On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:55:27AM -0400, Yuri Victorovich wrote:
Is it a bug that function sock_host is declared
sock_host() in /usr/include/tcpd.h
but defined as sock_host(struct request_info *)
in /usr/src/contrib/tcp_wrappers/socket.c ?
A fucntion which is declared with no arguments (eg
This seems like a new one (previous kernels kept crashing with most
recently used by none).
FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Fri Aug 16 12:47:10 PDT
2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZIPPY_SMP_WITNESS i386
GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627
Hi,
Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ?
Martin
Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
ImproWare AG, UNIXSP ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH
Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01
PGP:
David,
A fucntion which is declared with no arguments (eg sock_host())
is assumed to be a function defined in the KR way. Argument number
and types don't need to be known. To decalre a function which takes
no arguments (and which has an ANSI style definition) you say
function(void). So
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 03:27:31PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ?
Martin
I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer
quickly (it has been addressed several times).
--
Morten Rodal
//
// PGP ID 2D75595B
//
Hi,
I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer
quickly (it has been addressed several times).
Thanks, yes found it. But with the answers I'm very unpleased. I really
really hope that we import either 3.2 or 3.3 now. Personally I'd
go with 3.2.
The fact is that
Symptom:
=== sbin/ifconfig
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -I..-c
/usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c
cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
mb The situation is very unpleasant.
IIRC, we have no active GCC maintainer, no matter you feel unpleasant or not...
-- -
Makoto `MAR' Matsushita
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
Such KR way to declare functions sounds like an open invitation for
bugs.
Agreed.
I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we
get more useful warnings from it.
I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that
I've been meaning to contribute back to the
I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we
get more useful warnings from it.
I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that
I've been meaning to contribute back to the author. Wanna play? :-)
Sure! Would appreciate if you send it to me )
Regards,
I get the following error when trying to compile gcc 3.3 (or 3.2) from
ports on my CURRENT machine :
/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/gcj
-B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/libjava/
-B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/ -ffloat-store -g -O2 -o
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
lock order reversal
1st 0xc25bb160 process lock (process lock) @
../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360
2nd 0xc03eee00 filelist lock (filelist lock) @
../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:1113
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running.
Anyone else getting this?
I'm amazed
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT)
From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote:
If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end
up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and
the panic always happens in
I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and
dual P55C).
I am running SMP CURRENT kernel on 4-Alpha processors . No problems
for a lot of months.
Yuri.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Wolfskill said:
From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all.
I'm not.
both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C
and dual P55C).
freebeast(5.0-C)[2] uname -a
CPU:
--On dimanche 18 août 2002 21:56 -0700 Dag-Erling Smorgrav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
19 matches
Mail list logo