Re: libwrap bug?

2002-08-18 Thread David Malone
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 12:55:27AM -0400, Yuri Victorovich wrote: Is it a bug that function sock_host is declared sock_host() in /usr/include/tcpd.h but defined as sock_host(struct request_info *) in /usr/src/contrib/tcp_wrappers/socket.c ? A fucntion which is declared with no arguments (eg

panic: Most recently used by BIO buffer

2002-08-18 Thread Alex Zepeda
This seems like a new one (previous kernels kept crashing with most recently used by none). FreeBSD blarf.homeip.net 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #6: Fri Aug 16 12:47:10 PDT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/ZIPPY_SMP_WITNESS i386 GNU gdb 5.2.0 (FreeBSD) 20020627

GCC 3.2

2002-08-18 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ? Martin Martin Blapp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ImproWare AG, UNIXSP ISP, Zurlindenstrasse 29, 4133 Pratteln, CH Phone: +41 061 826 93 00: +41 61 826 93 01 PGP:

Re: libwrap bug?

2002-08-18 Thread Yuri Victorovich
David, A fucntion which is declared with no arguments (eg sock_host()) is assumed to be a function defined in the KR way. Argument number and types don't need to be known. To decalre a function which takes no arguments (and which has an ANSI style definition) you say function(void). So

Re: GCC 3.2

2002-08-18 Thread Morten Rodal
On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 03:27:31PM +0200, Martin Blapp wrote: Hi, Any plans or ideas when gcc3.2 will be imported ? Martin I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer quickly (it has been addressed several times). -- Morten Rodal // // PGP ID 2D75595B //

Re: GCC 3.2

2002-08-18 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I think if you search the mailinglist archive you will find your answer quickly (it has been addressed several times). Thanks, yes found it. But with the answers I'm very unpleased. I really really hope that we import either 3.2 or 3.3 now. Personally I'd go with 3.2. The fact is that

World breakage + (possible) patch [compiles; still building world]

2002-08-18 Thread David Wolfskill
Symptom: === sbin/ifconfig cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wnested-externs -I..-c /usr/src/sbin/ifconfig/ifconfig.c cc -O -pipe -DUSE_IF_MEDIA -DINET6 -DUSE_VLANS -DUSE_IEEE80211 -DNS -Wall

i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: GCC 3.2

2002-08-18 Thread Makoto Matsushita
mb The situation is very unpleasant. IIRC, we have no active GCC maintainer, no matter you feel unpleasant or not... -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: libwrap bug?

2002-08-18 Thread Mark Murray
Such KR way to declare functions sounds like an open invitation for bugs. Agreed. I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we get more useful warnings from it. I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that I've been meaning to contribute back to the

Re: libwrap bug?

2002-08-18 Thread Yuri Victorovich
I've been considering adding ANSI prototypes to tcpd.h, so we get more useful warnings from it. I have a local ISOfication (and lint cleanup) of tcp_wrappers that I've been meaning to contribute back to the author. Wanna play? :-) Sure! Would appreciate if you send it to me ) Regards,

Weird error when trying to link rmic from gcc 3.3

2002-08-18 Thread Ollivier Robert
I get the following error when trying to compile gcc 3.3 (or 3.2) from ports on my CURRENT machine : /local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/gcj -B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/i386-portbld-freebsd5.0/libjava/ -B/local/src/ports/lang/gcc33/work/build/gcc/ -ffloat-store -g -O2 -o

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-08-18 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

lock order reversal / could sleep with process lock:

2002-08-18 Thread Alex Zepeda
../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with process lock locked from ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360 lock order reversal 1st 0xc25bb160 process lock (process lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_exec.c:360 2nd 0xc03eee00 filelist lock (filelist lock) @ ../../../kern/kern_descrip.c:1113

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Matthew N. Dodd
On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in swapout_procs while vmdaemon is running. Anyone else getting this? I'm amazed

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 20:44:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 17 Aug 2002, Mark Murray wrote: If I do a make -jN world build on my dual MMX/200 box, I usually end up in tears (well, a panic anyway). This is completely reproducible, and the panic always happens in

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Yuri Victorovich
I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all. both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and dual P55C). I am running SMP CURRENT kernel on 4-Alpha processors . No problems for a lot of months. Yuri. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: VM panic

2002-08-18 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Aug 18), David Wolfskill said: From: Matthew N. Dodd [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm amazed you've got a dual Pentium running -CURRENT at all. I'm not. both of mine haven't worked with SMP kernels for months. (dual P54C and dual P55C). freebeast(5.0-C)[2] uname -a CPU:

Re: i386 tinderbox failure

2002-08-18 Thread Mathieu Arnold
--On dimanche 18 août 2002 21:56 -0700 Dag-Erling Smorgrav [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools