MEXTFREE results in a call to _mext_free() which is only defined within
subr_mbuf.c, and is not static. Should the prototype be moved into
sys/mbuf.h, or should MEXTFREE be moved into subr_mbuf.c, or is it ok
like this?
Thanks.
--
Chad David[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACNS Inc. Calgary,
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Don't know how interesting this can be, but i am writing
> (no plans to commit it, unless people find it interesting)
> some code to implement a weight-based instead of priority-based
> scheduler. The code is basically the WF2Q+ scheme which is
> already
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:55:37PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote:
> Chad David wrote:
> > Does anybody have an example of how to call MULTI_DRIVER_MODULE? It
> > looks broken to me, but I could of course be wrong...
>
> I would not recommend using it. Just use several DRIVER_MODULE
> declarations as
Chad David wrote:
> Does anybody have an example of how to call MULTI_DRIVER_MODULE? It
> looks broken to me, but I could of course be wrong...
I would not recommend using it. Just use several DRIVER_MODULE
declarations as required. In fact, I think I might remove it since nothing
uses it yet.
Does anybody have an example of how to call MULTI_DRIVER_MODULE? It
looks broken to me, but I could of course be wrong...
Thanks.
--
Chad David[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACNS Inc. Calgary, Alberta Canada
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
This is yesterday's -current.
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; lapic.id =
fault virtual address = 0x114
fault code = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc01b6c40
stack pointer = 0x10:0xf1947cd8
frame pointe
Hmm, -current has same problem. It should fix in -current...
--- Begin Message ---
Hi all,
fxp_stop() of the latest fxp driver do SOFTWARE_RESET when called.
Shouldn't this be SELECTIVE_RESET?
As I'm not familiar with fxp, would someone check and commit it to the
repositry? The current cod
subscribe
--
We got a thousand points of light, For the homeless man
We got a kinder gentler machine gun hand - Neil Young
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
> I can only hope that our illustrious congress has grown as tired of
> spam as I have and will fix the law to simply ban it.
> -Matt
That would help, (most SPAM I receive even in Germany is from USA), but
spammers would move offshore from USA
The latest round of KSE changes are available from
http://www.freebsd.org/~julian/thediff
These changes represent a work in progress.
Basically the state is:
GENERIC compiles
(I don't know yet if it runs but I doubt it.)
The following changes have been made:
The 'thread' structure is no longer
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:53:49AM -0800, Doug White wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Jean Louis Ntakpe wrote:
>
> > Some binaries, especially from the ports tree on my
> > system just failed to start, bringing the message:
> >
> > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol "
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Jean Louis Ntakpe wrote:
> Some binaries, especially from the ports tree on my
> system just failed to start, bringing the message:
>
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdoutp"
>
> Could somebody give me a hint what I'm missing here.
/u
Hi,
Some binaries, especially from the ports tree on my
system just failed to start, bringing the message:
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdoutp"
Could somebody give me a hint what I'm missing here.
Since I couldn't start "cvsup", my system ist somewhat
Don't know how interesting this can be, but i am writing
(no plans to commit it, unless people find it interesting)
some code to implement a weight-based instead of priority-based
scheduler. The code is basically the WF2Q+ scheme which is
already part of dummynet, adapted to processes.
It is quite
On 21-Dec-01 Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
>> > I think pri_native is just an implementation detail which shouldn't
>> > be used or visible to threads. It used used by the priority propagation
>> >
At Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:06:38 -0600 (CST),
Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> >I got a panic with today's current. I don't know I can reproduce this
> >panic or not...
>
> This probably is in:
>
> 1015if (LIST_FIRST(&phd->phd_pcblist) == NULL) {
> 1016LIST_RE
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>
>I got a panic with today's current. I don't know I can reproduce this
>panic or not...
This probably is in:
1015if (LIST_FIRST(&phd->phd_pcblist) == NULL) {
1016LIST_REMOVE(phd, phd_hash);
1017
Hi, I have just managed to repetedly panic -CURRENT... How you ask? I'll tell
you :-D
The short story is "Run a linux version of XFree86," here's the long story:
first, I got the linux version of XFree86, along with all it's driver modules
(compliled under linux of course). Then in /usr/compat
On Fri, 21 Dec 2001, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I think pri_native is just an implementation detail which shouldn't
> > be used or visible to threads. It used used by the priority propagation
> > mechanism to hold the original pri_level.
I got a panic with today's current. I don't know I can reproduce this
panic or not...
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 1; lapic.id = 0100
fault virtual address = 0x14
fault code = supervisor write, page not present
instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02141
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 12:46:40AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I think pri_native is just an implementation detail which shouldn't
> be used or visible to threads. It used used by the priority propagation
> mechanism to hold the original pri_level. Threads should just use their
> original priori
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 20-Dec-01 Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:16:03PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> However, kthreads should tsleep() with their current priority, not PPAUSE.
> >
> > "current" meaning pri_level or pri_native ? What if one tries to
> >
ù³¿Åøò¶g
18Ë¢¨fè
ù}jAK©ù©aJüÓÌgGb`GAL`ÏÔlÈC
y¨300¼zøòy¶'ÈÜ'Gb`z
Ê^tOrA³¿ÅwèZÖ}ù©
ù´ØrfIùsû^±s!
yÆENO1Ìiµ¦}jAbNz
³¿Åêx©Äù©
¢ù±ÆA
Úùvhttp://www.fun-club.net
aJt@N
23 matches
Mail list logo
