In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes:
>The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
>If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the
>DP), it sounds like we should just turn it off.
>
>Unless there is strong objection, I plan on committing
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 06:40:21PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Surely, you're joking. No wonder it's a PITA
> to convince a 3rd party vendor to release a
> FreeBSD product.
Please don't misinterpret David's words. 3rd party apps are not
our *primary* concern, FreeBSD is. And note that in this
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 06:40:21PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:34:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > As FreeBSD developers, 3rd party code cannot
> > be our primary concern.
>
> Surely, you're joking. No wonder it's a PITA
> to convince a 3rd party vendor to r
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:34:57PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> As FreeBSD developers, 3rd party code cannot
> be our primary concern.
>
Surely, you're joking. No wonder it's a PITA
to convince a 3rd party vendor to release a
FreeBSD product.
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAI
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 04:09:27PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> If I remember correctly, it was the plan all along that releases would
> not have AJ turned on by default.
>
> The real question is: should the patch stay in after the release is
> rolled? Has the AJ default outliv
On 2002-03-23 17:10, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Well, 'current' has spoken I guess! :-)
>
> :From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> :To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Damn, I knew we shouldn't make current too smart.
Now we'll have to find names for 5.0-RELEASE like 'Wintermute' etc.
Giorgos Keramida
Well, 'current' has spoken I guess! :-)
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 4:34 PM -0800 3/23/02, David wrote:
>On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > I think we should keep AJ enabled until at least DP2. It has
> > found bugs in the past, and I suspect that a lot of new code
> > is going in between now and then.
>
>Robert Watson
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: [ WARNING, From: let to the list to deal with ignorant MUA's ]
Or MUA's that don't meet your expectations.
: On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[ WARNING, From: let to the list to deal with ignorant MUA's ]
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 05:23:35PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
> : If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not usef
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
: If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the
: DP), it sounds like we should just turn it off.
:
: Unless there is s
If I remember correctly, it was the plan all along that releases would
not have AJ turned on by default.
The real question is: should the patch stay in after the release is
rolled? Has the AJ default outlived its usefulness in general?
-Ma
I've just upgraded my i386-current box from about March 13 to
a snapshot from late last night. Now when I run vmware, the
vmware program dies with:
VMware Workstation PANIC: BUG F(571):1607 bugNr=2302
when I try to "Power on" some virtual machine. When I got in
today, I cvsup'ed again, rem
The RE's are wanting to ship 5.0 DP#1 w/this patch applied.
If having 'AJ' by default is deemed not useful (by being removed from the
DP), it sounds like we should just turn it off.
Unless there is strong objection, I plan on committing this.
Index: malloc.c
=
At 2:54 PM -0600 3/23/02, Jim Bryant wrote:
>last cvsup, less than an hour ago.
>
>
I started with an empty obj-tree, and I ended up with an error
from make being unable to make smbus.h
In my case, I just reversed the change which made version 1.3 of:
http://www.freebsd.
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 09:23:33AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
> > -current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
>
> Could you run the actual
just built a -current GENERIC with a patch below. Do not know is it
correct or not though.
Index: Makefile
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/modules/bktr/bktr/Makefile,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -u -r1.3 Makefile
--- Makefile
Le 23 Mar 02 à 1:20:20 +, Kris Kennaway écrivait :
> Please let me know if you think there's something wrong with an error
> log; i.e. you think the port should actually compile and something
> went wrong on bento.
There are two "depend object" errors with imp & imp-devel. They should
be fix
last cvsup, less than an hour ago.
cc -c -O -g -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -ansi -nostdinc -I- -I. -I../../.. -I../../../dev
-I../../../contrib/de
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Andrew R. Reiter wrote:
:On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
::I wouldn't worry about the messages. They are debugging printfs that
::should really be beind boot verbose or something similar.
:
:Are there enough debug printfs that would warrant a sysctl tunable for
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Andrew R. Reiter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:
: :I wouldn't worry about the messages. They are debugging printfs that
: :should really be beind boot verbose or something similar.
:
: Are there enough deb
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
:I wouldn't worry about the messages. They are debugging printfs that
:should really be beind boot verbose or something similar.
Are there enough debug printfs that would warrant a sysctl tunable for
debug messages?
Andrew
:
:Thanks for the info, how
I wouldn't worry about the messages. They are debugging printfs that
should really be beind boot verbose or something similar.
Thanks for the info, however.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Afetr building, booting, and doing some reality checks with today's
-CURRENT on my laptop, I issued the command sequence
sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p
in order to prepare it to (default to) boot from slice 1 (which has
today's -STABLE on it) and power the machine off (the latter
Anyone have any ideas? I'm trying to build the latest -current
(from cvs) on an alpha running 4.3-RELEASE, using 'make buildworld'.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<[EMAIL PROTEC
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
> -current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
> I've tried for the last week has either been broken or does not
> build). One of the client machines panicked after
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 10:11:25AM -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
> sgk> Cvsup was run this morning (23 Mar 02) at 0623 PST.
> sgk> After the standard "make" sequence and installation
> sgk> of a new kernel. The following appears during the
> sgk> boot process (apologies for long lines).
>
sgk> Cvsup was run this morning (23 Mar 02) at 0623 PST.
sgk> After the standard "make" sequence and installation
sgk> of a new kernel. The following appears during the
sgk> boot process (apologies for long lines).
sgk> Mar 23 09:04:30 12-230-81-20 sm-queue[181]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): fill_fd:
Hello,
After this commit 'device ether' is mandatory if ever there is no any
ethernet or token-ring devices.
| luigi 2002/02/18 14:50:13 PST
|
| Modified files:
|sys/net if.c
| Log:
| When the local link address is changed, send out gratuitous ARPs
| to notify other n
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 12:41:58AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
> -current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
Could you run the actual DP#1 code? This would make sure the packages
match the snapshot, and mo
Cvsup was run this morning (23 Mar 02) at 0623 PST.
After the standard "make" sequence and installation
of a new kernel. The following appears during the
boot process (apologies for long lines).
Mar 23 09:04:30 12-230-81-20 sm-queue[181]: NOQUEUE: SYSERR(root): fill_fd: before
readcf: fd 1 no
I think I've run into this pre-UMA, so suspect it's not a UMA panic. I
could be wrong.
Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project
[EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services
On Sat, 23 Mar 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> I upgraded the bento package buildin
Fri Mar 22 19:06:37 CET 2002
FreeBSD/alpha (ds10.wbnet) (ttyd0)
login: syslogd: /var/log/auth.log: No such file or directory
syslogd: /var/log/auth.log: No such file or directory
Mar 22 21:55:23 ds10 kernel: pid 27885 (telnetd), uid 0: exited on signal 11
(co
re dumped)
Mar 22 21:55:30 ds10
On Sat, Mar 23, 2002 at 01:03:01AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> With the 5.0 Developer Preview snapshot just around the corner it's
> very important that we get as many ports building as possible. There
> are a *lot* of easily fixed compilation errors under 5.0 (for example,
> over
Hi all,
With the 5.0 Developer Preview snapshot just around the corner it's
very important that we get as many ports building as possible. There
are a *lot* of easily fixed compilation errors under 5.0 (for example,
over a hundred ports are still broken because of ). In
total there are several
I upgraded the bento package building cluster to a more recent
-current to try and get packages building again (every other snapshot
I've tried for the last week has either been broken or does not
build). One of the client machines panicked after about an hour under
load:
The kernel and coredump
Of course that should be an A7M266D...
(its friday, my brain is fried and i think i need to take a sauna...)
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Lamont Granquist wrote:
> GENERIC works, so this looks like an SMP problem.
>
> Its happening right after the CPU initializes. This is probably the first
> SMP code
Which mobo/chipset ?
* Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020323 02:14]:
>
> I just cvsupped about an hour ago, built world and built a kernel that was
> GENERIC with 486/586 turned off and SMP and IOAPIC turned on. It crashed
> while trying to mount root. Apologies for mistakes in the fol
38 matches
Mail list logo
