Fatal trap 12 with recent current (notebook with network pc-card)

2001-10-31 Thread Ilmar S. Habibulin
I have Mitac 7020 notebook with Apollo 10/100M Fast Ethernet PC Card. Today i cvsuped recent current and now kernel panics ufter card insertion with the folowing message: pccard: card inserted, slot 0 date time mobile pccardd[186]: Card Dual Speed(10/100 PC Card) [1.0] [ ] matched Dual Speed

No Subject

2001-10-31 Thread darryl wisneski
? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

kernel panic in getnewvnode

2001-10-31 Thread Steve Kargl
The filesystem with the kernel that had debugging symbols was fried. All I have is below, but I can try to crash the system tonight, if needed, with a (new) debuggable kernel. -- Steve (kgdb) bt #0 0xc017fd9e in dumpsys () #1 0xc017fb8b in boot () #2 0xc017ffbd in panic () #3 0xc01ac62b

RE: Fatal trap 12 with recent current (notebook with network pc-

2001-10-31 Thread John Baldwin
On 31-Oct-01 Ilmar S. Habibulin wrote: I have Mitac 7020 notebook with Apollo 10/100M Fast Ethernet PC Card. Today i cvsuped recent current and now kernel panics ufter card insertion with the folowing message: pccard: card inserted, slot 0 date time mobile pccardd[186]: Card Dual

weird -current gdb/gcc(?) problem

2001-10-31 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Hackers, first of all i want to apologize for posting this in -current. this should probably go into -questions. i have some weird problem. i have cvsup'ed and installed -current yesterday. i have attached script(1) output. quick search came up with nothing. did i miss anything? thanks max

Repeatable make_dev() crash during periodic daily run

2001-10-31 Thread Jos Backus
Fyi: my system at home has crashed twice now at 3:01am during the periodic daily run with: WARNING: Driver mistake: repeat make_dev(da0a) I can crash it at will (did so this morning) by running periodic daily. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA

Re: Repeatable make_dev() crash during periodic daily run

2001-10-31 Thread Jos Backus
Hi Poul-Henning, On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Make sure you have rev 1.46 of sys/kern/subr_disk.c and 1.100 of sys/kern/kern_conf.c In other words: the latest. I know, and I do. lizzy:/sys/kern% uname -a FreeBSD lizzy.bugworks.com 5.0-CURRENT

Re: Repeatable make_dev() crash during periodic daily run

2001-10-31 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jos Backus writes: Hi Poul-Henning, On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 07:38:56PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Make sure you have rev 1.46 of sys/kern/subr_disk.c and 1.100 of sys/kern/kern_conf.c In other words: the latest. I know, and I do. OK, so far so

where did smp_started go?

2001-10-31 Thread Matthew Jacob
Kernels no build smp_started hath vanisheddeclaring it an extern volatile int smp_started; in smp.h doesn't really help. Did you intend for the actual storage to be in $ARCH/$ARCH/mp_machdep.c? -matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current

Re: where did smp_started go?

2001-10-31 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:09:10PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Kernels no build smp_started hath vanisheddeclaring it an extern volatile int smp_started; in smp.h doesn't really help. Did you intend for the actual storage to be in $ARCH/$ARCH/mp_machdep.c? No. It was a

Re: where did smp_started go?

2001-10-31 Thread Matthew Jacob
oops. can you revert i386/mp_machdep.c then? On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:09:10PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: Kernels no build smp_started hath vanisheddeclaring it an extern volatile int smp_started; in smp.h doesn't really

[Fwd: weird -current gdb/gcc(?) problem]

2001-10-31 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: What is the problem exactly? It is hard to guess that from the information you posted. foo (i=1, s=10244, c=-54 'J', str=0x804855b test) at prog1.c:13 Is that what bothers you? It happens because your code is compiled with no optimization, and that causes

Re: weird -current gdb/gcc(?) problem

2001-10-31 Thread Joerg Wunsch
Maksim Yevmenkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i have some weird problem. Well, it would have been nice if you had told what you deemed to be the problem. ;-) I can't find any problem at all... Breakpoint 1, main () at prog1.c:8 8 return (foo(1, 2, '3', test)); (gdb) s foo (i=1,

Re: weird -current gdb/gcc(?) problem

2001-10-31 Thread Maksim Yevmenkin
Joerg, i have some weird problem. Well, it would have been nice if you had told what you deemed to be the problem. ;-) I can't find any problem at all... Breakpoint 1, main () at prog1.c:8 8 return (foo(1, 2, '3', test)); (gdb) s foo (i=1, s=10244, c=-54 'Ê',

Re: WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 154/0

2001-10-31 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Nick Hibma writes: : Yes. I have no idea why phk has not done this. Because the asr driver maintainer has asserted a strong lock in the past and phk doesn't have an asr card. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Steve Kargl
Can someone revert awk to one that actually works? === usr.bin/kdump sh /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include ioctl.c awk: newline in string #include cam/scsi/s... at source line 1 awk: newline in string #include cam/scsi/s... at source line 1 awk: newline in string

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: Can someone revert awk to one that actually works? Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead?? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Steve Kargl
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: Can someone revert awk to one that actually works? Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead?? That's fine. But, before pulling the switch on a major

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: Can someone revert awk to one that actually works? Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Jos Backus
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead?? What about this patch? --- mkioctls.orig Wed Oct 31 17:08:33 2001 +++ mkioctlsWed Oct 31 17:13:07 2001 @@ -19,50 +19,48 @@ # Build a list of headers that have

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 05:14:34PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: Why don't we look at fixing the mkioctls script instead?? What about this patch? It does not work. +cat 'EOT' +/* XXX obnoxious prerequisites. */

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Jos Backus
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:12:07PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: It does not work. Bummer. I'll look at it when I get back from dinner. +cat 'EOT' +/* XXX obnoxious prerequisites. */ ^^^ what should this be terminating? Or where is it's terminating

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:56:18PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 04:45:58PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 03:16:37PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: Can someone revert awk to one that actually works?

kernel build fails in atomic.c

2001-10-31 Thread Jim Bryant
I got the following eariler, and thinking I was out of sync, I cvsupped everything from scratch, and still got it. --- cc -c -g -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -f format-extensions

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Mike Barcroft
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote: I *DID* test it with a full `make world'. By chance is this your second `make world' after the change? It seems we are using the host awk instead of the one we built. Requiring someone to do two back-to-back

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Jos Backus
(Sigh. In my mkioctls patch I tried to get rid of the need to pass in $ioctl_includes to awk but I can't think of any way to make that work. Oh well. Glad it works now.) -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/Santa Clara, CA _/ _/ _/

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Mike Barcroft wrote: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote: I *DID* test it with a full `make world'. By chance is this your second `make world' after the change? It seems we are using the host awk instead of the one we

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread David O'Brien
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't required, but are a good idea none the less. All I'll say is just about every large change I

Re: weird -current gdb/gcc(?) problem

2001-10-31 Thread Joerg Wunsch
As Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: first of all i want to apoligize. i sent the wrong output. yes, it does the right thing if you use -g switch, however it does not work for me if i use -ggdb switch. Indeed, the output generated with -ggdb looks weird. But then, it never occurred to me to use -ggdb

Re: Revert awk to one that works

2001-10-31 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 31 Oct 2001, David O'Brien wrote: On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 10:12:43PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: My only purpose in replying was to state my objection to the sufficency of David's argument. There are a lot of things that aren't required, but are a good idea none the less. All

Re: buildworld breakage during make depend at usr.bin/kdump

2001-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:34:16 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include /usr/src/usr.bin/jot/jot.c cd /usr/src/usr.bin/jot; make _EXTRADEPEND echo jot: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a .depend === usr.bin/kdump sh

buildworld breakage during make depend at usr.bin/kdump

2001-10-31 Thread David Wolfskill
=== usr.bin/jot rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include /usr/src/usr.bin/jot/jot.c cd /usr/src/usr.bin/jot; make _EXTRADEPEND echo jot: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a .depend === usr.bin/kdump sh /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/mkioctls

Re: Clock Drift

2001-10-31 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 06:17 pm, Dreamtime.net Inc. wrote: A while back I read a thread regarding clock drift. We are now having the same problem. Does anyone know what the remedy is for this? Thanks. Sincerely, Stephen H. Kapit I had the same problem a couple of months ago. Try adding

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_smp.c src/sys/sys smp.h

2001-10-31 Thread Nickolay Dudorov
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcel Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: marcel 2001/10/31 01:03:05 PST Modified files: sys/kern subr_smp.c sys/sys smp.h Log: Make smp_started volatile in sys/smp.h and remove the volatile declaration in subr_smp.c.

Re: ouch -- the second controller on Promise-66 is not detected!

2001-10-31 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
I just commit the fix using new devclass_find_free_unit() interface function. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message