Re: stacktrace of recent panic..(bremfree)

2003-03-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Donn Miller wrote: > > > > Can you please disable sync on panic and get a dump from the first panic? > > Then print out the contents of the buf in that stack for me? A couple of > > people have seen this now but I have not been able to repro it. Thanks for the report. Pleas

Re: stacktrace of recent panic..(bremfree)

2003-03-13 Thread Donn Miller
Jeff Roberson wrote: On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: I got this today on a kernel checked out on the 10th. Can you please disable sync on panic and get a dump from the first panic? Then print out the contents of the buf in that stack for me? A couple of people have seen this now bu

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_map.c vm_map.h vm_pageout.c

2003-03-13 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > < said: > > > A real problem is that a swapped out process' uarea has to be > > paged back in, even when no memory is available. I don't think > > there's an easy way around that, given that you need the uarea and > > kernel stack to handle the si

NFS file unlocking problem

2003-03-13 Thread Steve Sizemore
Running RELENG_5_0 as nfs server with a Solaris 2.5 client. rpc.statd and rpc.lockd both running on FreeBSD, lockd and statd both running on Solaris. Locking a file (flock) works fine, but when an attempt to unlock it is made, the client session hangs. The program is typically (but not always) unin

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-03-13 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html -- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:47:50PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote: [...] > You can mount devfs into any places. For example a jail. > BTW, take extreme care, when doing this, because if you don't set up > devfs rules, anybody, who can become root in any jails can do things, > which will irreversibly chan

Re: Build error again.

2003-03-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:12:32PM -0800, Wade Klaver wrote: > That last error was generated running with -DNOCLEAN and -j 4. > I get this error running a plain make buildworld. > Thanx for any help/comments/suggestions in advance. This doesn't show the error because you are using -j4. However, i

Re: Vinum R5 [was: Re: background fsck deadlocks with ufs2 and big disk]

2003-03-13 Thread Greg 'groggy' Lehey
On Saturday, 1 March 2003 at 20:43:10 +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:53:02AM +0200, Vallo Kallaste wrote: > The vinum R5 and system as a whole were stable without softupdates. Only one problem remained after disabling softupdates, while being online and u

Re: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-13 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:24:03 +0100, Stefan Farfeleder wrote: > There's a patch from phk at http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/ken.patch which > works for me (though it breaks gkrellm :) Thaks! I missed previous thread of this subject. I'll try that patch. -- Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG S

Build error again.

2003-03-13 Thread Wade Klaver
That last error was generated running with -DNOCLEAN and -j 4. I get this error running a plain make buildworld. Thanx for any help/comments/suggestions in advance. building static ncurses library building shared library libncurses.so.5 building profiled ncurses library ranlib libncurses.a ranlib

subject should be CURRENT build error.

2003-03-13 Thread Wade Klaver
Sorry about that. :) -- Wade Klaver Wavefire Technologies Corporation GPG Public Key at http://archeron.wavefire.com /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ - To Unsubscribe

[no subject]

2003-03-13 Thread Wade Klaver
I just cvsup'd the '.' tag today. I get this build error. Is this the wrong tag for -CURRENT, or am I doing something else wrong? -W -- >>> stage 4: building libraries -- cd /

ATA mount failur (Was: Re: Panics with GnuPG)

2003-03-13 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Doug Barton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [03.03.13 13:27]: > Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of > sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to > yours, and hsu fixed it. I'd like to verify, but using updated sources as of about four hours ago, I

Re: devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-13 Thread Stefan Farfeleder
On Fri, Mar 14, 2003 at 07:11:35AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: > > I got this message after upgrading my world to as of Thu Mar 13 > 10:38:11 JST 2003. > > devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)! > devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)! > devstat_en

devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)!

2003-03-13 Thread Jun Kuriyama
I got this message after upgrading my world to as of Thu Mar 13 10:38:11 JST 2003. devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)! devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)! devstat_end_transaction: HELP!! busy_count for ad1 is < 0 (-1)! ... What does this me

Re: Fix for rtc, vmware modules and post-500104 -current

2003-03-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:09:27 +0900 Yoshinori KASAZAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hum.. This is not work in my environment. Because MOD_LOAD initializer > > didn't kick rtc_attach. I fixed this problem and merge(but ADHOC:-). > > Please, anyone, check following patch. > I've

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 12:45:24PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy writes: > >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: [...] > >On 5.0-RELEASE-p4 I have > >/usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV > >and i use it for making the devices in jails. > >Is there a

Bad ACPI timer causes uninterruptible hang on boot?

2003-03-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
I've been trying to figure out why my Intel SR2100 servers would not boot with ACPI enabled, hanging uninterruptibly after probing the ACPI timer. I experimented with disabling various subsystems, and came up with the following results: - With `pci_link' disabled, the boot gets as far as ``Device

Re: failed to set signal flags properly for ast()

2003-03-13 Thread Bruce Evans
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tim Robbins wrote: > Compile, run under gdb, then type "print test()" when the program receives > SIGABRT. Seems to work incorrectly on 4.7 too. > > #include > #include > > void > test(void) > { > > puts("hello"); > } > > int > main(int argc, char *argv[]) > { > >

Re: Digital Unix (Tru64) binaries on FreeBSD-Alpha

2003-03-13 Thread Scot Hetzel
moved to the FreeBSD-Alpha list, send all replies there. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Digital Unix (Tru64) binaries on FreeBSD-Alpha

2003-03-13 Thread Scot Hetzel
I maintain the www/apache13-fp and www/frontpage ports, and are supposed to work on FreeBSD-Alpha as they install the Digital Unix (Tru64) Frontpage Extentions binaries. Richard is trying to install the www/apache13-fp ports on his Alpha (5.0-RELEASE w/GENERIC kernel), but he is getting errors whe

Re: kernel panic in tcp_input.c:2252

2003-03-13 Thread leafy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 10:10:30AM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of > sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to > yours, and hsu fixed it. > > Doug The distributedfolding panic is also corrected. Jiawei -- "With

Re: Panics with GnuPG

2003-03-13 Thread Doug Barton
Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to yours, and hsu fixed it. On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Damian Gerow wrote: > I've managed to write down the actual panic twice (no panic to screen if > you're in X), You pro

Re: kernel panic in tcp_input.c:2252

2003-03-13 Thread Doug Barton
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Tobias Reifenberger wrote: > Am Di, 2003-03-11 um 17.43 schrieb KT Sin: > > > Another panic in tcp_input while exiting gtk-gnutella. Update your sources, and make sure that you have 1.202 of sys/netinet/tcp_input.c. I had a 100% reproducable panic very similar to yours, and h

Do we want to let cpp(1) hide warnings in system headers?

2003-03-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Sigh. It's been a while since I've fixed the "feature" of gcc(1) that makes it hide warnings in system headers (but visible with -nostdinc -I/usr/include). I've stumbled upon a problem today, wondering, why the hell cpp(1) wasn't complaining me about the redefines, and the answer was: GNU cpp(1)

Re: pppd + natd (was: Re: some bugs in natd.8)

2003-03-13 Thread Eivind Eklund
> > And I'm not active enough that I feel I have any right to any form of veto. > > > Thanks. I'm not against documenting "something", if I understand > what this "something" should be. That people absolutely should use ppp -nat instead of pppd+natd, and that this goes even if people ALREADY has

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_map.c vm_map.h vm_pageout.c

2003-03-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > A real problem is that a swapped out process' uarea has to be > paged back in, even when no memory is available. I don't think > there's an easy way around that, given that you need the uarea and > kernel stack to handle the signal. But you don't, actually -- at least not to ``handle''

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2003-03-13 Thread Mike Barcroft
Tinderbox FAQ: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~mike/tinderbox.html Thu Mar 13 11:38:00 EST 2003 cvs [update aborted]: /work/repo/CVSROOT: Interrupted system call To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: pppd + natd (was: Re: some bugs in natd.8)

2003-03-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 08:13:43AM -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:24:58AM -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: > > [...] > > > > Okay, here's my question: what is/was so bad about pppd + natd? > > > > > > Generati

RE:

2003-03-13 Thread John Baldwin
On 13-Mar-2003 Derek Tattersall wrote: > I found on tty0 the following backtrace. I infer, because it died in > malloc, that it has something to do with netisr problem. I had to > copy it by hand. I think Sam Leffler has already fixed this one. > backtrace(c04b7645,4,1,0,c40be100) at backtrace

Re: pppd + natd (was: Re: some bugs in natd.8)

2003-03-13 Thread Eivind Eklund
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 05:43:58PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:24:58AM -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: > [...] > > > Okay, here's my question: what is/was so bad about pppd + natd? > > > > Generating >10% of the total support load for FreeBSD on IRC is so bad > > about it

Status inquiry about disklabel(8) on sparc64

2003-03-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Dear Poul-Henning, What's the status of disklabel(8) on sparc64? What was the reason for not building it there? : phk 2003/01/26 04:19:36 PST : : Modified files: : sbin Makefile : Log: : Make disklabel(8) MD for i386/pc98 and alpha only. : : Revision Change

pppd + natd (was: Re: some bugs in natd.8)

2003-03-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 07:24:58AM -0800, Eivind Eklund wrote: [...] > > Okay, here's my question: what is/was so bad about pppd + natd? > > Generating >10% of the total support load for FreeBSD on IRC is so bad > about it. And I can't give you a better answer than that, because I > haven't suppo

Re: Just for Your Information

2003-03-13 Thread walt
CARTER Anthony wrote: Hi lads and lassies, I just tried to do a build world that failed, so I tried re-running it and it told me directory not empty (/usr/obj/usr/src/i386*)...Funny, even though the first thing it does is an rm -rf of that directory... So I tried to do it manually (of course as ro

Just for Your Information

2003-03-13 Thread CARTER Anthony
Hi lads and lassies, I just tried to do a build world that failed, so I tried re-running it and it told me directory not empty (/usr/obj/usr/src/i386*)...Funny, even though the first thing it does is an rm -rf of that directory... So I tried to do it manually (of course as root), but nada. Told m

Re: mbuf cache

2003-03-13 Thread Petri Helenius
Terry Lambert wrote: Ah. You are receiver livelocked. Try enabling polling; it will help up to the first stall barrier (NETISR not getting a chance to run protocol processing to completion because of interrupt overhead); there are two other stall barriers after that, and another in user space is

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > Hint: cp /dev/null /dev/[what is your root device outside the jail] I meant /dev/zero of course ;) (or /dev/random for the patient one) --[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]-- Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fre

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Attila Nagy
Hello, > On 5.0-RELEASE-p4 I have /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV and i use it for making > the devices in jails. Is there a jail devfs or is the way described in > the jail(8) man page still the right(tm) one? You can mount devfs into any places. For example a jail. BTW, take extreme care, when doing this,

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Andy writes: >On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: >> Hartmann, O. (Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:59:52PM +0100) wrote: >> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: >[...] >> > All right, a new 'think another way when going to FreeBSD 5.0 ...'

Re: MAKEDEV lost in 5.0-CURRENT?

2003-03-13 Thread Andy
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 12:18:08PM -0500, Hiten Pandya wrote: > Hartmann, O. (Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 04:59:52PM +0100) wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote: [...] > > All right, a new 'think another way when going to FreeBSD 5.0 ...'. > > It also helps when you read src/UPDATING :-

if_dc warning messages

2003-03-13 Thread Ilmar S. Habibulin
I've cvsuped to -current from 11-12 march and afer booting new kernel got repeated messages from kernel to syslog and console. Mar 13 13:50:38 ws-ilmar kernel: malloc() of "128" with the following non-sleepablelocks held: Mar 13 13:50:38 ws-ilmar kernel: exclusive sleep mutex dc0 (network driver)

Re: crash: bwrite: need chained iodone

2003-03-13 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2003-03-12, Jeff Roberson écrivait : > Can you disable sync on panic to make sure that something has not come > along and cleaned this buffer? I suspect that it has been modified after > the first panic. Do you know when this first started to happen? Do you > have any more clues into what tr

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 18:08:01 +0900 Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RAM speed setting! Ah, I don't test it yet. I'll change speed > setting and test. I seted FastCommand: normal from ultra on `Configure SDRAM Timing by, FastCommand'. More robust and red

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 00:41:37 -0800 (PST) Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We had a similar problem some time ago that turned out to be bad RAM in > one case and a bad CMOS BIOS setting in another. (RAM speed setting). RAM speed setting! Ah, I don't test it yet. I'll change spe

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 03:36:41 -0500 (EST) Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does your machine log ECC errors? If so can you check for them in the > BIOS? If you don't make world and jdk14 does this problem still show up? My machine uses non-ECC unbuffered DDR SDRAM(Transcend - Sa

Re: stacktrace of recent panic..(bremfree)

2003-03-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I got this today on a kernel checked out on the 10th. Can you please disable sync on panic and get a dump from the first panic? Then print out the contents of the buf in that stack for me? A couple of people have seen this now but I have not been a

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > (snip) > Thu Mar 13 15:47:59 JST 2003 MD5 (OOo_1.0.2_source.tar.bz2) = > 8a82b4dbdd4e305b6f6db70ea65dce8c > Thu Mar 13 15:48:13 JST 2003 MD5 (OOo_1.0.2_source.tar.bz2) = > 8a82b4dbdd4e305b6f6db70ea65dce8c > Thu Mar 13 15:48:32 JST 200

stacktrace of recent panic..(bremfree)

2003-03-13 Thread Julian Elischer
I got this today on a kernel checked out on the 10th. panic: bremfree: removing a buffer not on a queue panic messages: --- panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy??? syncing disks, buffers remaining... panic: bremfree: removing a buffer not on a queue Uptime: 46m53s Dumping 255 MB ata0: resetting de

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote: > On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:23:00 -0500 (EST) > Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How much memory is in your machine? Can you go back to an earlier date > > > and see if this is still a problem? Are you doing anything else with the > > > m

Re: big file became broken on 2003-03-11(cvsuped)

2003-03-13 Thread Norikatsu Shigemura
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 01:23:00 -0500 (EST) Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How much memory is in your machine? Can you go back to an earlier date > > and see if this is still a problem? Are you doing anything else with the > > machine while this is going on? 512MB. I u

INVARIANTS hide bugs (malloc/uma related)? (was: Re: latest working snapshot?)

2003-03-13 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 10:32:01PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 02:14:25PM -0500, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > I need to install current on a new box that just arrived. > > What's the latest working snapshot? > > > > 20030312-JPSNAP get about 40% of the way through t

RE: lock order reversal? current with tl ethernet

2003-03-13 Thread Tod McQuillin
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, John Baldwin wrote: > It's holding the lock across bus_setup_intr(). You can try the > following patch: > > Index: if_tl.c > === > RCS file: /usr/cvs/src/sys/pci/if_tl.c,v > retrieving revision 1.74 > diff -u -r1

Re: kern/49079: panic: bwrite: buffer is not busy

2003-03-13 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Doug Barton wrote: > FYI, -bugs is not a discussion list. > > On Tue, 11 Mar 2003, Attila Nagy wrote: > > > The following reply was made to PR kern/49079; it has been noted by GNATS. > > > > From: Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Martin Machacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >

network problems on -current ?

2003-03-13 Thread Holm Tiffe
Hi, An -current (cvsupped yesterday) has some unusual problems, connection resets from local sendmail, or something like this: # ktrace uname -a FreeBSD lolo.freibergnet.de 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #7: Wed Mar 12 22:29:49 CET 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/LOLO i386 # ktr