5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
I built a make release overnight and I managed to install from it by copying the boot.flp image to a ZIP disk, selecting Minimum and FTP passive. So far so good. But we all know that sysintall has a few more bells and whistles than that, so NOW is the TIME of all good men to come to the aid of

make release run output

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
i386 release succeeded sparc64 release succeeded pc98 release failed : /usr/src/sys/pc98/i386/machdep.c:2371: structure has no member named `dr0' : ... alpha release failed : sh -e /usr/src/release/scripts/doFS.sh /R/stage/floppies/kern.flp /R/stage /mnt :1440 /R/stage/image.kern 8 fd1440

Re: make release run output

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Thankyou! This is most valuable at this time! Do we have some volunteers chasing the pc98 and alpha issues ? Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruslan Ermilov writes: --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding:

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: I want as many people as possible to beat up on sysinstall as much as they can. And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away. Please try to be creative in the choices you make in sysinstall, we don't need 20 people all testing ftp-passive, we need to

Re: make release run output

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:41:38AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Thankyou! This is most valuable at this time! Do we have some volunteers chasing the pc98 and alpha issues ? I thought you'd fix pc98. These were your changes, weren't they? :-) In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruslan

Re: make release run output

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ruslan Ermilov writes: --gr/z0/N6AeWAPJVB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:41:38AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: =20 Thankyou! =20 This is most valuable

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-21 ] [ Subjecte: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! ] I want as many people as possible to beat up on sysinstall as much as they can. I've been fighting to find a way to install -CURRENT pure on my workstation using

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Juli Mallett wrote: Anyone with a good idea on how to bootstrap a _clean_ 5.0 install to a box with only a CDROM drive, and 4.7 CD, with broken PXE firmware, and an IDE disk which can be thrashed, by all means tell me... I'd imagine that I could just use the mfsroot and kernel, but there's no

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-22 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! ] Juli Mallett wrote: Anyone with a good idea on how to bootstrap a _clean_ 5.0 install to a box with only a CDROM drive, and 4.7 CD, with broken PXE firmware, and

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Soeren Schmidt
It seems Juli Mallett wrote: Find another box where it has already been successfully installed, and an ISO image has been built from sources. I don't have a CD burner. I have no ability to burn a CD at all. Where do you live ? I'm sure we can find someone with a CD burner near you willing

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Soeren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-22 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! ] It seems Juli Mallett wrote: Find another box where it has already been successfully installed, and an ISO image has been built from sources. I don't have a

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Juli Mallett wrote: Find another box where it has already been successfully installed, and an ISO image has been built from sources. I don't have a CD burner. I have no ability to burn a CD at all. You don't burn a CD from the other box, you install from it. Though FreeBSD doesn't

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-22 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! ] Juli Mallett wrote: Find another box where it has already been successfully installed, and an ISO image has been built from sources. I don't have a CD burner.

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:54:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: World is broken if you try and build with -fno-builtin: c++ -O -pipe -ggdb -fno-builtin -march=pentium3 -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf/../../../contrib/gperf/lib -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf -o gperf bool-array.o gen-perf.o

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Juli Mallett wrote: If I wanted to do this, I could, but it would not give me a clean 5.0 install, and it is also not that simple at this time, as (afaict) kern.disks is required by sysinstall, which 4.x doesn't support... And even then, I'd have to blow away everything except /tmp first,

Re: kernel panic when booting with USB CF reader

2002-10-22 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:10:25AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Lars Eggert writes: umass0: SanDisk Corporation ImageMate CompactFlash USB, rev 1.10/0.09, addr 5 umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) da2 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da2:

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Ceri Davies
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: If you don't have the machine-power to run make release yourself, I hope the japanese snapshot server is producing good snapshots, if that fails, I would appreciate if somebody will produce and put up good releases and/or ISO

ld: unrecognised emulation mode: elf_i386

2002-10-22 Thread Simon Dick
On my recent -current system I'm getting strange problems when trying to compile some source, eg comms/birda: === Building for birda-1.00 === lib Warning: Object directory not changed from original /usr/ports/comms/birda/work/birda-1.00/lib cc -O -pipe -march=pentium3 -march=pentium3

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote: Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to build -CURRENT? Yes, it is. It should even be possible to build -CURRENT with as early as 4.0-RELEASE. If it doesn't, please drop me a line. Cheers,

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:10:01PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan, Can you help with this, please? I think you're the best candidate since you know so much about the build system and you are the groff maintainer. I've found that if I just cd to /usr/src/share/doc and do a

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-22 Thread Seigo Tanimura
Introduction: The I/O buffer of the kernel are currently allocated in buffer_map sized statically upon boot, and never grows. This limits the scale of I/O performance on a host with large physical memory. We used to tune NBUF to cope with that problem. This workaround, however, results in a

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Seigo Tanimur a writes: The patch at: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/dynamicbuf.diff.gz Comments and flames are welcome. Thanks a lot. This looks very very interesting! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
When i tries to copy a file from smbfs share mounted by mount_smbfs i get an error: cp: ./filename: Bad address But when i copy a file to share i get kernel panic like this: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor write,

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:01:35PM +0300, Vitaly Markitantov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When i tries to copy a file from smbfs share mounted by mount_smbfs i get an error: cp: ./filename: Bad address But when i copy a file to share i get kernel panic like this: Fatal trap 12: page fault

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Maxime Henrion
Vitaly Markitantov wrote: When i tries to copy a file from smbfs share mounted by mount_smbfs i get an error: cp: ./filename: Bad address But when i copy a file to share i get kernel panic like this: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address= 0x0

current vs stable performance compare?

2002-10-22 Thread Vitaly Markitantov
Where i can found performance comparison of -CURRENT over -STABLE systems? -- Vitaly Markitantov mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 117438950 phone: (062)332-23-90 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

RE: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Oct-2002 Vitaly Markitantov wrote: When i tries to copy a file from smbfs share mounted by mount_smbfs i get an error: cp: ./filename: Bad address But when i copy a file to share i get kernel panic like this: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address

Re: current vs stable performance compare?

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Vitaly Markitantov writes: Where i can found performance comparison of -CURRENT over -STABLE systems? Very little has been done yet, -CURRENT is not expected to perform particularly well until more of the kernel is out from under the Giant lock. -- Poul-Henning

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Kyle R . Green
Hello. I downloaded the floppies for 5.0-20021021-SNAP from ftp2.freebsd.org. When I perform the install it complains a few times about not being able to create /tmp, due to a read-only filesystem, and, later in the install, cannot write /etc/resolv.conf, stopping the install dead in its

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kyle R.Green wr ites: Hello. I downloaded the floppies for 5.0-20021021-SNAP from ftp2.freebsd.org. When I perform the install it complains a few times about not being able to create /tmp, due to a read-only filesystem, and, later in the install, cannot write

groff -ms breakage

2002-10-22 Thread Tim Robbins
It seems groff is failing to format most of the roff documentation in src/share/doc, for example psd/15.yacc. Here is the output that groff -Tascii -ms produces on -current: ss..:44: warning: number register `0:LL' not defined ss..:44: warning: number register `0:ri' not defined ss..:44: warning:

Expensive timeout(9) function @an_stats_update() [/usr/src/sys/dev/an/if_an.c:724]

2002-10-22 Thread David Wolfskill
Noticed a bunch of: Expensive timeout(9) function: 0xc0170e40(0xc274c000) 0.001114387 from running (yesterday's) -CURRENT, so I thought I'd check against (yesterday's kernel.debug (before I replaced it with today's). Per nm -lan kernel.debug, I see: c0170420 T an_attach

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:10:01PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan, Can you help with this, please? I think you're the best candidate since you know so much about the build system and you are the groff maintainer. I've found that if I just cd to /usr/src/share/doc and do a

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:23:20AM -0700, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] It would help a lot if you could provide a traceback. This is the one I'm seeing everytime while trying to copy file from ro smbfs mount. -current is about four days old, smbfs.ko _is_ compiled with -DSMP

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: If you remove -fno-exceptions from gnu/usr.bin/groff/Makefile.inc and recompile libgroff and groff, it seems to work (I did not check it thoroughly). But I think this only has a side effect, because Groff does not seem to have any exception code (please correct me

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Oct-2002 Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:23:20AM -0700, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] It would help a lot if you could provide a traceback. This is the one I'm seeing everytime while trying to copy file from ro smbfs mount. -current is about four

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/10/22 10:48), John Baldwin wrote: This is the one I'm seeing everytime while trying to copy file from ro smbfs mount. -current is about four days old, smbfs.ko _is_ compiled with -DSMP and in sync with kernel. Can you compile smbfs into your kernel 'options SMBFS' instead of as

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:45:52AM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan Ermilov writes: If you remove -fno-exceptions from gnu/usr.bin/groff/Makefile.inc and recompile libgroff and groff, it seems to work (I did not check it thoroughly). But I think this only has a side effect,

New-busified rc(4) - testers needed

2002-10-22 Thread John Baldwin
At the request of another developer who has since been swamped and unable to actually test it, I converted the rc(4) driver over to new-bus. If anyone can test it I would appreciate it. Download the tarball http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/rc.tgz and unpack it into a -current kernel source

Re: groff -ms breakage

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:59:54PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote: It seems groff is failing to format most of the roff documentation in src/share/doc, for example psd/15.yacc. Here is the output that groff -Tascii -ms produces on -current: ss..:44: warning: number register `0:LL' not defined

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:29:29PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 02:10:01PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: Ruslan, Can you help with this, please? I think you're the best candidate since you know so much about the build system and you are the groff

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: Well, I tried this on beast. It is easily reproduceable. It turned out that if you build groff with -DNO_CPU_CFLAGS (the way it is built during the bootstrap-tools stage of buildworld), it fails with the `out of memory' error in

Build breakage

2002-10-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
From a tree that I updated last night, building on a 4.7-stable system: as -o boot2.o boot2.s as --defsym SIOPRT=0x3f8 --defsym SIOFMT=0x3 --defsym SIOSPD=9600 /home/imp/FreeBSD/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/sio.s -o sio.o ld -nostdlib -static -N -Ttext 0x2000 -o boot2.out

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
Anyone cares to post a ktrace? -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:39:43 -0400 Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone cares to post a ktrace? -- Alexander Kabaev If this is a case of a brk(2) failing, then I have a patch in testing to fix that. Give me some time to finish. -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: Groff problems (was Re: alpha tinderbox failure)

2002-10-22 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Alexander Kabaev writes: On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:39:43 -0400 Alexander Kabaev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone cares to post a ktrace? -- Alexander Kabaev If this is a case of a brk(2) failing, then I have a patch in testing to fix that. Give me some time to finish.

Re: kernel panic when booting with USB CF reader

2002-10-22 Thread Lars Eggert
Bernd Walter wrote: It's just the Name that don't exist. Some time ago I was told to just open the device even if there is no node listable in /dev. E.g. mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt Yes, this works (Terry also pointed this out.) I wish this could be wired to the media change signal somehow.

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread marius
Last week I replace a broken mainboard with a dual-Athlon one (Tyan Tiger s2466n-4m) and decided to upgrade that box from 4-stable to -current by installing the 0917-jpsnap via the floppies and passive ftp. I hit several sysinstall-problems some of which my already be fixed: - The hd I install

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:48:58AM -0400, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you compile smbfs into your kernel 'options SMBFS' instead of as a module and then get a dump and provide a trace? #13 0xc0383f58 in calltrap () at {standard input}:99 #14 0xc455a66e in ?? () #15 0xc455a072

building -CURRENT on RELENG_4

2002-10-22 Thread Max Khon
hi, there! cross-building -CURRENT on RELENG_4 is broken in src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1: --- cut here --- ... sh /usr/fbsd/HEAD/src/usr.bin/xlint/lint1/makeman /usr/libexec/lint1 -m lint.7 lint1: illegal option -- m usage: lint1 [-abcdeghprstuvyzF] src dest gzip -cn lint.7 lint.7.gz --- cut here

emacs?

2002-10-22 Thread walt
I'm confused about the -CURRENT emacs breakage. Is this an O.S. breakage which will eventually be fixed, or a permanent change which will require a patch to emacs? Thanks. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:22:41AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:54:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: World is broken if you try and build with -fno-builtin: c++ -O -pipe -ggdb -fno-builtin -march=pentium3

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Oct-2002 Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:48:58AM -0400, John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can you compile smbfs into your kernel 'options SMBFS' instead of as a module and then get a dump and provide a trace? #13 0xc0383f58 in calltrap () at {standard input}:99

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Mathieu Arnold
--On mardi 22 octobre 2002 10:08 +0100 Ceri Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: If you don't have the machine-power to run make release yourself, I hope the japanese snapshot server is producing good snapshots, if that fails,

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Vallo Kallaste wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:23:20AM -0700, Maxime Henrion [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] It would help a lot if you could provide a traceback. This is the one I'm seeing everytime while trying to copy file from ro smbfs mount. -current is about four days old,

Re: Dynamic growth of the buffer and buffer page reclaim

2002-10-22 Thread Julian Elischer
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Seigo Tanimura wrote: Introduction: [...] The patch at: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tanimura/patches/dynamicbuf.diff.gz Cool.. -jbaselinew/ my patch realusersys realusersys 1 1608.21 1387.94 125.96 1577.88

Re: emacs?

2002-10-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:29 -0700 walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm confused about the -CURRENT emacs breakage. Is this an O.S. breakage which will eventually be fixed, or a permanent change which will require a patch to emacs? Thanks. This is a permanent change. The new binutils

dmesg warnings, related to acpi?

2002-10-22 Thread Peter Schultz
I have two \\_SB_.PCI0 related warnings being output at boot. The one about AE_BAD_DATA is fairly recent, but I don't know what kernel it appeared with. I moved recently and haven't have a smooth upgrade path. The FDC0 - AE_AML_UNINITIALIZED_LOCAL warning has been around for some time.

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Kris Kennaway wrote: /usr/src/contrib/gperf/src/bool-array.icc:81: warning: rand() does not produce high-quality random numbers and should not generally be used /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libstdc++.so: undefined reference to `fabsl' *** Error code 1 This is because we lack the

Building KDE3

2002-10-22 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I recently (late last week) upgraded my machine from -stable to -current. I immediately had an issue with __sF errors from various libraries and saw that it was fixed as of this past weekend, so I cvsuped and made world yesterday morning, too. Knowing that c++ apps would start to break till they

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:15:09PM -0700, Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #14 0xc455a66e in ?? () #15 0xc455a072 in ?? () #16 0xc4559e87 in ?? () #17 0xc45609f8 in ?? () If you are running the smbfs.ko, either load the module symbols into gdb before asking for the traceback, or

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread The Anarcat
On Tue Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [...] And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away. [...] 9 days??? There won't be another DP? A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, The Anarcat wrote: On Tue Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: [...] And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away. [...] 9 days??? There won't be another DP? Um, not exactly. The current release date isn't until 20 November

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:40:38PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: /usr/src/contrib/gperf/src/bool-array.icc:81: warning: rand() does not produce high-quality random numbers and should not generally be used /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libstdc++.so: undefined reference

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:07:50PM -0700, Bruce A. Mah wrote: If memory serves me right, The Anarcat wrote: On Tue Oct 22, 2002 at 08:33:53AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: And I want them to do it RSN: 5.0-R is only 9 days away. 9 days??? There won't be another DP? Um, not

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:40:38PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Is it? Yes, because as it stands this function is supplied by gcc as a built-in function, and the source tree will not compile without it (e.g. with a non-gcc compiler). Alternately, the use could avoid adding the -fno-builtin,

Re: smbfs broken?

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Vallo Kallaste wrote: It would be nice if you could give us more information as to exactly what it is you are doing, logically, to cause this problem; as things sit, it seems you are doing some evil things. No, I'm doing exactly what I describe. Usual boot to multiuser, then kill all of

Re: emacs?

2002-10-22 Thread walt
Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:29 -0700 walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm confused about the -CURRENT emacs breakage... ...The code in [x]emacs is not prepared to deal with the change in format and thus will have to be fixed, or the while issue could be worked around by

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Steve Kargl wrote: I've noticed many commits on cvs-all include an Approved by: re line, but I haven't seen an official code slush/freeze announcement. Feature freeze started 16 October. New feature commits (as opposed to bugfix or doc commits) should have RE

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Stefan Farfeleder wrote: [ ... fabsl() ... ] What standard defines this thing, which g++ has as a built-in? Alternately, the use could avoid adding the -fno-builtin, and the problem would go away. ISO C99 7.12.7.2 The fabs functions Synopsis #include math.h double

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread marius
Is sysinstall still supposed to copy the contents of the mfsroot- image to /stand ? This at least results in two copies of sysinstall, one in /stand and the other one in /usr/sbin. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] .de writes: Is sysinstall still supposed to copy the contents of the mfsroot- image to /stand ? This at least results in two copies of sysinstall, one in /stand and the other one in /usr/sbin. That is intentional -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Steve Kargl
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 01:28:56PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote: Stefan Farfeleder wrote: [ ... fabsl() ... ] What standard defines this thing, which g++ has as a built-in? Alternately, the use could avoid adding the -fno-builtin, and the problem would go away. ISO C99

Re: emacs?

2002-10-22 Thread John Baldwin
On 22-Oct-2002 walt wrote: Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:29 -0700 walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm confused about the -CURRENT emacs breakage... ...The code in [x]emacs is not prepared to deal with the change in format and thus will have to be fixed, or the while

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread marius
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:39:32PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: That is intentional Is it ok then that the sysinstall in /stand of the 0917-JPSNAP immediately dumps core with signal 10 when run on a 1017 -current ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] .de writes: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:39:32PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: That is intentional Is it ok then that the sysinstall in /stand of the 0917-JPSNAP immediately dumps core with signal 10 when run on a 1017 -current ? Current

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] .de writes: Is sysinstall still supposed to copy the contents of the mfsroot- image to /stand ? This at least results in two copies of sysinstall, one in /stand and the other one in /usr/sbin. That is intentional

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Alexander Kabaev
libstdc++ is supposed to provide crude replacements for missing -l functions in its libmath/stubs.c file. Apparently, missing fabsl is an omission and should be fixed in FSF sources. -- Alexander Kabaev To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

alpha tinderbox failure

2002-10-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- stage 1: bootstrap tools -- stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread marius
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:40:12PM -0400, Brian F. Feldman wrote: For what it's worth; I'm also using a dual-Athlon that gets spontaneous reboots once in a while and seems like it could possibly have to do with ACPI activating while the system is trying to cool itself down. Do you have any

Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted!

2002-10-22 Thread Juli Mallett
* De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ Data: 2002-10-22 ] [ Subjecte: Re: 5.0-RUSH: -current install testers wanted! ] On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:39:32PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: That is intentional Is it ok then that the sysinstall in /stand of the 0917-JPSNAP immediately dumps

Re: pcic state

2002-10-22 Thread M. Warner Losh
pcic doesn't work with NEWCARD. I'm working on it.. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Mike Barcroft
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:22:41AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 07:54:01PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: World is broken if you try and build with -fno-builtin: c++ -O -pipe -ggdb -fno-builtin -march=pentium3

sbin/gbde compilation problem

2002-10-22 Thread Craig Rodrigues
Hi, I just did a cvsup and am trying to do a buildworld and am having a problem: === === sbin/gbde cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro

UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3)

2002-10-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:46:04PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I recently (late last week) upgraded my machine from -stable to -current. When you upgraded, you presumably didn't clear out stale headers from /usr/include. This needs to be added as a step in UPDATING because it will bite

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-22 Thread Gerhard Häring
* Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote: Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to build -CURRENT? Yes, it is. It should even be possible to build -CURRENT with as

Re: kernel panic when booting with USB CF reader

2002-10-22 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 10:23:06AM -0700, Lars Eggert wrote: Bernd Walter wrote: It's just the Name that don't exist. Some time ago I was told to just open the device even if there is no node listable in /dev. E.g. mount_msdosfs /dev/da2s1 /mnt Yes, this works (Terry also pointed this

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote: * Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote: Is it possible, or do I need to use a more recent installation to be able to build -CURRENT?

Re: UPDATING entry needed (Re: Building KDE3)

2002-10-22 Thread Nate Lawson
On Tue, 22 Oct 2002, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 03:46:04PM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote: I recently (late last week) upgraded my machine from -stable to -current. When you upgraded, you presumably didn't clear out stale headers from /usr/include. This needs to be

file system deadlock in -CURRENT

2002-10-22 Thread Daniel Rock
Hi, I found an interesting problem during tracing my perl-5.8 problem I mailed some days ago. Sometimes - I cannot forcibly reproduce this event - while I'm trying to truss a process, I first get the following error message: /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.0# truss ./perl truss: cannot

Re: file system deadlock in -CURRENT

2002-10-22 Thread Daniel Rock
Daniel Rock schrieb: Hi, I found an interesting problem during tracing my perl-5.8 problem I mailed some days ago. Sometimes - I cannot forcibly reproduce this event - while I'm trying to truss a process, I first get the following error message: /usr/ports/lang/perl5.8/work/perl-5.8.0#

Re: libstdc++ does not contain fabsl symbol

2002-10-22 Thread Terry Lambert
Mike Barcroft wrote: This is because we lack the long double fabsl(long double); in -lm and math.h. OK, thanks for tracking it down. This looks like an important omission that should be fixed for 5.0-R. No one has started work on any of the C99 math functions yet. I

Re: emacs?

2002-10-22 Thread walt
John Baldwin wrote: On 22-Oct-2002 walt wrote: Alexander Kabaev wrote: On Tue, 22 Oct 2002 11:08:29 -0700 walt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm confused about the -CURRENT emacs breakage... ...could be worked around by linking [x]emacs binary with -znocombreloc. Hmm. I tried make

DRM

2002-10-22 Thread Sean Kelly
I'm running a 5.0-CURRENT from earlier this morning and receive this notice: /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1000: could sleep with drm memory locked from @/dev/drm/drm_memory.h:217 I have 'device agp' in my kernel and I've got mga.ko loaded. The notice is raised when doing 'sysctl -a'. If I

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-22 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 01:48:14AM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote: * Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]: Are you running a current kernel at this point? If you aren't it's safe to say it won't work. No, this is 4.5-RELEASE, as I said. By current kernel, do you mean an

formatting bootable media

2002-10-22 Thread Lars Eggert
Hi, the following produces a bootable CF card under 4.7: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da2 bs=512 count=32 fdisk -BI da2 disklabel -w -B da2s1 auto disklabel -r da2s1 /tmp/da2s1 disklabel -r da2s1 | grep ' c:' | sed 's/c:/a:/' /tmp/da2s1 disklabel -R -B da2s1 /tmp/da2s1 newfs /dev/da2s1a

Re: Building -CURRENT with 4.5-RELEASE

2002-10-22 Thread Gerhard Häring
* Brooks Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 15:01 -0700]: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:11PM +0200, Gerhard Häring wrote: * Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-10-22 12:23 +0300]: On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:25:23AM +0200, Gerhard Haering wrote: Is it possible, or do I need to use a

Re: sbin/gbde compilation problem

2002-10-22 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 05:45:24PM -0400, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, I just did a cvsup and am trying to do a buildworld and am having a problem:

Re: formatting bootable media

2002-10-22 Thread Lars Eggert
Lars Eggert wrote: Hi, the following produces a bootable CF card under 4.7: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da2 bs=512 count=32 fdisk -BI da2 disklabel -w -B da2s1 auto disklabel -r da2s1 /tmp/da2s1 Turns out that the disklabel -r output after this step differs between -current and

  1   2   >