Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 04:36:41AM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: modules and doesn't clobber your old 4.x modules. I asked David to put libpam and the PAM modules in COMPAT4X, but never heard back from him. I guess I need clarification. Since PAM modules aren't versioned, is there a

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:16:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Ok, I put the following in /usr/lib/compat, from my releng_4 box: libc.so.4 libc_r.a libc_r.so.4 libpam.a libpam.so.1 libpam_ssh.a There is no need for .a's in /usr/lib/compat -- think about it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 4 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:16:22PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: Ok, I put the following in /usr/lib/compat, from my releng_4 box: libc.so.4 libc_r.a libc_r.so.4 libpam.a libpam.so.1 libpam_ssh.a There is no need for .a's in /usr/lib/compat

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist.c

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 07:49:50AM -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote: sobomax 2002/05/04 07:49:50 PDT Modified files: usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist.c Log: Add ability to

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

2002-05-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi all, The problem must have been introduced after April, 3. I've a kernel.old from this date which runs perfectly. Maybe this can help to track the bug down. Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ImproWare

Re: CURRENT and P-IV problems

2002-05-05 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I have to take back that a kernel from april 3. runs fine. It happens there too, but few times than on recent current. The build lives for 5 minutes, instead of 30 seconds. Then I get a SIG4 as usual and cc crashes. Anybody has a idea to which date I can switch back to have my problem

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so) [dlerror: Cannot open /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so] adding faulty module: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so) [dlerror: Cannot open /usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so] adding faulty

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plist

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Hmm, really strange. I can't reproduce it here. Are you sure that you have recompiled all of pkg_install, i.e. both libraries and utilities? -Maxim --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
-On [20020504 20:15], Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: It is only here that warnings are treated as errors. I am thinking something in the upgrade path is not 100% thought out, trying to see what exactly, but my focus has been way more on STABLE than CURRENT, so some more exposed

Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info info.h main.c perform.c pkg_info.1 show.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/lib lib.h plistOR

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Sobolev
OOPS, sorry, should be fixed now. Mea culpa. -Maxim Hmm, really strange. I can't reproduce it here. Are you sure that you have recompiled all of pkg_install, i.e. both libraries and utilities? -Maxim --zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Szilveszter Adam
Hello, src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 by Bill Fenner. It appears that a new magic value, KERNELDUMPMAGIC_CLEARED, has been introduced but its value never #define-d in (probably) src/sys/sys/kerneldump.h. This way, the program does not compile. There is

Re: savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Maxime Henrion
Szilveszter Adam wrote: Hello, src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 by Bill Fenner. This is fixed in revision 1.4 of src/sys/sys/kerneldump.h. Cheers, Maxime To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of

Re: savecore.c broken now, breaks world

2002-05-05 Thread Maxim Konovalov
On 15:17+0200, May 5, 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote: Hello, src/sbin/savecore.c has been broken today, with the commit of rev 1.59 by Bill Fenner. It appears that a new magic value, KERNELDUMPMAGIC_CLEARED, has been introduced but its value never #define-d in (probably)

X don't accept anything from keyboard

2002-05-05 Thread Tomi Vainio - Sun Finland -
I'm running current cvsupped two days ago. This time my X broke down. It don't accept anything from keyboard. Situation is same when using xdm or startx. I think last working world build was done two weeks ago. XFree86-4.2.0 was built 30.3.2002 and I already tried to built X-server from

Would You Like To Look Feel 10-20 Years Younger?? 3237l4

2002-05-05 Thread alconte
Warning Unable to process data: multipart/mixed;boundary==_NextPart_000_00B7_16C07C6E.A3114E54

Crash when attaching usb ethernet

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
I've got a Seimens SpeedStream USB - Ethernet adapter that when I plug into my laptop (built -CURRENT yesterday), it always crashes. Here's the info: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0xdeadc0e2 fault code = supervisor read, page not present

Re: Crash when attaching usb ethernet

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Gordon Tetlow wrote: I've got a Seimens SpeedStream USB - Ethernet adapter that when I plug into my laptop (built -CURRENT yesterday), it always crashes. Here's the info: snip... Of course, after a quick search, I find the thread that Joe has about the usb subsystem.

UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Doug Barton
With yesterday's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 FYI. -- We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power.

Re: UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Gordon Tetlow
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Doug Barton wrote: With yesterday's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 FYI. Here's another from

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving from older versions to newer versions of CURRENT. Can you track down what the actual cause of

Re: UMA lock order reversal

2002-05-05 Thread Hiten Pandya
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Doug Barton wrote: With yesterday's -current: lock order reversal 1st 0xcc5987a4 DIRHASH (UMA zone) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:297 2nd 0xc76c2224 PCPU 256 (UMA cpu) @ /usr/Local/src-current/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1630 I see the same one when I run

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
-On [20020506 00:30], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. Nor do we, by default, advocate NO_WERROR. So in effect, we broke moving from older versions to newer

Re: Breaking old compilation paths

2002-05-05 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 07:31:30AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: -On [20020506 00:30], Kris Kennaway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 02:42:22PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote: I definately do not call libiberty kernel related. Nor do we, by default, advocate

Re: xdm broken on current

2002-05-05 Thread Doug Barton
On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so) [dlerror: Cannot open /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so] adding faulty module: /usr/lib/pam_nologin.so unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_opieaccess.so) [dlerror: Cannot