I replaced my old 486/66 with a P1/133 and some new devices... FreeBSD
has a problem with my CD_ROM (alone as master on secondary ata), but it
was working quite fine and fast under NT (which the previous owner had
installed and i tested the system on).
Jun 25 08:15:13 DSLRouter /kernel: acd0:
Hi,
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
Thanks
Regards
Sid
--
I've known him as a man, as an adolescent and as a
Hi folks,
Could someone put me out of my misery and show me the right way to
build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
where that g++31 comes from the lang/gcc31 port, and either way,
XFree86-4-clients fails with:
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile
with gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just
for that.
I hacked together a really crude patch based on some info from Joe
Clark(e?). Dig
On 2002-06-25 12:44 +, Sid Carter wrote:
Hi,
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
Thanks
Regards
Sid
Not
Title: RE: GCC upgrade ? on -current
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile
with gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just
for that.
Only David's(?) time constraints I think.
/usr/sbin/sysinstall* - fix - *
sys/*/conf/gethints.pl * - del?/fix? - *
/usr/bin/afmtodit Kyle Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - redo - *
/usr/bin/mmroff Lester A Mesa [EMAIL PROTECTED] - redo - *
/usr/bin/whereissheldonh - redo - *
/usr/sbin/adduser Mike Makonnen
Hello,
I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
/usr/include/g++ and the old one (which has lots of older files due to
Ollivier Robert wrote:
Hello,
I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
/usr/include/g++ and the old one (which
According to Michael Nottebrock:
You need a clean /usr/include. Remove the old one and 'make includes' in
Good, that I had.
/usr/src. Please make also sure your ports-tree is up to date. I think
you're using an old bsd.kde.mk.
That was it, thanks.
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The
o Please shorten any long line or comment to less than 80 columns
This is quite tricky when using 8 character tabs. Is 4 character indent
okay for userland source?
Real tabs are best. Look at style(9) for ways to break the long
lines.
It is ok to break very long
lines
On (2002/06/25 10:20), Mark Murray wrote:
How's this?
int handle;
template = /tmp/mumble;
char *cmd;
handle = mkstemp(template); // template is modified
asprintf(cmd, prog %s, template);
system(cmd);
close(handle); // bye-bye file
It would be failsafe if you tested that
Ãкº¡Ò÷ӧҹ¢Í§¸ØáԨã¹Í¹Ò¤µ·Óä´é§èÒÂ
áÅÐÊÃéÒ§ÃÒÂä´é§ÒÁ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹ¼èÒ¹Ãкº¼ÁÁÕÃÒÂä´éÁÒ¡¡ÇèÒ
30,000 / à´×͹ ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹà¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3
ªÑèÇâÁ§à·èÒ¹Ñé¹âÍ¡ÒÊÁÒ¶Ö§¤Ø³áÅéÇ
* Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020625 02:26] wrote:
I couldn't see a simple way around this, any clues?
How's this?
int handle;
template = /tmp/mumble;
char *cmd;
handle = mkstemp(template); // template is modified
asprintf(cmd, prog %s, template);
system(cmd);
Ãкº¡Ò÷ӧҹ¢Í§¸ØáԨã¹Í¹Ò¤µ·Óä´é§èÒÂ
áÅÐÊÃéÒ§ÃÒÂä´é§ÒÁ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹ¼èÒ¹Ãкº¼ÁÁÕÃÒÂä´éÁÒ¡¡ÇèÒ
30,000 / à´×͹ ¨Ò¡¡Ò÷ӧҹà¾Õ§ÇѹÅÐ 2-3
ªÑèÇâÁ§à·èÒ¹Ñé¹âÍ¡ÒÊÁÒ¶Ö§¤Ø³áÅéÇ
Kinda buggy. :)
Ya, ya, ya. :-)
That was the concept model. The actual author can make it robust. :-)
M
--
o Mark Murray
\_
O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
mark /usr/sbin/sysinstall * - fix - *
What should we do about sysinstall and perl5 package? Options for the
solution may include:
1) Install perl5 package also if 'base' distribution is selected.
pros: Nobody forget to install perl5 package. /usr/bin/perl
should
According to Makoto Matsushita:
3) New entry 'perl5' is added to the distributions list, just like
base, compat4x, crypto, XFree86, etc. Install perl5 package if
perl5 package is selected.
3a) new entry perl5 added but selected by default to match what's in
STABLE.
POLA is respected
An Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 09:13:44AM -0700, Edwin Culp schreib :
Quoting Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| FreeBSD calvin 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #0: Mon Jun 10 13:55:43 IST
| 2002 root@calvin:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Hi guys,
Another reboot. This seems to happen when I
Hi,
This is so cool ;)
I just got rebooted again, :D
The messages show this.
---
Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
sleep with process lock locked from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:321
Jun 25 18:21:19 calvin
I just copied the relevant example from IBM developerWorks site. I guess
they have a thing or two to learn on the topic they were trying to teach
:)
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 15:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
John Polstra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your patch isn't quite right. It's true that matching
Hi,
with a -current CVSupped 17 May 22:27 GMT-2:
hunter[4]$ gdb -k kernel.debug vmcore.23
GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD)
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under
The last commit to sys/sys/stat.h made by Kirk broke compilation of
_POSIX_SOURCE programs. It uses sizeof(struct timespec) to pad the
st_createtimespec field to 16 bytes, but struct timespec is not visible
when _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On my -current laptop, and my other -current and -stable machines, TCP
seems to work a lot better if I disable net.inet.tcp.newreno.
Has anybody else seen similar behaviour ?
Who owns this problem ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP
--- Sean Chittenden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ran into, what I think is the same thing as you're
describing, a
while ago. The short and skinny being that -O0
doesn't compile any
ASM which breaks things and is why you need at least
-O to compile the
kernel/world. ::shrug:: I could've
Well I get a build error here, my current is one day old and the
perlport is installed.
/John
xfree86-4
Description: application/java-applet
I'm getting the following on upgrade:
rm -f translate.o
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=../../../../exports/lib cc -c -O -pipe-ansi -pedantic
-Dasm=__asm -Wall -Wpointer-arith
-I../../../../exports/include -I../../../../exports/include/X11
-I../../../../include/extensions
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:12:25PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
2) Use additional menu for install perl5 package or not, if 'base'
distribution is selected. Install perl5 package if user selects
yes to the menu.
pros: Choices is available. Maybe nobody forget to install
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Could someone put me out of my misery and show me the right way to
build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
where that g++31 comes from the lang/gcc31
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
The last commit to sys/sys/stat.h made by Kirk broke compilation of
_POSIX_SOURCE programs. It uses sizeof(struct timespec) to pad the
st_createtimespec field to 16 bytes, but struct timespec is not visible
when _POSIX_SOURCE is defined.
Oops.
On (2002/06/25 10:06), David O'Brien wrote:
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Could someone put me out of my misery and show me the right way to
build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 07:33:27PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Was that advice based on the fact that you've built XFree86-4
successfully with lang/gcc31, or was it an educated guess?
Just a guess. I wonder if C++ code is being compiled with `gcc' rather
than `g++'.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Sid Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is so cool ;)
I just got rebooted again, :D
The messages show this.
---
Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
sleep with process lock locked from
I made the following patch to get C++ exceptions working with
system GCC 3.1. STLPort and all other previously failing
test cases appear to be working fine.
Please test this patch and let me know if it breaks anything.
--
Alexander Kabaev
Index: config/i386/freebsd.h
On 24-Jun-2002 (11:36:34/GMT) Makoto Matsushita wrote:
The only (I think) user configurable file under /usr/src tree is
the custom kernel file, pointed by KERNCONF in /etc/make.conf.
cd /usr/src; make {build,install}kernel with
KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_CFG
Chris Hansen- Original Message -From: "friends" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: < [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Tue,25 Jun 2002 20:42:39 PMSubject: !!This e-mail is never sent unsolicited. If you need to unsubscribe, follow the instructions at the bottom of the
Visite nuestra pgina Web en http://www.shell.com.ar
Este mensaje es confidencial. Puede contener informacin amparada por el secreto comercial. Si usted ha recibido este e-mail por error, por favor tenga la amabilidad de
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 08:14:30PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
# diff -u2 /usr/src/Makefile.inc1.orig /usr/src/Makefile.inc1
--- /usr/src/Makefile.inc1.origMon Apr 29 20:42:50 2002
+++ /usr/src/Makefile.inc1 Tue Jun 25 20:05:28 2002
@@ -402,9 +402,10 @@
KRNLCONFDIR=
Sid Carter wrote:
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
On Intel, FreeBSD will automatically use 4M pages for mmap'ed
device
Is this not the latest one?
alpha:~: gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.1 [FreeBSD] 20020509 (prerelease)
Ken
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Sid Carter wrote:
Hi,
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
hello, world\n
for a few days now I'm trying to upgrade my -current from about Wed May
1 but keep running into the following. I've nuked /usr/src and /usr/obj
to remove the possibility of stale files. Could the reason be that my old
current still uses gcc version 2.95.4 20020320 [FreeBSD] or
Hello Sheldon,
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 09:21:57AM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
Hi folks,
Could someone put me out of my misery and show me the right way to
build XFree86-4 on -current at the moment.
I've tried `make install' and `make CXX=/usr/local/bin/g++31 install',
where that g++31
Munish Chopra wrote:
On 2002-06-25 12:44 +, Sid Carter wrote:
Just a query. Is there anything stopping us from moving to the
latest gcc on current ? Just curious. Cause mozilla won't compile with
gcc from current and I have installed gcc from the ports just for that.
Not exactly an
Ollivier Robert wrote:
I've upgraded my CURRENT system to a post gcc 3.1 world and I'm now unable
to compile any C++ program that use the STL (incl. KDE 3.0.1). I happens
with the system g++ 3.1 and the ports g++ 3.1.1 and with both a clean
/usr/include/g++ and the old one (which has lots of
Ollivier Robert wrote:
According to Michael Nottebrock:
You need a clean /usr/include. Remove the old one and 'make includes' in
Good, that I had.
/usr/src. Please make also sure your ports-tree is up to date. I think
you're using an old bsd.kde.mk.
That was it, thanks.
Looks like
Makoto Matsushita wrote:
mark /usr/sbin/sysinstall * - fix - *
What should we do about sysinstall and perl5 package? Options for the
solution may include:
[ ... ]
5) (add your option here)
Make perl just another package.
Bonus points: In the upgrade case, install it if perl is
Shizuka Kudo wrote:
Thanks for your answer. I'm just curious why a lower
optimization level could cause trouble than -O.
Anyway, my -current works fine with the default
CFLAGS. It seems that there're some commits to
rtld-elf on today.
THe compiler is broken.
If you are that intent on
Brian F. Feldman wrote:
---
Jun 25 18:06:30 calvin kernel: /usr/src/sys/vm/uma_core.c:1331: could
sleep with process lock locked from /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_exec.c:321
Jun 25 18:21:19 calvin syslogd: kernel boot file is /boot/kernel/kernel
Jun
48 matches
Mail list logo
