* :: Patrick Tracanelli :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010803 10:51] wrote:
Hello you all;
I want to know if there is a working way to keep FreeBSD's user database
loaded in memory. The reason's for that is very clear, if i keep my spwd.db
loaded the access to it won't be a disk access, so this
Peter Sides
Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sorry to bug this list with this question. I'd like to test the newer
ray(4) driver that's in -CURRENT. What snapshot should I install? Is
there anything else I should know before installing -CURRENT? (besides
what the cutting edge section of the
On Fri, 3 Aug 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 03 Aug 2001 10:18:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
So let me guess. Not only does Mills think that the web is the only
sensible distribution medium for documentation, he also thinks that
English is the only sensible language for it?
Ha, you
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his
ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he
is. Almost as bad as Linus.
:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/ntp
You can checkout
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, Mixtim wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:03:10PM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote:
Ha, you think that's bad. Mills doesn't want to be bothered to change his
ways to use any sort of revision control. That's how set in his ways he
is. Almost as bad as Linus.
According to Gordon Tetlow:
From what I gather (and the cvs repo seems to back up) is that Mills has
never actually committed a thing. Harlan Stenn does most of the CVS work.
That's correct.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr
I've cc'd freebsd-current here.
This is a followup to a small thread on the UK user group list about
the stability of -stable.
Joe Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 02:42:44PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:
=20
This hasn't suddenly changed in FreeBSD -- the
On Sun, Aug 05, 2001 at 01:26:34AM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
Back in the old days -stable was reserved for bug fixes and some
features/enhancements. ABI and API changes weren't allowed. When
someone made a mistake, they got the same clout across the back of
the head that they do now,
I wrote:
An increasing number of executables on that box are sporting ever
newer mtimes. This appears to have been going on ever since the
Jul 25 update. There is no clear pattern which executables are
touched. md5 comparisons with previous backup levels (using a Jul 13
copy of md5)
On Thu, Aug 02, 2001 at 12:25:13PM +0200, Ollivier Robert wrote:
Now that ntpd 4.1.0 has been released (finally!), I'll upgrade current very
soon.
The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code
builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now,
On 04-Aug-01 Gordon Tetlow wrote:
I decided I was going to brave 5.0-CURRENT and give the snapshots
available on current.jp.freebsd.org a try. I found a couple issues with
installation disks (FWIW, I tried it on the lastest snapshot avail on
current.freebsd.org. I got the same results).
On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:21:14PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:13:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
# On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
# what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
# pain.
#
# Brian,
= 26 (irq10:sn0)
trap number = 12
panic: page fault
syncing disks...
done
Uptime: 2s
FWIW, it's 5.0-20010804-JPSNAP #0 available off of current.jp.freebsd.org.
I noticed it said it was in sn0. So being industrious, I interrupted the
autoboot and did:
ok set hint.sn.0.disabled=1
Sure
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 10:30:42AM -0500, some SMTP stream spewed forth:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2001 at 09:34:41PM -0400, a little birdie told me
that Garance A Drosihn remarked
At 11:18 PM -0700 7/17/01, Peter Wemm wrote:
If I had to guess, I'd put the total [genuine] -current userbase
at
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) For some reason, my mdmfs line in /etc/fstab always does a chmod
777 /tmp at mount-time
/dev/md0/tmpmfs rw,-s=65536 0 0
As previously threatened, I implemented bug-to-bug compatibility with
mount_mfs().
16 matches
Mail list logo
