Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chad David writes: On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning md10ec which it shouldn't do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the minutes right now to hunt it down.

No Subject

2001-10-22 Thread Vadim Zaychenko
úÄÒÁ×ÓÔ×ÕÊÔÅ, freebsd-current. -- Best regards, Vadim Zaychenko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 92369162 =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= íÁÌÏÉÚ×ÅÓÔÎÙÊ ÓÅÄØÍÏÊ ÚÁËÏÎ îØÀÔÏÎÁ: ðÔÉÃÁ × ÒÕËÅ ÂÅÚÏÐÁÓÎÅÊ, ÞÅÍ ÎÁÄ ÇÏÌÏ×ÏÊ. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Re: Current makeworld seems broken.

2001-10-22 Thread Bruce Evans
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001, Harry Starr wrote: The problem is the new inclusion of ipfilter stuff. Make will change directory to .OBJDIR if it exists, and it does NOW that there is an ipfilter SUBDIR. The support for a separate object tree unfortunately gives separate object directories even to

One or more if {disklabel,mdconfig,newfs} broken for small , file-backed md file systems.

2001-10-22 Thread Robert Watson
For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken: sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 1024000 bytes transferred in 0.234674 secs (4363498 bytes/sec) sproing#

Re: One or more if {disklabel,mdconfig,newfs} broken for small , file-backed md file systems.

2001-10-22 Thread Maxim Sobolev
On Mon, 22 Oct 2001 14:23:17 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson wrote: For small devices (unclear definition of small), the following (changed from swap to vnode from the mdconfig man page example) is broken: sproing# dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1024000 count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out

Re: Windows 2000 Host running FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE guest

2001-10-22 Thread Brad Laue
Just as a data point, vmware 2.0.4.1142 under 4.4-STABLE as host boots 4.2-4.4-STABLE guest extremely slowly, and freezes at the 'mounting root' line under 5.0-CURRENT, as of 10/21/2001. I left it alone for five hours under -CURRENT, no way it would move. Brad // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ --

Re: Some interrupt coalescing tests

2001-10-22 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: In the non-LRP case, the percentage drop in interrupt overhead is ~10% (as has been observed by others). THis makes sense, too, if you consider that NETISR driving of receives means less time in interrupt processing. If we multiply the 15% (100%

Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current

2001-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 22, 2001 at 11:58:23AM +1000, Harry Starr wrote: It seems to be nigh impossible to build a previous release on -current. Problems include incomplete cross tool building, header files, and of course, device support, in particular differences between the old vn stuff, and the new

Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current

2001-10-22 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
Problems include incomplete cross tool building, header files, and of course, device support, in particular differences between the old vn stuff, and the new md device. kris I build worlds in a jail populated with the target release so there's kris no problems with this. That's true, maybe

Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current

2001-10-22 Thread Harry Starr
- Original Message - From: Makoto MATSUSHITA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current That's true, maybe he only wanna say about 4-stable make release with (recent) 5-current box in the latter half of

No Subject

2001-10-22 Thread vbrammer
subscribe freebsd-current To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current

2001-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 23, 2001 at 12:08:17PM +1000, Harry Starr wrote: - Original Message - From: Makoto MATSUSHITA [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 10:21 AM Subject: Re: RELENG_4 builds on -current That's true, maybe he only wanna say about

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-22 Thread Harti Brandt
On Fri, 19 Oct 2001, Mark Peek wrote: MPYes, it does appear to be due to this commit. The first address on the MPinterface queue has an address of 0.0.0.0. Here's a patch that works for MPme to block the messages. I'm guessing at the correct behavior so use at MPyour own risk. At least the

Financial Strategies

2001-10-22 Thread Info Center
Doctors, Lawyers, Business Owners, Home Makers, Students, and More! What Do ALL These People Have In Common? They all have been opened up to a NEW way of thinking! Our organization has helped people from all walks of life earn from 10k to 50k per