With the 5-current source as of Dec/02/2001 15:00 GMT.
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
(cd /usr/src/usr.bin/telnet && make -DRELEASE_CRUNCH depend && make -DRELEASE_CRUNCH
commands.o main.o network.o ring.o sys_bsd.o telnet.o terminal.o utilities.o genget.o
getent.o misc.o)
rm -f .depend
mkd
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Glenn Gombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Are there any FreeBSD 'Anonymous' FreeBSD Servers avaiable besides:
> ":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs" , I keep getting an
> error on this one when trying to make a copy of /usr/src...
Well, what is the error?
On Monday 03 December 2001 02:28, David Xu wrote:
> This is strange, the problem would happen in heavy forked system which
> have lots of pages
> are shared between lots of process and most are commited to these
> processes, this is a known
> FreeBSD VM problem, the pv_entry are static allocated
This is strange, the problem would happen in heavy forked system which
have lots of pages
are shared between lots of process and most are commited to these
processes, this is a known
FreeBSD VM problem, the pv_entry are static allocated using vm_zone
with max limit set.
strange thing is it ha
Are there any FreeBSD 'Anonymous' FreeBSD Servers avaiable besides:
":pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/ncvs" , I keep getting an
error on this one when trying to make a copy of /usr/src...
Thanks,
Glenn G.
__
FREE voicemail, email, and fax.
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 01:52:19AM +0100, Daniel Rock wrote:
> Robert Watson schrieb:
> > That said, I won't argue it's intuitive unless you know about the behavior
> > already, and it probably should be documented in the stat(2) man page. If
> > you're interested in discussing these semantics, i
Robert Watson schrieb:
>
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Daniel Rock wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > lstat(), fstat(), stat() returned structure is inconsistent and
> > misleading if the file has ACLs associated with it.
>
> That behavior is defined by POSIX.1e, so it's what we implemented; you'll
> find that t
On Sunday, 2 December 2001 at 11:56:45 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> Well, I finally got to it, please report back to me if this
> works for you on newer SiS chipsets, especially:
>
> SiS 630, 633, 635, 730, 733 and 735
>
> Also, support for the older:
>
> SiS 530, 540 and 620
>
> Should be in
On Sun, 2 Dec 2001, Daniel Rock wrote:
> Hi,
>
> lstat(), fstat(), stat() returned structure is inconsistent and
> misleading if the file has ACLs associated with it.
That behavior is defined by POSIX.1e, so it's what we implemented; you'll
find that the same behavior is present on other plat
* Emiel Kollof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011202 16:38] wrote:
>
> >From my dmesg:
> pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
>
> What does that mean? Is it a bug?
> (dmesg attached)
It's only a bug in that you haven't done any research to solve the
problem. You nee
>From my dmesg:
pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
What does that mean? Is it a bug?
(dmesg attached)
--
'Tis the dream of each programmer,
Before his life is done,
To write three lines of APL,
And make the damn things run.
Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The
Odd experience today -- was building a kernel with the standard makefiles
and -j 4, and found the following in buildkernel.log:
...
cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
-fformat-extensions -ansi -g
On 2001-Nov-30 10:55:39 +0200, Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Peter Jeremy wrote:
>>
>> With a recently re-built XFree86, running on -current from last Sunday,
>> whenever I hit one of the keypad keys, the X server crashes. This is
>> somewhat disconcerting...
...
>Apply the following
Hi,
lstat(), fstat(), stat() returned structure is inconsistent and misleading
if the file has ACLs associated with it.
Example:
% getfacl test
#file:test
#owner:0
#group:4004
user::rw-
group::r--
group:wheel:rw-
mask::rw-
other::r--
So the file has permissions rw-r--r--, but an additional gro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > However, I think the point is moot because in current I've fixed it to
: > clip the ranges properly.
:
: That's definitely what I intended. I guess I should fix the typos in
: that file too, eh?
Yes. Were they mine or yours :-)
Warner
To
> : > : requests for the register window to be based at 0xf400.
> : >
> : > Actually, for most people, just ignoring the error is enough to make
> : > it work.
> :
> : This bothers me. Are bridges ignoring their mapping registers?
>
> It would appaer that they are. It hurts my brain that
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: > : As a workaround for you, though, try adjusting the memory that the driver
: > : requests for the register window to be based at 0xf400.
: >
: > Actually, for most people, just ignoring the error is enough to make
: > it work.
:
: This
> : As a workaround for you, though, try adjusting the memory that the driver
> : requests for the register window to be based at 0xf400.
>
> Actually, for most people, just ignoring the error is enough to make
> it work.
This bothers me. Are bridges ignoring their mapping registers?
--
> I don't know if there's a way to stop this, but it's normal, whenever I use
> my Parallel port zip drive, I have similar problems.
There isn't, really. The parallel port is terribly inefficient.
> > But what surprises me is that copying that data to the parallel intfc burns
> > up an incredi
I don't know if there's a way to stop this, but it's normal, whenever I use
my Parallel port zip drive, I have similar problems.
Ken
On Sunday 02 December 2001 01:20 pm, you wrote:
> I have an HP postsript laser (2100M) on a parallel intfc.
>
> [alane ~]$ uname -a
> FreeBSD wwweasel.geeksrus.ne
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Sunday, December 2, 2001 at 13:20:35
---
Customer: Are you looking to make money online?
If you're either looking for a job, tired of yo
On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 06:22:57PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 12:13:30PM +0100, Patrik Sundberg wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 01, 2001 at 09:40:33AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:35:43PM -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> > > > ps> has anyone test
Well, I finally got to it, please report back to me if this
works for you on newer SiS chipsets, especially:
SiS 630, 633, 635, 730, 733 and 735
Also, support for the older:
SiS 530, 540 and 620
Should be in place now.
Anyhow If you have one of the above, please test with a new -current,
and
On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this
> | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and
> | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs
> | is not compilable yet).
>
> Excel
24 matches
Mail list logo
