On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 12:28:02 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> [ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ]
>
> > As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
> > into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
> > ti(4) d
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
[ ... soft interrupt coelescing ... ]
> As you say above, this is actually a good thing. I don't see how this ties
> into the patch to introduce some sort of interrupt coalescing into the
> ti(4) driver. IMO, you should be able to tweak the coalescing parameters
> on
> None of those things are realproblems. I've set up the port to be
> hosted on MASTER_SITE_LOCAL for now, but Lyndon's free to go and host
> it wherever he likes, organise whatever community support he likes (if
> theres nontrivial interest he could surely even get a freebsd.org
> mailing list s
If memory serves me right, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:19:22PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > Warner Losh wrote:
> > > In message Mark Peek writes:
> > > : Install a -current kernel on a 4.X or pre-kldxref (before 9/10/01)
> > > : 5.X
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Holtor wrote:
> Will this NO_KLD option be commited to
> -current and then hopefully -stable?
>
> I have been checking the LINT file each morning
> after the nightly cvsup runs hoping to find this
> option in there but so far havent seen it in
> sight.
>