> Yes. But our 5.0-RELEASE is will non-polished; so I think having the
> compiler in the same shape is OK if it means we can get bugs fixed and
> our needs taken care of.
But it's still a relase. :-)
> Many IA-64, and AMD x86-64 bug fixes and improvements aren't merged back
> to the 3.{1,2} bran
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Andrey A. Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I doubt about choosed EPERM code. According to intro(2) it refers to some
> priviledges required for operation, but recursive call is not restricted
> due to priviledges. What about of other code, like EFAULT?
Not
Bruce Evans wrote:
> No, but the 3Com driver apparently is. The sio driver wants to have
> fast interrupts. It can't have them with the irq is shared, so its
> worst-case interrupt latency for a single serial port is increased
> from about 50 usec to many msec, depending other interrupt activity
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
gcc in -current is a prerelease -- dated just a few days before gcc 3.1 was
released. Will it be upgraded to 3.1 proper (or maybe 3.2) before 5.0's
officially out?
Faried.
- --
The Great GNU has arrived, infidels, behold his wrath !
If I
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
>I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a signal
>in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals.
Considering that opening a disk-device cannot be guaranteed to
succeed in finite time (think SAN, SCSI over IP
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Leiding
> er writes:
> >Have a look at Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >(should be in the archive of audit).
>
> Ah, I had forgotten about that -audit thread.
>
> >Short: open shouldn't be able to return EINTR in
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 03:59:42PM +0200, Morten Rodal wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Eirik Nygaard wrote:
> > I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be
> > great if you could take a look at it and check if everything is ok.
>
> You should probably repla
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexander Leiding
er writes:
>Have a look at Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>(should be in the archive of audit).
Ah, I had forgotten about that -audit thread.
>Short: open shouldn't be able to return EINTR in practice...
>
>My assumptions:
> - Bruce hasn't made
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 02:02:39PM +0200, Eirik Nygaard wrote:
> I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be
> great if you could take a look at it and check if everything is ok.
You should probably replace the strcpy() and strcat() with strlcpy(3) and
strlcat(3), or at least
Hi,
For a few months now I have been seeing the following problems with the
ftpd in current. When transferring a large file, ftpd seems to
consistantly fail after almost all of the file hass been transferred. The
example transcript below shows all but 4096 bytes of a file being
transferred befor
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002 00:07:28 +0100 Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was just looking at PR bin/18319 when I remembered this message.
> Many of the changes in your patch are not necessary I believe, as
> read(2) will restart after a signal by default. How about just
> fixing the open call
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00D0_85E10D4E.D7384B52"
I have just rewritten the rmuser perl script to C, it would be great if you could take
a look at it and check if everything is ok.
How do I get this commited?
--
Eirik Nygaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP Key: 83C55EDE
/*
** -*- perl -*-
** Copyright 1995, 1996, 1997 Guy Helmer, Ames, Iowa 5001
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> OS: FreeBSD-current DP1 (dmesg attached)
> Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked)
> Hardware: 3Com Bluetooth USB dongle, 3Com Bluetooth PC-CARD
> Xircom CBT PC-CARD (with 16550A UART)
>
> First of all, irq 11 gets shared between PC-CARD control
Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on Saturday, August 10, 2002 at 00:27:43
---
gjbzsoz:
Hi, just got done putting up the cams, so come and take a look
htt
17 matches
Mail list logo