Re: Why do soft interrupt coelescing?

2001-10-09 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:28:02 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: > [ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ] > > > As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties > > into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the > > ti(4) d

Re: Why do soft interrupt coelescing?

2001-10-09 Thread Terry Lambert
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote: [ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ] > As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties > into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the > ti(4) driver. IMO, you should be able to tweak the coalescing parameters > on

Re: uucp user shell and home directory

2001-10-09 Thread Lyndon Nerenberg
> None of those things are realproblems. I've set up the port to be > hosted on MASTER_SITE_LOCAL for now, but Lyndon's free to go and host > it wherever he likes, organise whatever community support he likes (if > theres nontrivial interest he could surely even get a freebsd.org > mailing list s

Re: kldxref broken, maybe?

2001-10-09 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:19:22PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Warner Losh wrote: > > > In message Mark Peek writes: > > > : Install a -current kernel on a 4.X or pre-kldxref (before 9/10/01) > > > : 5.X

Re: options NO_KLD

2001-10-09 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Holtor wrote: > Will this NO_KLD option be commited to > -current and then hopefully -stable? > > I have been checking the LINT file each morning > after the nightly cvsup runs hoping to find this > option in there but so far havent seen it in > sight. >