Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote: > I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch > which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed > twice in the Heimdal code. > > Unfortunately,

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : > You should: > : > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) > : > : Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj > : (what directory should it b

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Alexander N. Kabaev
I had this problem with telnet some time ago. See PR bin/32591 at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/32591 for a patch which fixes the problem for me. The memory block is being freed twice in the Heimdal code. Unfortunately, PR got no attention whatsoever for over a month now. It is

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 07:43:43PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: > > You should: > > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) > > Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj > (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file > either which I assume is a

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Vincent Poy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > You should: : > ln -sf aj /etc/malloc.conf (As ROOT) : : Hmmm, what does that do exactly? I don't have a file name aj : (what directory should it be in?) and I don't have a /etc/malloc.conf file : eithe

Re: telnetd broken in -CURRENT

2002-01-28 Thread Vincent Poy
On Mon, 28 Jan 2002, Siwei Liu wrote: > ? ??? 28 ?? 2002 07:15?Vincent Poy ??? > > I'm using KRB4/KRB5 in make.conf when building the latest -current > > sources, telnetd appears to be broken. > > > > vince@pele [9:14pm][~] >> telnet localhost > > Trying 127.0.0.1... > > Connected to localhost.WU

Re: Interesting syscons behaviour - [followup]

2002-01-28 Thread Jim Bryant
Yeah, I'm also using the SMP kernel. Dan Nelson wrote: > In the last episode (Jan 28), Jim Bryant said: > >>Oh yeah, I immediately did a shutdown with reboot, and the problem >>did not duplicate itself. >> >>Jim Bryant wrote: >> >> >>>After upgrading -current, then reverting back to the previou

Re: Interesting syscons behaviour - [followup]

2002-01-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Jan 28), Jim Bryant said: > Oh yeah, I immediately did a shutdown with reboot, and the problem > did not duplicate itself. > > Jim Bryant wrote: > > >After upgrading -current, then reverting back to the previous [more > >stable] kernel, upon rebooting after reverting, I not

Re: Interesting syscons behaviour - [followup]

2002-01-28 Thread Jim Bryant
Oh yeah, I immediately did a shutdown with reboot, and the problem did not duplicate itself. Jim Bryant wrote: > After upgrading -current, then reverting back to the previous [more > stable] kernel, upon rebooting after reverting, I noticed the oddest > thing on ttyv0. Apparently, after /etc

Interesting syscons behaviour.

2002-01-28 Thread Jim Bryant
After upgrading -current, then reverting back to the previous [more stable] kernel, upon rebooting after reverting, I noticed the oddest thing on ttyv0. Apparently, after /etc/rc took over in init all of the text was still in the kernel color scheme. FreeBSD wahoo.kc.rr.com 5.0-CURRENT FreeBS

Re: Processes hanging in ``inode' state

2002-01-28 Thread Garrett Wollman
< I noticed it since last summer, too. Using both vi and vile. I have not seen it recently. My most recent crashes all involve triple-faults. A new machine, running very fresh -current, hasn't been up for long enough to evoke this bug. (It did spend much of the last 96 hours compiling crappy

WARNING. You sent a potential virus or unauthorized code

2002-01-28 Thread alert
Message details and virus information To help identify the email: The message was titled: current-digest V5 #362 The message date was: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 08:41:57 -0800 (PST) T

new photos from my party!

2002-01-28 Thread phar . Francois
Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com M35J0``,$__\``+@`0``` M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`

new photos from my party!

2002-01-28 Thread phar . Francois
Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com M35J0``,$__\``+@`0``` M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`

new photos from my party!

2002-01-28 Thread michel . mergaerts
Hello! My party... It was absolutely amazing! I have attached my web page with new photos! If you can please make color prints of my photos. Thanks! begin 666 www.myparty.yahoo.com M35J0``,$__\``+@`0``` M@`X?N@X`M`G-(;@!3,TA5&AIP$`

Re: No buffer space available

2002-01-28 Thread Terry Lambert
Shizuka Kudo wrote: > Thanks for your response. I wonder if I misunderstand > your advice. When looking at the if_rl.c (dated Dec > 14), there's already a timer attached to > ifp->if_watchdog. Is this the timer you referred to? > If so, it looks like this timer never called by the > driver in my c

problem with pam in login

2002-01-28 Thread Alexander Yeremenko
I'm running virgin 4-5-RC #1. In /etc/pam.conf i have login authsufficient pam_skey.so login authrequisite pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so login authrequiredpam_unix.so try_first_pass ány attempt to login causes syslog : log