Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers?

2002-05-10 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 07:41, Mark Murray wrote: On Thu, 2002-05-09 at 03:57, Mark Murray wrote: /usr/sbin/rmuser Wrapper round pw userdel? I took this one while the discussion was going on the past couple of days. It's at: http://home.pacbell.net/makonnen/rmuser.sh It also

Re: Resolution (Was: Re: The future of perl on FreeBSD)

2002-05-10 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Thu, 09 May 2002 10:13:04 MST, Terry Lambert wrote: Uh, csh. Preferrably with tcsh extensions, so it won't run anywhere else. In a pinch, I guess you could use bash. cackles maniacally, and ducks Poul-Henning was too kind. You shouldn't be banned from the lists, you should be taken

Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers?

2002-05-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:56:16AM -0600, Mike Makonnen wrote: The problem with writing man pages is, if you don't do it often enough you keep having to relearn it every time you do (which is why I wised up /usr/share/examples/mdoc/example.{1,3,4} To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers?

2002-05-10 Thread Mike Makonnen
On Fri, 2002-05-10 at 02:56, David O'Brien wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:56:16AM -0600, Mike Makonnen wrote: The problem with writing man pages is, if you don't do it often enough you keep having to relearn it every time you do (which is why I wised up

Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers?

2002-05-10 Thread Michael Lucas
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:56:16AM -0600, Mike Makonnen wrote: The problem with writing man pages is, if you don't do it often enough you keep having to relearn it every time you do (which is why I wised up after about the third time or so this happened to me I created a cheat sheet). What

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Is there a reason for it, or this just a not-yet-implemented feature? It certainly seems like the latter -- why make the user jump through all the sorting/reordering hoops? Generally, this won't be necessary for properly organized code. The code in question is organized by software

kernel panic after mount_ext2fs

2002-05-10 Thread walt
This is a new problem beginning after a buildworld and build kernel yesterday, May 08 (still the old gcc 2.95.4): The system is quite stable until I mount an ext2 partition and attempt to list its directory. Immediately I get this error: syncing disks... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy. If

Re: HEADS UP - gcc-3.1 in progress!

2002-05-10 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-05-09 23:02, Peter Wemm wrote: John Baldwin wrote: So how many cases of beer does O'Brien get at Usenix now? :) Quite a few. :-) Let's not force him to join AAA before 5.0-RELEASE though. - Giorgos To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-10 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 01:54:50AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: obrien 2002/05/10 01:54:50 PDT Modified files: gnu/lib/csu Makefile gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile gnu/lib/libibertyMakefile gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile gnu/lib/libstdc++

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikhail Teterin wrote: Is there a reason for it, or this just a not-yet-implemented feature? It certainly seems like the latter -- why make the user jump through all the sorting/reordering hoops? Generally, this won't be necessary for properly organized code. The code in question

Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
After a cvsup of 10 minutes ago either on 5.0-CURRENT and on 4.6-PRERELEASE (both of May 8, 02:46 CEST) making a # make clean into /usr/ports/deve/gettext spawn zillions(!) of make process, lead to cpu load average at 96.xx before a reboot :-( Up to yesterday it works. Doing this into others

RE: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 10-May-2002 (17:01:26/GMT) Riccardo Torrini wrote: into /usr/ports/deve/gettext s/deve/devel/ I use make clean to show dependencies before install/update. No, I don't use neither pkg_update nor portupgrade. Riccardo. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (May 10), Riccardo Torrini said: After a cvsup of 10 minutes ago either on 5.0-CURRENT and on 4.6-PRERELEASE (both of May 8, 02:46 CEST) making a # make clean into /usr/ports/deve/gettext spawn zillions(!) of make process, lead to cpu load average at 96.xx before a

Re: Perl scripts that need rewriting - Progress!

2002-05-10 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, On Thu, 09 May 2002 20:33:22 +0100 Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: mark /usr/sbin/scriptdump This script is from KAME. It seems that NetBSD doesn't install it. Is someone actually using it? If okay, I'll change to don't install it. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Garrett Rooney
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:26:56PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (May 10), Riccardo Torrini said: After a cvsup of 10 minutes ago either on 5.0-CURRENT and on 4.6-PRERELEASE (both of May 8, 02:46 CEST) making a # make clean into /usr/ports/deve/gettext spawn

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 10-May-2002 (17:26:56/GMT) Dan Nelson wrote: After a cvsup of 10 minutes ago either on 5.0-CURRENT and on 4.6-PRERELEASE (both of May 8, 02:46 CEST) making a # make clean into /usr/ports/deve/gettext spawn zillions(!) of make process, lead to cpu load average at 96.xx before a reboot

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 10-May-2002 (17:31:32/GMT) Garrett Rooney wrote: there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat, which depends on gmake, which depends on gettext. it's a known problem, and is being worked on. Ok, thanks. Sorry for alarm but I don't see

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Garrett Rooney
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 07:41:44PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote: On 10-May-2002 (17:31:32/GMT) Garrett Rooney wrote: there's a circular dependency that was just introduced to gettext. gettext now depends on expat, which depends on gmake, which depends on gettext. it's a known problem,

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Friday 10 May 2002 12:51 pm, Terry Lambert wrote: = Mikhail Teterin wrote: =Is there a reason for it, or this just a not-yet-implemented =feature? It certainly seems like the latter -- why make the user =jump through all the sorting/reordering hoops? = = Generally, this won't be

Re: Who broke 'make clean' for ports ?

2002-05-10 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 10-May-2002 (17:44:21/GMT) Garrett Rooney wrote: Ok, thanks. Sorry for alarm but I don't see any message before my own. Can I back-cvsup to a stable date? When (sh)it happens? the change is just a few hours old. you can just remove expat2 from the LIB_DEPENDS in

bin/cp breaks world

2002-05-10 Thread Steven G. Kargl
=== bin/cp cc -O -pipe -march=k6 -DVM_AND_BUFFER_CACHE_SYNCHRONIZED -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -Wformat=2 -Wno-format-extra-args -Werror -c /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c cc1: warnings being treated as errors /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c: In function `copy': /home/src/bin/cp/cp.c:275:

FYI: breakage in libpam

2002-05-10 Thread Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine
cvsup'd @ 7:37am EDT 10 May ... 14256 cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam -I/usr/src/lib/libpam/libpam/../../../contrib/openpam/include -DLIB_MAJ=2 -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings

FYI: don't use -j with buildworld right now

2002-05-10 Thread Robert Watson
Since the gcc upgrade, -j on buildworld seems to be temporarily out of order. Try building without it. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Project [EMAIL PROTECTED] NAI Labs, Safeport Network Services To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: FYI: don't use -j with buildworld right now

2002-05-10 Thread Robert Watson
And FYI, compiling with NO_WERROR=yes in make.conf is also a good idea right now, unless you're in the mood to fix warnings that appeared with the gcc upgrade due to changed gcc warnings. (Many of have been doing this for a while since the -Werror stuff with the kernel) Robert N M Watson

Serial Console Speed

2002-05-10 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, I read here http://www.freebsd.org/smp/index.html in the known bugs section that Serial gdb does not work at 115200 baud. I found no open reports in the gnats database at the main site. Is this statement still true for current? Going to try gcc 3.1 :). regards, Galen Sampson

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikhail Teterin wrote: = For my information: Why didn't you take John De Bowsky's advice to: = = ld $objlist `lorder $liblist | tsort -q` I tried that before I asked on the mailing list the first time. It did reduce the number of the undefined symbols, but not to zero. It's

Re: Serial Console Speed

2002-05-10 Thread Alexander Kabaev
Serial console and remote GDB were working just fine for me ever since that entry has been added to the task SMPng unresolved issues list. -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Fix order of directories in rc.shutdown

2002-05-10 Thread Gordon Tetlow
The enclosed patch fixes the order of script execution so the directory order is also reversed. The current behavior is to have directories traversed in the same order as at startup, but have the scripts in the directories reversed. I just changed it so it builds the script list forward (like

Re: Serial Console Speed

2002-05-10 Thread John Baldwin
On 10-May-2002 Alexander Kabaev wrote: Serial console and remote GDB were working just fine for me ever since that entry has been added to the task SMPng unresolved issues list. At 115200? -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ Power Users Use the Power to Serve!

Re: Serial Console Speed

2002-05-10 Thread Alexander Kabaev
At 115200? I have BOOT_COMCONSOLE_SPEED= 115200 in my make.conf and CONSPEED=115200 in kernel config files on two -CURRENT boxes. GDB and console are working fine between 1.2GHz Atlon and older PII IBM ThinkPad. On Fri, 10 May 2002 17:43:14 -0400 (EDT) John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

make.conf and -CURRENT

2002-05-10 Thread Jeff Ito
Hello, Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps something that I have messed up on my end? I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* does not contain said file, the only place it does exist is in

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Mikhail Teterin
On Friday 10 May 2002 04:35 pm, Terry Lambert wrote: = Mikhail Teterin wrote: = = For my information: Why didn't you take John De Bowsky's advice to: = = = = ld $objlist `lorder $liblist | tsort -q` = = I tried that before I asked on the mailing list the first time. It = did reduce

Re: make.conf and -CURRENT

2002-05-10 Thread Brooks Davis
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote: Hello, Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps something that I have messed up on my end? I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* does

RE: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Don Bowman
Order-dependency on the link command line has been common behaviour in linkers forever as far as I know. This includes the FSF GNU linker, as well as the system linker shipped with Unix systems. It is a useful feature, allowing one to insert other objects in front, e.g. to override 'malloc'

** HEADS UP ** if you have problems buliding the new GCC

2002-05-10 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] Due to the way CVS works, it sometimes does not notice when we do repository surgery. We now have one of those times for src/contrib/gcc. So, if you have trouble building the new GCC w/o -j (dies in

Some ports fail on -current because ${BINOWN} and ${BINGRP} seems to be not defined

2002-05-10 Thread Oliver Braun
Hi, I am currently checking bento's port building errors on -current. I have found some ports, e.g. audio/cam [1], that could not be installed because ${BINOWN} and ${BINGRP} seems to be not defined. They end up with the error: install: -g: Invalid argument coming from things like:

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Mikhail Teterin wrote: = Most linkers don't do what you want, which is make up for programmer = incompetence by doing an automatic topological sort on all symbol = dependencies, regardless of where or in what type of file the symbol = is defined, because most linkers treat archives and

Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/lib/csu Makefile src/gnu/lib/libgcc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libiberty Makefile src/gnu/lib/libobjc Makefile src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ Makefile config.h src/gnu/lib/libsupc++ Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/cc Makefile Makefile.fe Makefile.inc ...

2002-05-10 Thread David O'Brien
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:04:27PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Bmake bits for Gcc 3.1. This also vanished my YACC building fixes and broke world while attempting to build `cc1plus' in a cross-tools stage. The changes below fix this and CLEANFILES. These changes are wrong. RCS

Re: does the order of .a files matter?

2002-05-10 Thread Terry Lambert
Don Bowman wrote: Now, I suggest stopping the flame war, or take it somewhere else, this really doesn't have anything to do with FreeBSD. Yeah; it looks like he was really looking for an explanation of the failure of the OSF toolchain, and might not even be compiling on FreeBSD at all in the

Re: make.conf and -CURRENT

2002-05-10 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote: Hello, Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps something that I have messed up on my end? I have run cvsup/mergemaster (18:30PM EST May 10. 2002), and that changes nothing. /usr/src/etc/*/* does

Re: make.conf and -CURRENT

2002-05-10 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:40:11PM -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 06:37:11PM -0400, Jeff Ito wrote: Hello, Is the lack of /etc/defaults/make.conf intentional? an oversite? or perhaps something that I have messed up on my end? I have run cvsup/mergemaster

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-05-10 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

pam su

2002-05-10 Thread Galen Sampson
Hello all, After a 'make buildworld -DNO_WERROR` with sources today (05/10/02) and a mergemaster I am seeing the following on the console when I su: May 10 22:14:38 su: using dynamic pam_nologin.so May 10 22:14:38 su: adding pam_nologin.so to cache May 10 22:14:38 su: pam_lastlog.so: