On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:03:34AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
Warner, could you please add __stdoutp to the 20010919 entry, and
a hint to put COMPAT4X=true to /etc/make.conf to the 20010924 entry?
Actually, you only need the first one. You don't need COMPAT4X=true
all the time, so I'm
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:05:39AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk,
because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is
the right direction. :-)
We use it slightly at Timing Solutions, but it is more of a pain than
a blessing. More of
From: Mike Barcroft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: 21 in /bin/sh
Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 01:42:26 -0500
KT Sin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just ran make world this morning and 21 fd redirection stopped working
for /bin/sh.
$ ls /bad/file /dev/null 21
ls: /bad/file: No such file or
does anyone know if this is/will be supported?
I believe it is supported by the em driver, which has been in
-current for a few weeks and was recently merged into -stable.
Thanks. It works!
--
Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk, MCSE, MCNE, CLS, LCA
Computers are like air conditioners.
They stop
The following is the output of usbdevs -v
# usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x), VIA(0x), rev
0x0100
port 1 powered
port 2 powered
Regards,
Raman
- Original Message -
From: Doug White [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jon Parise [EMAIL
Hi All,
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for
netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ?
Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal
netstat output. I cannot see any tpc4 connections anymore.
I noted this in 4.5 PRERELEASE too. It used to work in
4.3 RELEASE and
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi All,
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for
netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ?
I also don't get any output.
Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal
netstat output. I cannot see
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi All,
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for
netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ?
Incorrect.
Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal
netstat output. I cannot see any tpc4 connections
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:01:19PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi All,
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for
netstat -f inet. Has the support been dropped ?
I also don't get any output.
carbon netstat -f
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 08:06:06AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:01:19PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 02:02:00PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi All,
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for
netstat -f inet. Has the
Works fine.
Hi,
I guess the world is not 100% up to date. I seems that I just got
this after running a cvsup 2 hours later after the initial one.
Shit happens.
Thanks for the answer and sorry.
Martin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the
Title: Instantly Get a Brand New AAA Credit Profile in 24 Hours!
Here's How You Can Have
a Brand New
Credit Profile in 24 Hours!
The
Best Part is... It's 100% Legal, 100% Ethical, and Fully GUARANTEED!
Dear Friend,
Do you have bad credit,
judgements, bankruptcies or
any other credit
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Martin Blapp wrote:
As we just have noted, there is no output anymore for netstat -f inet.
Has the support been dropped ?
Also there are only unix domain sockets in the normal netstat output. I
cannot see any tpc4 connections anymore.
I noted this in 4.5
Hi all,
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/people/andrea/lil
Maybe we can port this and use it to see where the
latency actually happens ?
See also this posting:
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=latency+interrupt+linuxhl=enrnum=5selm=Pine.LNX.3.96.980827184103.250A-10%40dragon.bogus
Martin
Thanks Joe. I managed to screw up my first patch posted to any
mailing list. Hehe. Maybe it's supposed to work that way.
--- menus.c.old Mon Dec 24 13:54:18 2001
+++ menus.c Mon Dec 24 13:55:49 2001
@@ -387,6 +387,8 @@
dmenuVarCheck, dmenuSetVariable, NULL, VAR_MOUSED_PORT
Is /dev/ums0 ommitted from sysinstall for any particular reason? This patch
adds /dev/ums0 to sysinstall::Configure-Mouse-Port.
This is intentional. In the case of a usb mouse, usbd is responsible for
starting moused.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
A. Thanks for the answer.
/William
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:27:52PM -0800, Eric Melville wrote:
Is /dev/ums0 ommitted from sysinstall for any particular reason? This patch
adds /dev/ums0 to sysinstall::Configure-Mouse-Port.
This is intentional. In the case of a usb mouse, usbd is
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, William Ward wrote:
A. Thanks for the answer.
/William
You know, replying below the quoted post makes it a lot easier to reply to
both peoples replies, without having to be adept at reading backwards...
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:27:52PM -0800, Eric Melville
However, perhaps sysinstall should tell the user that if they have a USB
mouse, they need do nothing, insetad of think 'Uhh, I don't recognise any of
these, lets try this one' and getting it wrong.
Before this menu is presented, sysinstall asks if there is a usb mouse or
not. I suppose
In case anyone is in interested I have put a patched set of source files
from the latest changes below on my FreeBSD Web page at:
freebsd.imatowns.com/kse3
There is the latest set of 'diffs' from the link below broken out for
each individual file too, along with the 'unpatched' source
For those of us that live in P4-land already, it's just the head of the
KSE branch? Also, for those that don't, this is also available via
cvsup10.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Fri, 21 Dec
What is at the head of the branch in P4 is a little incomplete while what
is in thepatch file was taken at a moment just before I broke it all again
:)
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Robert Watson wrote:
For those of us that live in P4-land already, it's just the head of the
KSE branch? Also, for
what is currently there will probably not compile
well, it might compile but I'd be amazed if it ran..
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Glenn Gombert wrote:
In case anyone is in interested I have put a patched set of source files
from the latest changes below on my FreeBSD Web page at:
: And now I recall. Peter told me that at some
: point there will be no sys/modules at all.
I'm not objecting. We don't use sys/modules, but do use bsd.kmod.mk
to build our drivers outside of the sys tree. Any successor to
sys/modules must allow this (ideally with the same makefiles we have
24 matches
Mail list logo
