also noticed that, the general procedule i used to take: cd /sys/i386/conf config -r mykernel ^^ No point. -r removes objects generated by a previous kernel config, i guess. cd ../../compile/mykernel

Re: setlocale() fails

2001-02-13 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:01:28 +0600 (NOVT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")' to return success, but it is not solve the problem totally. It seems to me that all comparisons of the return value from '__part_load_locale' in the 'lmessages.c',

Re: ipfilter broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Donny Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: config -r mykernel No point. -r removes objects generated by a previous kernel config, i guess. Still no point. Unless your tree is hosed, make(1) takes care of that, as long as you don't screw up by running all three

Re: HEADS UP: installworld gotchas

2001-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:58:11 -0800, "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That is (1) against Handbook documented policy, (2) too hackish (we aren't Linux). And who came up with that policy in the first place? -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:20:51 -0800, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If we had taken -current to 500, we could go to 501, 502, etc as required to stop killing our developers, and prior to entering 5.0-BETA we go back to the next sequentially available major number (be it 5, or 6 if

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Peter Wemm
Garrett Wollman wrote: On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:20:51 -0800, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If we had taken -current to 500, we could go to 501, 502, etc as required to stop killing our developers, and prior to entering 5.0-BETA we go back to the next sequentially available major

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:38:40 -0800, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There is no concept of "forward" or "backward" as far as the toolchain and runtime support goes. There is only "filename exists" or "file not found". This is a human-factors issue, not a code issue. People expect to see

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Paul RichardsF
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've had problems in the past going backwards on major versions of shared libaries. The major problem is that if I have binaries that refer to libc.so.503, then when the major number is reverted back to 5, it is a nop

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Peter Wemm
Garrett Wollman wrote: On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 07:38:40 -0800, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: There is no concept of "forward" or "backward" as far as the toolchain and runtime support goes. There is only "filename exists" or "file not found". This is a human-factors issue, not a code

Re: setlocale() fails

2001-02-13 Thread Alexey Zelkin
hi, Yep! You was completely correct, I made mistake in mostly cosmetics "style(9)" commit :-( Thanks for spoting that! BTW, problem should be fixed as side effect of my commit made some time ago related to __part_load_locale() interface change. Check it please. On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at

Re: setlocale() fails

2001-02-13 Thread Nickolay N. Dudorov
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 12:26:39AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: At Tue, 13 Feb 2001 20:01:28 +0600 (NOVT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes this patch permits 'setlocale(LC_ALL, "")' to return success, but it is not solve the problem totally. It seems to me that all comparisons of the

linksys Etherfast.. broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Julian Elischer
I used to use a Linksys Etherfast card in my Inspiron, but I haven't used it for a while. Today I tried to use it again but it failed miserably.. related lines from dmesg: pcic-pci0: TI PCI-1225 PCI-CardBus Bridge at device 4.0 on pci0 pcic-pci0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [ring enable][speaker

Re: linksys Etherfast.. broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 10 slot 0 on pccard0 IRQ 10 is likely used by another hunk of hardware. Pick another one. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: linksys Etherfast.. broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Warner Losh
Warner Losh writes: : In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Julian Elischer writes: : : ed0 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 10 slot 0 on pccard0 : : IRQ 10 is likely used by another hunk of hardware. Pick another one. Actually, this Linksys Etherfast name tickles something in the back of my mind. I

DRI

2001-02-13 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
Anyone know if -current supports Direct Rendering Infrastructure? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread David O'Brien
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:24:00PM +, Paul RichardsF wrote: When we dropped minor numbers I had a worry that we'd run into one of Windows' greatest problems and we have. Applications that are developed and tested to work with a particular library might not work with a different version,

Re: linksys Etherfast.. broken?

2001-02-13 Thread Pierre Y. Dampure
Julian Elischer wrote: I used to use a Linksys Etherfast card in my Inspiron, but I haven't used it for a while. Today I tried to use it again but it failed miserably.. Most probably you noticed this already, but (in src/UPDATING): 20001218: Linksys Fast Ethernet PCCARD cards

Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...)

2001-02-13 Thread Paul Richards
David O'Brien wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 04:24:00PM +, Paul RichardsF wrote: When we dropped minor numbers I had a worry that we'd run into one of Windows' greatest problems and we have. Applications that are developed and tested to work with a particular library might not work

Re: DRI

2001-02-13 Thread Andrew Kenneth Milton
+---[ David W. Chapman Jr. ]-- | Anyone know if -current supports Direct Rendering Infrastructure? XFree4 supports it, it's not really a FreeBSD issue, other than actually building the drm kernel module. -- Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet| P:+61 7 3870 0066 |