On Sat, 16 Nov 2002, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> > Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> > 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning
> > scheme. It also allows you to correc
Thus spake Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> So one thing we could start doing is have sysinstall's adduser stuff offer
> to place new users in the operator group, and set up the default
> permissions on removable devices such that the operator group has
> read/write access to them (or even just
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:59:25PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning
> scheme. It also allows you to correctly make smaller partitions beyond
> 1TB which is
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Martijn Pronk wrote:
> However, I had some starting problems with rpc.lockd.
> Aparently it requires that rpc.statd also is running.
Hmmm, it shouldn't fail if rpc.statd isn't enabled, but it should probably
complain loudly. Make sure you file a FreeBSD bug report on that, a
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get
> > suspend, resume, etc
Wesley Morgan wrote:
> Based on this, are you recommending that the DISABLE_* still be used? Will
> I never see the problem with 512mb of ram?
When Matt Dillon made some of the machdep.c allocation sizes
dependent on the physical RAM size, it made the problem much
less predictable, based on the am
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
> 1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning
> scheme. It also allows you to correctly make smaller partitions beyond
> 1TB which is nice if you don'
Based on this, are you recommending that the DISABLE_* still be used? Will
I never see the problem with 512mb of ram?
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> The amount of RAM will also affect it. It can also happen on P3's
> and AMD K6's. It is a CPU bug related to the use of 4M pages.
Le
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> > It only happens with P4's. I haven't seen it locally on a p4 test
> > machine at work that I have built test releases on. Also, it would be
> > nice to see if just adding one of the options fixed the problems. As
> > for NOTES,
Here are the diffs to allow disklabel to correctly create partitions >
1TB (up to 2TB is useful with UFS2) pending a different partitionning
scheme. It also allows you to correctly make smaller partitions beyond
1TB which is nice if you don't want to waste 800GB on an array :-)
permission to com
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> > This may be a bit overstated. I removed those options from my kernel a few
> > weeks ago and have no problems at all. Are you certain the problem is not
> > specific to a particular CPU?
>
> Sorry, this can be CPU specific, but I'm not sure. I'll try to
> reproduce it on
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
In the last episode (Nov 15), Ruslan Ermilov said:
> Yes, the standard search path is /boot/kernel;/boot/modules;/modules.
> Nevertheless, we don't create /modules, why should we create /boot/modules?
> When you say ``documented'', what do you mean? ``grep -r /boot/modules
> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1''
John Baldwin wrote:
> >> > > I'm getting tired of this email. Any objections to the patch below?
> >> >
> >> > aic7xxx is vendor-supported and changing it takes it off their p4
> >> > branch. I think gibbs@ has some patches to fix this but there are many
> >> > more problems in other drivers tha
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:43:16PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 15-Nov-2002 Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> He means 'nowerror' in sys/conf/files
> >
> > Since this doesn't generate errors on i386, would it be counterproductive
> > to put it in the global
On Fri Nov 15, 2002 at 10:10:13PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:03:58PM -0500, The Anarcat wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Can 5.x properly cross-buildworld a 4.x source tree?
> >
> > Background info.. I have 3 machines at home:
> >
> > 1- graphic workstation 1Ghz, 1Gbyte o
Martijn Pronk wrote:
"My program" is just anything that attempts to obtain a lock on a file
on the NFS filesystem. vi does this when opening an existing file, as
does mutt when opening a mailbox.
Well, that sure simplifies the problem of running your program. ;)
Thanks for the info, I wi
On 15-Nov-2002 Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>> He means 'nowerror' in sys/conf/files
>
> Since this doesn't generate errors on i386, would it be counterproductive
> to put it in the global files?
Yes. Hence it has not been done.
>> FWIW, the correct patch would
Here is a set of patches that alowed me to at least make a 1.5TB
partition on my raid set.
I am willing to bet that it breaks other platforms as I haven't
even compiled them but it's mainly mechanical editing.
is there a "Mr sysinstall" these days?
The set I posted for 4.7++ is different from th
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> He means 'nowerror' in sys/conf/files
Since this doesn't generate errors on i386, would it be counterproductive
to put it in the global files?
> FWIW, the correct patch would be to use %j and uintmax_t, not longs.
I believe this was not done due to Linu
On 15-Nov-2002 Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
>> * De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-15 ]
>> [ Subjecte: Re: alpha tinderbox failure ]
>> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
>> > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>> > > > ===> vinum
>> > > >
* De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-15 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: alpha tinderbox failure ]
> > > aic7xxx is vendor-supported and changing it takes it off their p4
> > > branch. I think gibbs@ has some patches to fix this but there are many
> > > more problems in other drivers tha
Nate Lawson wrote:
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
>I'm seeing a kernel panic on -current (9/26) when booting with a SanDisk
>ImageMate II USB comact flash reader plugged in. The panic occurs after
>the kernel has loaded when the first rc.d scripts execute (dumpon,
>vinum, etc).
Is this
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, Lars Eggert wrote:
> I'm seeing a kernel panic on -current (9/26) when booting with a SanDisk
> ImageMate II USB comact flash reader plugged in. The panic occurs after
> the kernel has loaded when the first rc.d scripts execute (dumpon,
> vinum, etc).
>
> If I boot with the
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Juli Mallett wrote:
> * De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-15 ]
> [ Subjecte: Re: alpha tinderbox failure ]
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > > ===> vinum
> > > > "Makefile", line 4441: warning: duplicate
* De: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-15 ]
[ Subjecte: Re: alpha tinderbox failure ]
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > > ===> vinum
> > > "Makefile", line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target "geom_bsd.o" ignored
> > > cc1: w
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> > ===> vinum
> > "Makefile", line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target "geom_bsd.o" ignored
> > cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> > /h/des/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c: In function `ahd_ddb_in':
> > /h/des/src/
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> ===> vinum
> "Makefile", line 4441: warning: duplicate script for target "geom_bsd.o" ignored
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /h/des/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c: In function `ahd_ddb_in':
> /h/des/src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/aic79xx_osm.c:1931: warning: unsigned
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
* Craig Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [021115 10:44] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you have any insight into the question that I recently posted
> to -current and -standards?
Sorry, I'm no longer subscribed to those lists. :(
I do appreciate you contacting me about this, see below...
>
> http://docs.free
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:45:16AM -0500, Robert Watson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It only happens with P4's. I haven't seen it locally on a p4 test
> > machine at work that I have built test releases on. Also, it would be
> > nice to see if just adding one of the options fixed the problems.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 02:40:32AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote the words in effect of:
> Folks,
>
> I have been using an mdconfig /tmp for quite a while. Today, running
> -current from 11/14 I got the following errors while doing an
> installworld after testing my bind 8.3.3-patched import stuff:
>
if i remember correctly, 5.0-release was supposed to ship
somewhen in november, isn't it?
any news on this?
thank you
p.s. i work for an italian magazine and we are planning
a special issue dedicated to freebsd-5.0, a tiny manual (64pages)
with an installation guide step-by-step, a prime-time c
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 15-Nov-2002 Wesley Morgan wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> >
> >> Just finished '-j2 buildworld' and it did well with kernel which had
> >> the options enabled. Therefore I suppose that those options are
> >> still absolutely n
On 15-Nov-2002 Wesley Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>
>> Just finished '-j2 buildworld' and it did well with kernel which had
>> the options enabled. Therefore I suppose that those options are
>> still absolutely necessary to make use of -current system. These
>
> Th
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2002/11/15 09:48), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off with
> > > more restrictive permissions, and have the administrator determine
> > > whether more restrictive permissions are appropriat
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:55:52AM -0500, Wesley Morgan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>
> > Just finished '-j2 buildworld' and it did well with kernel which had
> > the options enabled. Therefore I suppose that those options are
> > still absolutely neces
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Just finished '-j2 buildworld' and it did well with kernel which had
> the options enabled. Therefore I suppose that those options are
> still absolutely necessary to make use of -current system. These
This may be a bit overstated. I removed those opti
subscribe freebsd-current
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Mike Barcroft wrote:
> --
> >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Fri Nov 15 14:04:21 GMT 2002
> --
> ===> ipfilter
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> /tinderbox/sparc64/
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:59:32AM -0800, Terry Lambert
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The kernel compiled from yesterday sources and with the
> > abovementioned options disabled will not finish make -j2 buildworld
> > on P4. Dies with bus error:
> >
> > /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/termios.c: In functi
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:51:57PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
RE>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:47:59PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
RE>> > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>> > >
RE>> > >
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 03:35:18PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Anyone objects to this patch?
> >
> > Yes - this is the only place to put modules which are not built as part
> > of the kernel, for example /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm.
> >
> This port puts it under /usr/local/
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:51:57PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:47:59PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone objects to this patch?
> > >
> > > Yes - this is the
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:47:59PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone objects to this patch?
> >
> > Yes - this is the only place to put modules which are not built as part
> > of the kernel, for
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 12:47:59PM +, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > Anyone objects to this patch?
>
> Yes - this is the only place to put modules which are not built as part
> of the kernel, for example /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm.
>
This port puts it un
Thus spake Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > > I retained the int 12h fallback just to be safe, but I
> > > > think the bootinfo structure is initialized with a valid basemem
> > > > for all loaders since at least 1998. (Maybe the fallbacks in the
>
> Since 1995, but not in boot2 since 2002/
On (2002/11/15 14:45), Vallo Kallaste wrote:
> Yes. For what it's worth, I think that system should be airtight out
> of the box and the consequences for average desktop user (as I am)
> clearly documented in handbook. Users who will not read the fine
> documentation fully deserve the pain.
Well,
Thus spake Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps the problem with int 0x12 is the same as the one with int 0x15.
> Old implementations of int 0x12 just read the word at 0x40:0x13 in
> real or vm86 mode. This only requires physical page 0 to be mapped
> readable to work in vm86 calls. New imp
On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > This approach is okay with me in the sense that it doesn't break
> > > anything that wasn't already broken, but as you say, I think we
> > > can do better. Below is a patch that merely extracts the b
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Anyone objects to this patch?
Yes - this is the only place to put modules which are not built as part
of the kernel, for example /usr/ports/comms/ltmdm.
Gavin
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the b
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 04:29:50AM -0800, Kris Kennaway
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off with
> > > more restrictive permissions, and have the administrator determine
> > > whether more restrictive permissions are appropriate?
> >
>
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:48:56AM +0100, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > On (2002/11/14 19:27), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> >
> > > > - insecure permissions. Among other holes, these allowed the world to
> > > > erase cd-rw's.
> > >
> > > Use rc.devfs for that as it was
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Hmmm, I didn't notice that there is a BIOS which requires
> > memory area below 640K even when calling INT 15H/E820.
> >
> > We cannot trust that today's BOISes have INT 12H, so it's
> > difficult to det
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2002/11/15 09:48), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off with
> > > more restrictive permissions, and have the administrator determine
> > > whether more restrictive permissions are appropriate?
Vallo Kallaste wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> The kernel compiled from yesterday sources and with the
> abovementioned options disabled will not finish make -j2 buildworld
> on P4. Dies with bus error:
>
> /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/termios.c: In function `tcgetpgrp':
> /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/termios.c:104: intern
On Wed, 13 Nov 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Both have large namespace pollution (p and n are in the application
> > namespace). Both give huge code wih a copy of the function in every
> > object file whose source file(s) include this header if inline fu
Hi
The kernel compiled from yesterday sources and with the
abovementioned options disabled will not finish make -j2 buildworld
on P4. Dies with bus error:
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/termios.c: In function `tcgetpgrp':
/usr/src/lib/libc/gen/termios.c:104: internal error: Bus error
Please submit a full
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Patrick Fish wrote:
> When you upgrade to 5.0, you need to do the following things from
> console:
>
> cd /usr/src/sys/boot/ && make && make install
>
>
> This is because the kernel location was changed, so you need to make
> boot manually.
>
> I also suggest you compile pam.d
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Single-digit track numbers are correct and are still generated by MAKEDEV.
>
> Single digit track numbers are wrong and should be fixed in MAKEDEV.
I disagree.
> > Contrary to the log message, %02d is harder for scripts
Hello,
Few minutes ago I tried to upgrade 4.7 -> 5.0 (2002.11.15) and after
reboot I got problem:
Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI device to settle
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/da0s1a
sethostbyname failed
ffs_mountroot: can't find rootvp
Root mount failed: 6
mountroot> ?
On (2002/11/15 09:48), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> > Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off with
> > more restrictive permissions, and have the administrator determine
> > whether more restrictive permissions are appropriate?
>
> Actually no I dont.
> The security aware admin
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
RE>Hi!
RE>
RE>Anyone objects to this patch?
Yes. Where do a install my modules then, that don't build with the kernel?
harti
RE>
RE>%%%
RE>Index: BSD.root.dist
RE>===
RE>RCS file: /home/nc
It seems Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> On (2002/11/14 19:27), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
>
> > > - insecure permissions. Among other holes, these allowed the world to
> > > erase cd-rw's.
> >
> > Use rc.devfs for that as it was intended.
>
> Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off
On (2002/11/14 19:27), Soeren Schmidt wrote:
> > - insecure permissions. Among other holes, these allowed the world to
> > erase cd-rw's.
>
> Use rc.devfs for that as it was intended.
Don't you think it makes more sense for the kernel to start off with
more restrictive permissions, and have t
Hi!
Anyone objects to this patch?
%%%
Index: BSD.root.dist
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist,v
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -5 -r1.58 BSD.root.dist
--- BSD.root.dist 10 Jun 2002 04:47:26 - 1.58
+
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
69 matches
Mail list logo
