Re: worklist_remove panic

2001-05-26 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For some reason, sysinstall or the kernel decided to += 64k on the > start address of the swap partition (to avoid swap clobbering the > fdisk, bootblocks, etc at the start of the disk), but neglected to > remove 64k from the size. This could be undone. S

next panic: blockable sleep lock

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Harnois
freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, sbsize = 3197224 freeing uidinfo: uid = 0, proccnt = 86 kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled panic: blockable sleep lock (sleep mutex) Giant @ ../../vm/vm_fault.c:213 Debugger("panic") Stopped at Debugger+0x45: pushl %ebx db> t Debugger(c0350d9b) at Debugger+0x45 panic

Re: recursed on non-recursive lock

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Harnois
After I'd been up a couple of hours I had a spontaneous reboot. No idea why. Still a lot better than I'd been doing ... -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa Earth has its boundaries, but human stupidity is l

Re: kbdcontrol the build-tool revisited (was: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/kbdcontrol kbdcontrol.c)

2001-05-26 Thread Dima Dorfman
Hi folks, As I'm sure most people here know, kbdcontrol is a build-tool because sysinstall requires it to generate keymap.h. This means that it has to compile with the headers already in /usr/include on the host system; the last time this came up with PASTE, we just defined the needed constant i

Correctness of UIO_MAXIOV definition?

2001-05-26 Thread John
Hi, A few days ago I posted a short message to hackers asking for input concerning the definition of UIO_MAXIOV. The definition of UIO_MAXIOV is hidden behind _KERNEL. I have a small patch I'd like to apply to simply move the #define outside of _KERNEL. The patch is below. The second q

Re: recursed on non-recursive lock

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Harnois
On Sun, 27 May 2001 03:59:20 +0200, Thomas Moestl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > The attached patch just unlocks vm_mtx before this call and > reacquires the it when it's done. This works for me Me, too. So far, at least ... uptime 25 minutes, swapping, X running, none of which I could do b

Re: Boot time memory issue

2001-05-26 Thread Barry Lustig
Mike Smith wrote: > > > Here are the SMAP lines: > > > > SMAP type=01 base= len= 0009f800 > > SMAP type=02 base= 0009f800 len= 0800 > > SMAP type=02 base= 000e8400 len= 00017c00 > > SMAP type=01 base= 0010 len= 13ef0

Re: recursed on non-recursive lock

2001-05-26 Thread Thomas Moestl
On Sat, 2001/05/26 at 11:07:36 -0500, Michael Harnois wrote: > I finally got this much. I hope it helps. > > lock order reversal > 1st 0xc03af0a0 mntvnode @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:1007 > 2nd 0xc8b539cc vnode interlock @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1016 > > recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep

Re: Boot time memory issue

2001-05-26 Thread Mike Smith
> Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > > > Sun, May 20, 2001 at 19:53:29, barry (Barry Lustig) wrote about "Boot time memory >issue": > > > > Do verbose boot (`boot -v') with large SC_HISTORY_SIZE (1000 at least, > > 2000 at most), and after boot check for "SMAP ..." lines at the very > > beginning of

Re: Boot time memory issue

2001-05-26 Thread Barry Lustig
Valentin Nechayev wrote: > > Sun, May 20, 2001 at 19:53:29, barry (Barry Lustig) wrote about "Boot time memory >issue": > > Do verbose boot (`boot -v') with large SC_HISTORY_SIZE (1000 at least, > 2000 at most), and after boot check for "SMAP ..." lines at the very > beginning of the kernel bo

Q) lock order reversal

2001-05-26 Thread Takeshi Ken Yamada
Hi! With recent -current kernel, I get message below with P3@800Mhz X 2 when booting up. What is wrong? lock order reversal 1st 0xc04d4ac0 mntvnode @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c 1007 2nd 0xdb3001ac vnode interlock @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c 1016 To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: worklist_remove panic

2001-05-26 Thread Peter Wemm
David Malone wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > No dump (dumps seem to have been broken for about a month now), but a > > stacktrace from DDB: > > Crashdumps have been working for me recently, (apart from the fact > that they overrun the end of my sw

Re: 'make includes' ownership patch

2001-05-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 02:59:22PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using > INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying > to do a 'make includes' as a normal user. Oops, hit send too soon; more changes are required of the

Re: Date for a working -current?

2001-05-26 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:56:41PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Joseph Koshy writes: > : I'm in the processing of bring a 5-current system of Oct 2000 vintage > : more upto-date. > > May 18th, 2001 12:00:00 is what I've been using. One must be careful posting somet

'make includes' ownership patch

2001-05-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
Shouldn't the includes/Makefile be installing headers using INCOWN/INCGRP instead of BINOWN/BINGRP? I ran into this when trying to do a 'make includes' as a normal user. Kris Index: include/Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/inc

mutex panic

2001-05-26 Thread Jens Schweikhardt
hello, world\n my system cvsupped around May 25 reliably causes a panic when I $ cp /cdrom/distfiles/somefiles /tmp I've written down the message from the debugger: /usr/src/sys/kern_synch.c:385: sleeping with "vm" locked from /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_pager.c: 428 panic: sleeping process owns a mute

Re: worklist_remove panic

2001-05-26 Thread David Malone
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 09:25:32PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > No dump (dumps seem to have been broken for about a month now), but a > stacktrace from DDB: Crashdumps have been working for me recently, (apart from the fact that they overrun the end of my swap partition by 64k and clobber

worklist_remove panic

2001-05-26 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
No dump (dumps seem to have been broken for about a month now), but a stacktrace from DDB: kernel: type 12 trap, code=0 Stopped at worklist_remove+0x1c: cmpw$0,0xa(%ecx) db> trace worklist_remove(deadc0de) at worklist_remove+0x1c free_diradd(deadc0de) at free_diradd+0x26 free_newdirblk

Re: amd feature request (Re: AMD config file question.)

2001-05-26 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
mi> Heh. That was a feature request only. I don't even know the details of mi> NFS, much less SMB. Sorry, Since amd is not FreeBSD specfic product, how 'bout sending your request to the am-utils developers? -- - Makoto `MAR' MATSUSHITA To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "uns

Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs)

2001-05-26 Thread Jesper Skriver
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:44:37PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 04:26:48PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > I still don't see why an rc.conf knob specifically for /tmp isn't > > > sufficient. That's what people want this for.

recursed on non-recursive lock

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Harnois
I finally got this much. I hope it helps. lock order reversal 1st 0xc03af0a0 mntvnode @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vnops.c:1007 2nd 0xc8b539cc vnode interlock @ ../../ufs/ffs/ffs_vfsops.c:1016 recursed on non-recursive lock (sleep mutex) vm @ ../../ufs/ufs/ufs_readwrite.c:420 first acquired @ ../../vm/vn

Re: Panic: spin lock shed lock hold by ... for >5 seconds

2001-05-26 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 11:04:24AM +0200, Michael Reifenberger wrote: > Hi, > I get the above panic when just running aviplay (/usr/ports/graphics/avifile) or >wine. > Since both programs use USER_LDT functions I suspect a problem there in the kernel. > The kernel is the latest -current. > I get

Re: buildworld

2001-05-26 Thread Doug Barton
clemensF wrote: > > i'm having trouble upgrading my freebsd 4. it was frequently patched due > to troubles with poll(2) and ipfilter. a few days ago i cvsup'ed to tag=., That would have brought your sources to 5-Current, not 4-Stable. > but the build failed at various stages.

Re: vm_pager_(de)allocate and vm_mtx

2001-05-26 Thread Peter Wemm
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010525 22:22] wrote: > > Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if > > necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not? At the moment, detaching > > an md(4) disk will panic the system with a failed mtx_assert in > > vm_

Panic: spin lock shed lock hold by ... for >5 seconds

2001-05-26 Thread Michael Reifenberger
Hi, I get the above panic when just running aviplay (/usr/ports/graphics/avifile) or wine. Since both programs use USER_LDT functions I suspect a problem there in the kernel. The kernel is the latest -current. I get no kernel-dump because the panic seems to loop (in conjunction with some lockmgr:

buildworld

2001-05-26 Thread clemensF
i'm having trouble upgrading my freebsd 4. it was frequently patched due to troubles with poll(2) and ipfilter. a few days ago i cvsup'ed to tag=., but the build failed at various stages. my gaol at the beginning was only to upgrade for reconfiguring the kernel, as i will be getting DSL soon an

Re: vm_pager_(de)allocate and vm_mtx

2001-05-26 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dima Dorfman write s: >Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> * Dima Dorfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010525 22:22] wrote: >> > Is there a reason vm_pager_allocate acquires vm_mtx itself if >> > necessary but vm_pager_deallocate does not? At the moment, detach

Re: mount_mfs (Re: smbfs)

2001-05-26 Thread Doug Barton
My take on it is that having a script that you can feed parameters and have it create a nice memory disk for you would be a cool thing, and since you'd have to put effectively the same commands into rc (or wherever) the "bloat" would be minimal. So, if someone wants to send me the stuff, either th