Re: Dropping bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk

2001-12-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
: And now I recall. Peter told me that at some : point there will be no sys/modules at all. I'm not objecting. We don't use sys/modules, but do use bsd.kmod.mk to build our drivers outside of the sys tree. Any successor to sys/modules must allow this (ideally with the same makefiles we have no

Re: KSE changes available

2001-12-24 Thread Julian Elischer
what is currently there will probably not compile well, it might compile but I'd be amazed if it ran.. On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Glenn Gombert wrote: > > In case anyone is in interested I have put a patched set of source files > from the latest changes below on my FreeBSD Web page at: > > freeb

Re: KSE changes available

2001-12-24 Thread Julian Elischer
What is at the head of the branch in P4 is a little incomplete while what is in thepatch file was taken at a moment just before I broke it all again :) On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Robert Watson wrote: > For those of us that live in P4-land already, it's just the head of the > KSE branch? Also, for th

Re: KSE changes available

2001-12-24 Thread Robert Watson
For those of us that live in P4-land already, it's just the head of the KSE branch? Also, for those that don't, this is also available via cvsup10. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services On Fri, 21 Dec 2001,

Re: KSE changes available

2001-12-24 Thread Glenn Gombert
In case anyone is in interested I have put a patched set of source files from the latest changes below on my FreeBSD Web page at: freebsd.imatowns.com/kse3 There is the latest set of 'diffs' from the link below broken out for each individual file too, along with the 'unpatched' source fil

Re: Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread Eric Melville
> However, perhaps sysinstall should tell the user that if they have a USB > mouse, they need do nothing, insetad of think 'Uhh, I don't recognise any of > these, lets try this one' and getting it wrong. Before this menu is presented, sysinstall asks if there is a usb mouse or not. I suppose

Re: Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread David Taylor
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, William Ward wrote: > A. Thanks for the answer. > > /William You know, replying below the quoted post makes it a lot easier to reply to both peoples replies, without having to be adept at reading backwards... > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:27:52PM -0800, Eric Melville w

Re: Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread William Ward
A. Thanks for the answer. /William On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:27:52PM -0800, Eric Melville wrote: > > Is /dev/ums0 ommitted from sysinstall for any particular reason? This patch > > adds /dev/ums0 to sysinstall::Configure->Mouse->Port. > > This is intentional. In the case of a usb mouse,

Re: Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread Eric Melville
> Is /dev/ums0 ommitted from sysinstall for any particular reason? This patch > adds /dev/ums0 to sysinstall::Configure->Mouse->Port. This is intentional. In the case of a usb mouse, usbd is responsible for starting moused. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebs

Re: Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread William Ward
Thanks Joe. I managed to screw up my first patch posted to any mailing list. Hehe. Maybe it's supposed to work that way. --- menus.c.old Mon Dec 24 13:54:18 2001 +++ menus.c Mon Dec 24 13:55:49 2001 @@ -387,6 +387,8 @@ dmenuVarCheck, dmenuSetVariable, NULL, VAR_MOUSED_PORT "=/dev/c

Add USB mouse to sysinstall

2001-12-24 Thread William Ward
Is /dev/ums0 ommitted from sysinstall for any particular reason? This patch adds /dev/ums0 to sysinstall::Configure->Mouse->Port. Patch to /usr/src/release/sysinstall/menus.c. *** menus.c Mon Dec 24 13:55:49 2001 --- menus.c.old Mon Dec 24 13:54:18 2001 *** *** 387,394

Can we use this ? Linux Interrupt Latency benchmark

2001-12-24 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/andrea/lil Maybe we can port this and use it to see where the latency actually happens ? See also this posting: http://groups.google.com/groups?q=latency+interrupt+linux&hl=en&rnum=5&selm=Pine.LNX.3.96.980827184103.250A-10%40dragon.bogus Martin Mar

Re: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Martin Blapp wrote: > As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for netstat -f inet. > Has the support been dropped ? > > Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal netstat output. I > cannot see any tpc4 connections anymore. > > I noted this in 4.5 PR

Brand New AAA Credit! -oari

2001-12-24 Thread sorby2777
Title: Instantly Get a Brand New AAA Credit Profile in 24 Hours! Here's How You Can Have a Brand New Credit Profile in 24 Hours! The Best Part is... It's 100% Legal, 100% Ethical, and Fully GUARANTEED! Dear Friend, Do you have bad credit, judgements, bankruptcies or any other credit problems?

Solved: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread Martin Blapp
> Works fine. Hi, I guess the world is not 100% up to date. I seems that I just got this after running a cvsup 2 hours later after the initial one. Shit happens. Thanks for the answer and sorry. Martin To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t

Re: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 08:06:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:01:19PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for > > > netstat

Re: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread carl
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:01:19PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for > > netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ? > > I also don't get any output. carbon

Re: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread carl
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > Hi All, > > As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for > netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ? Incorrect. > Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal > netstat output. I cannot see any tpc4 connecti

Re: netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > > Hi All, > > As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for > netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ? I also don't get any output. > Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal > netstat output. I cannot

netstat -f inet broken ?

2001-12-24 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi All, As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ? Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal netstat output. I cannot see any tpc4 connections anymore. I noted this in 4.5 PRERELEASE too. It used to work in 4.3 RELEASE and

Re: Logitech iFeel Optical USB Mouse cannot be attached.

2001-12-24 Thread Raman Ng
The following is the output of usbdevs -v # usbdevs -v Controller /dev/usb0: addr 1: self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), rev 0x0100 port 1 powered port 2 powered Regards, Raman - Original Message - From: "Doug White" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jon Parise" <[EMAIL

Re: Intel 82544GC Gigabit support?

2001-12-24 Thread Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
> > does anyone know if this is/will be supported? > > I believe it is supported by the "em" driver, which has been in > -current for a few weeks and was recently merged into -stable. Thanks. It works! -- Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA Computers are like air conditioners. They stop

Re: 2>&1 in /bin/sh

2001-12-24 Thread 豊永 達人
From: Mike Barcroft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: 2>&1 in /bin/sh Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 01:42:26 -0500 > KT Sin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Just ran make world this morning and 2>&1 fd redirection stopped working > > for /bin/sh. > > > > $ ls /bad/file > /dev/null 2>&1 > > ls: /bad/file:

Re: Dropping bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk

2001-12-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:05:39AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk, > > because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is > > the right direction. :-) > > We use it slightly at Timing Solutions, but it is more of a pain than > a blessing.

Re: msgdef breaks world

2001-12-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 09:47:37AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 09:32:53AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > UA.ISO8859-5/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES > > install: /usr/share/locale/uk_UA.ISO8859-5/LC_MESSAGES/SYS_LC_MESSAGES: \ > > No such > > file or directory > > *** Error co

Re: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/lib/libutil.so.3: Undefined symbol "__stdoutp"

2001-12-24 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:03:34AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > Warner, could you please add "__stdoutp" to the 20010919 entry, and > > a hint to put COMPAT4X=true to /etc/make.conf to the 20010924 entry? > > Actually, you only need the first one. You don't need COMPAT4X=true > all the time,