On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:17:43PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The problem is that the exported FSs exports are managed in the
> per FS mount code, and they really ought to be managed in higher
> level code (above the VFS layer, but still in the kernel).
>
> This is incidently what prevents us
David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 10:17:43PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > The problem is that the exported FSs exports are managed in the
> > per FS mount code, and they really ought to be managed in higher
> > level code (above the VFS layer, but still in the kernel).
> >
> > This
On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 15:25:23 PST, Julian Elischer wrote:
> excuse the ignorance.. doe sthis REPLACE the kernel smbfs,
> or extend it?
> > On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 14:22:00 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> >
> > > I've just imported the userland components of smbfs into HEAD.
This doesn't touch the k
Hello,
I have just compiled and installed -current from this morning
7AMPST, and have noticed that when acpi is enabled in loader.conf the OS
does not see the ps2 mouse port. When I turn off ACPI the mouse port
shows up fine. Other than not seeing the ps2 port when in ACPI enabled
mode, t
Well, everybody can read the commit message, it basically contains all
that is to say. I've offered the patch for review quite some time
ago, but nobody seemed to be interested (or at least nobody had some
feedback to me). So i've been running the patched system here for too
long now, it's time
Sounds more like a non-reachable dhcp server
On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, Edwin Culp wrote:
> Is anyone using dhclient successfully with Current of the last week or so?
> I don't use it all the time but I have been trying for the last couple of
> days without success.
>
> It accesses the server and c
Hi
I'm seeing the same problem on my MSI bookpc. For some reasons, the psm
device will fail to get an IRQ when ACPI is enabled.
Can you try the attached patch and see if it helps?
kt
On Sat, Dec 15, 2001 at 09:16:07AM -0800, Jon Christopherson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have just compiled a
:>
:>Just to balance this point out;
:>
:>Only the copyright holder can do this, what code of any significance has
:>RMS contributed recently to this or any other project where this would be
:>a consideration?
:
:Uh, people have been signing their copyright over to FSF for a long
:time...
:
:--
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I am aware that certain long-standing RMS-specific projects,
> like emacs, require people who submit patches to sign-over their
> copyright, but I am not aware of people generally signing
> the copyright for their own GPL'd works over to the FSF. RMS
>
The current UHCI driver constructs the bulk transfer queue as a simple
list with a 'terminate' marker on the end. This means that the bulk queue
runs only once per frame period. This is OK for devices with large input
buffers, but in the case of a large transfer to a device with a small
input b
:The way ReiserFS does this is to affix a contract to the CVS change
:submission, or require that the contract be manually affixed to any
:email submissions.
:
:The rights are assigned, with the terms being "in consideration for
:examination of the submission" (it's not a contract unless there is
11 matches
Mail list logo