Re: fla.ko

David Yeske wrote this message on Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 19:21 -0700: > I'm wondering what needs to be done to make the "fla" device into a kernel module. > I made modules/fla/Makefile, but I am not sure what else needs to be done. > It looks like you can't kldunload it after you kldload it... You n

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. > For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other things to > discuss. :) This adds a bit of time to buildworld, can it be removed? Gordon, 'make worl

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2003-07-14 06:40:25 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-07-14 06:40:25 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-14 06:42:29 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re: IPFW and/or rc rule parsing not working since today's cvsup

just committed a fix cheers luigi On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 01:31:07PM +0100, Matt wrote: > > Matt said: > > I normally sync to current once a week and have just done it today: > > > > FreeBSD tao.xtaz.co.uk 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Sun Jul 13 > > 12:24:40 BST 2003 [

Re: FFS_ROOT is gone?

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:22:41AM +0200, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Hello, > > my kernel (5.1-REL) can't mount root (mountroot>) on my CF-card although > it's booting fine and I can mount the card on my USB card reader. > I had a look at GENERIC and saw that I didn't miss the option FFS_ROOT bu

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2003-07-14 11:12:19 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2003-07-14 11:12:19 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/sparc64/sparc64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-14 11:14:29 - building world TB

RE: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

Ok...Been systematically stepping through the sources to locate the point at which NIS became broken. Here are the results: -CURRENT src date report --- --- 2003.06.18.00.00.00 success 2003.06.25.00.00.00 success 2003.06.26.00.00.00 success 2003.06.27.00.

Making a disk bootable...

Hi This might sound like a really simple question, but what used to work no longer does. How do you partition, label and make a disk bootable? I've used fdisk to create one slice (da0s1). I then used bsdlabel to make make the partitions a, b, e and f. Then to put the boot block on 'disklabel -

RE: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > Ok...Been systematically stepping through the sources to locate the point at > which NIS became broken. Here are the results: > > -CURRENT src date report > --- --- > 2003.06.18.00.00.00 success > 2003.06.25.00.00

Re: Making a disk bootable...

* Ian Freislich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-14 13:58:39 BST]: > Hi > > This might sound like a really simple question, but what used to > work no longer does. How do you partition, label and make a disk > bootable? And this may sound like a really stupid answer, but have you considered using /s

Re: Making a disk bootable...

Peter McGarvey wrote: > * Ian Freislich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-07-14 13:58:39 BST]: > > Hi > > > > This might sound like a really simple question, but what used to > > work no longer does. How do you partition, label and make a disk > > bootable? > > And this may sound like a really stupid an

Belkin USB2serial F5U103

According to the release note the Belkin F5U103 should be supported. I could not get it to operate, the device is recognized but cannot be configured. Anyone got the Belkin to cooperate with 5.2-current? We tried several other adapters (not mentioned in the release note) and found that they wor

Re: Belkin USB2serial F5U103

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:57:54 +0200 Guenter Doerrhoefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > According to the release note the Belkin F5U103 should be supported. I > > could not get it to operate, the device is recognized but cannot be > configured. Anyone got the Belkin to cooperate with 5.2-current? H

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:18:52PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > I have imported acpica 0619. I will be gone for a few hours but will be > checking again tonight in case there are any problems. I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't have any runtime regressions for

ata raid crash

It seems that the ata driver still has some issues with configuring the RAID devices. Sources cvsupped today. Pete Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 198

Re: Making a disk bootable...

Hi Ian! Ian Freislich writes: > I've used fdisk to create one slice (da0s1). I then used bsdlabel > to make make the partitions a, b, e and f. Then to put the boot > block on 'disklabel -B /dev/da0s1' - if I 'disklabel -B /dev/da0' > it trashes the label. Then I copy all my filesystems off the

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 04:18:52PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > I have imported acpica 0619. I will be gone for a few hours but will be > > checking again tonight in case there are any problems. > > I wasn't able to test the update before it was commit

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. > > For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other things to > > discuss. :) This a

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:09:52AM -0700, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. > > > For instance, groff is

Re: Making a disk bootable...

Mark Murray wrote: > Hi Ian! > > Ian Freislich writes: > > I've used fdisk to create one slice (da0s1). I then used bsdlabel > > to make make the partitions a, b, e and f. Then to put the boot > > block on 'disklabel -B /dev/da0s1' - if I 'disklabel -B /dev/da0' > > it trashes the label. Then I

Re: Making a disk bootable...

Ian Freislich wrote this message on Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 18:48 +0200: > I've just tried this dd'ing /dev/zero over the front of the disk > first to no avail (the probed geometry is the geometry that fdisk > used anyway). I also tried your much loved ficticious geometry of > 255H 64S and that didn'

ivar changes in newbus?

I'm getting these warnings when building sys/modules/acpi: cc -O -pipe -mcpu=pentiumpro -I/home/src/sys/modules/acpi/../../contrib/dev/acpica -D_KERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mark Santcroos wrote: > I wasn't able to test the update before it was committed, but it doesn't > have any runtime regressions for me so far, so that's good! Good. So far things look ok, no reports of new regression. > However, something I haven't seen reported before, is t

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:21:56AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging > > section in the modules/acpi/Makefile. > > However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from simply just > > working that I am looking into n

Re: Making a disk bootable...

John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Ian Freislich wrote this message on Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 18:48 +0200: > > I've just tried this dd'ing /dev/zero over the front of the disk > > first to no avail (the probed geometry is the geometry that fdisk > > used anyway). I also tried your much loved ficticious geome

firewire problem on 5.1-RELEASE

Hi guys, there's some new bug in firewire driver in 5.1-RELASE. When I connect camera to ma Dell Precision 530 box via firewire I get following messages: fwohci0: BUS reset fwohci0: node_id=0x0800ffc0, gen=37, Bus reset failure fwohci0: node_id=0x8800ffc0, gen=77, non CYCLEMASTER mode fwohci0: SI

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:21:56AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > The first thing to do is to add the new file dmobject.c to the debugging > > > section in the modules/acpi/Makefile. > > > However, there are some more hairy things that prevent it from

Re: Error building /rescue on -current

Garance A Drosihn wrote: Has anyone mentioned problems in buildworld in the building of the new /rescue directory? Yes, they have. make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/rescue/rescue//usr/src/sbin/dhclient/client/clparse.o. Stop *** Error code 2 I am building with -j5 on a dual-proces

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

At 9:09 AM -0700 7/14/03, Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > Gordon, 'make world' times have climbed up to over 1 hour > on a machine that used to do it in 25 minutes. Can you > please commit to understanding how /resuce is build and optimizing

Re: Error building /rescue on -current

Tim Kientzle wrote this message on Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:50 -0700: > So far, every report of this problem has had these two > elements in common: > > * parallel builds > * dhclient/client/clparse.o > > I've tried tracing through the crunchgen-generated Makefile for > /rescue (/usr/obj/usr/src

RE: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

That did it Using latest -CURRENT sources, but backing out to src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c,v 1.81 gets NIS clients working again. Re-sync this in CVS ? Thanks everyone. --- Robin P. Blanchard Systems Integration Specialist Georgia Center for Continuing Educ

RE: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Robin P. Blanchard wrote: > That did it > > Using latest -CURRENT sources, but backing out to > src/lib/libc/gen/getpwent.c,v 1.81 gets NIS clients working again. Re-sync > this in CVS ? The change (rev 1.82) to getpwent.c allows FreeBSD NIS clients to work with Solaris

Re: HEADSUP: acpica 0619 in the tree

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:43:33AM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > > > A fix has been tested and committed. > > > > dmobject.c has not been added to sys/conf/files.* > > Thanks, that has been committed. Thanks :-) -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

In our implementation, the NIS server is ActiveDirectory with ServicesForUnix 3.0 :) > -Original Message- > From: Daniel Eischen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 2:13 PM > To: Robin P. Blanchard > Cc: John De Boskey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jacques A. Vidrine > Subject:

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

David Leimbach wrote: > This is a good policy in general, however, one could easily argue that > what is trying to be determined with signedness and such being > less-than-compared > to 0 isn't really a big deal and possibly the only way to implement this > numeric_limits::digits thing without any

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2003-07-14 17:34:02 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-07-14 17:34:02 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-14 17:37:16 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: Error building /rescue on -current

John-Mark Gurney wrote: I happen to notice an interesting problem on my build.. (-j3 on a sparc64 box): make: don't know how to make /usr/obj/usr/src/world/src/rescue/rescue//usr/src/w orld/src/sbin/dhclient/client/clparse.o. Stop *** Error code 2 notice the rescue//usr. I'm not sure what to make

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

> In our implementation, the NIS server is ActiveDirectory with ServicesForUnix > 3.0 :) Ok, first, shame on you for waiting until now to reveal this piece of information. (Although, I'm coming into this thread late, so if you mentioned it in a previous message and I wasn't able to find it, then

Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with new gcc)

After -current update (with gcc version 3.3.1) and make world vim gets bus error ... I will rebuild the world and report, if it makes a difference. Same behaviour on comparable machines after compiler update ?? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ vim Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS Vim: Finished. Bus error (core d

Re: GDB - do we dare?

Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 16:49:12 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 01:05:00PM +0200, Mark Kettenis wrote: >Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:50:02 -0700 >From: Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Gang, > >With the gcc(1)

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 01:53:29PM -0400, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 9:09 AM -0700 7/14/03, Gordon Tetlow wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > Gordon, 'make world' times have climbed up to over 1 hour > > > on a machine that used to do it in 25 minutes.

acpi not working

Hello - My machine is a Dell Inspiron 2650 notebook. wind# kldstat Id Refs AddressSize Name 18 0xc010 3c4414 kernel 21 0xc04c5000 4b440acpi.ko 32 0xc28f9000 18000linux.ko 41 0xc2914000 186000 nvidia.ko wind# acpiconf -e wind# acpiconf -d wind# acpiconf

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:13:20PM +0200, Andreas Klemm wrote: > After -current update (with gcc version 3.3.1) and make world > vim gets bus error ... > > I will rebuild the world and report, if it makes a difference. > Same behaviour on comparable machines after compiler update ?? > > [EMAIL PR

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other things to discuss. :)

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Gordon Tetlow wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:40:42AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >>On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > >>>It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. > >>>Fo

freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Andreas wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ vim > Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS > Vim: Finished. > Bus error (core dumped) You can work around this by unsetting SESSION_MANAGER in your environment. I have no idea what the root cause is...

Re: Belkin USB2serial F5U103

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Guenter Doerrhoefer wrote: > According to the release note the Belkin F5U103 should be supported. I > could not get it to operate, the device is recognized but cannot be > configured. Anyone got the Belkin to cooperate with 5.2-current? Heh, this reminded me to actually test

Re: acpi not working

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, David Hill wrote: > Hello - > My machine is a Dell Inspiron 2650 notebook. > > wind# kldstat > Id Refs AddressSize Name > 18 0xc010 3c4414 kernel > 21 0xc04c5000 4b440acpi.ko > 32 0xc28f9000 18000linux.ko > 41 0xc2914000 186000 nvidi

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2003-07-14 18:42:18 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2003-07-14 18:42:18 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-14 18:44:34 - building world TB --- cd /home

Re:

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 09:51:25PM +0200, Thorsten Greiner wrote: > Andreas wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ vim > > Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS > > Vim: Finished. > > Bus error (core dumped) > > You can work around this by unsetting SESSION_MANAGER in your > environment. I have no idea what the

Re: GCC 3.3.1, new warnings with

On Monday, July 14, 2003, at 01:33PM, Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >David Leimbach wrote: >> This is a good policy in general, however, one could easily argue that >> what is trying to be determined with signedness and such being >> less-than-compared >> to 0 isn't really a big deal

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

> > You can work around this by unsetting SESSION_MANAGER in your > > environment. I have no idea what the root cause is... > > Where can I get rid of this variable ? I see no easy way. > Currently I use gvim as default text editor within KDE > environment ... > > In an xterm or such I could disab

Re: Vim: Caught deadly signal BUS (after -current update with newgcc)

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:38:44PM +0200, Thorsten Greiner wrote: > > > You can work around this by unsetting SESSION_MANAGER in your > > > environment. I have no idea what the root cause is... > > > > Where can I get rid of this variable ? I see no easy way. > > Currently I use gvim as default te

compile error on moby with newly gcc 3.3.1

Hi, I tried to update a machine which will become a webserver in near future. I received following error in buildkernel: [...] cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall \ -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline \ -W

Re: Help diagnosing NIS breakage ?

> > > In our implementation, the NIS server is ActiveDirectory with > > > ServicesForUnix 3.0 :) > > > > Ok, first, shame on you for waiting until now to reveal this > > piece of information. (Although, I'm coming into this thread > > late, so if you mentioned it in a previous message and I >

``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: input: Resource temporarily unavailable What does it mean, why does it happen, and how can I prevent it? Thanks a lot! -mi P.S. Running recent -current. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: Gordon Tetlow wrote: On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as part of buildworld. For instance, groff is NOT part of /rescue (or we have other th

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:15:01PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Gordon Tetlow wrote: > >On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 12:44:05PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > >>Gordon Tetlow wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 09:49:46PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > >It appears /rescue is cleaning for way too much as

Re: Broadcom NetXtreme BCM5705M support

Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, Boris Georgiev had to walk into mine and say: > Kenneth, > > As I already posted William, I have bad news - it doesn't work for me. I > rebuilt kernel yesterday with > the patched sources and the only thing that happened is that the kernel

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 06:08:32PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: > > input: Resource temporarily unavailable > > What does it mean, why does it happen, and how can I prevent it? I suspect vi's not handling an EAGAIN error return. I ge

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

Mikhail Teterin writes: >Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: > > input: Resource temporarily unavailable Are you running ksh93 per chance? I've seen this after I started an OpenGL program such as xscreensaver-demo from ksh93 (however that could have influenced the terminal

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

Gordon Tetlow wrote: Attached is the patch. It basically makes CRUNCH_PROGS into a per directory item and then only does a make obj on the per program directory. Hmmm I do have a philosophical quibble with your approach: My original intent for this Makefile was that the top part was rescue-sp

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 03:48:33PM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote: > Gordon Tetlow wrote: > >Attached is the patch. It basically makes CRUNCH_PROGS into a per > >directory item and then only does a make obj on the per program > >directory. > > Hmmm I do have a philosophical quibble with your > app

Re: ivar changes in newbus?

This is a complaint from the new compiler. That's what changed. Warner ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

- Original Message - From: "Matthias Buelow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mikhail Teterin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 3:43 PM Subject: Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi > Mikhail Teterin writes: > > >Every once

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

=>Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: => => input: Resource temporarily unavailable =Are you running ksh93 per chance? I've seen this after I started an =OpenGL program such as xscreensaver-demo from ksh93 (however that =could have influenced the terminal settings or whateve

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 12:43:40AM +0200, Matthias Buelow wrote: > Mikhail Teterin writes: > > >Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: > > > > input: Resource temporarily unavailable > > Are you running ksh93 per chance? I've seen this after I started an > OpenGL program such a

Trouble with ACPI and ASUS MB

I installed 5.1 RELEASE on a box with an ASUS A7A266 motherboard. Not having done enough reading, I had put device apm in the kernel and added apmd_enable="YES" to /etc/rc.conf. The box wouldn't turn off in response to shutdown -p. I then looked through NOTES and added device acpi, which fixed

current iso snapshots

is there a definitive zone for snapshots of current?? i stumbled upon this but my local mirror doesn't have any.. lftp ntu.tw.freebsd.org:/FreeBSD/snapshots/i386/ISO-IMAGES> 5.1-RELEASE didn't like my stinkpad.. i'm ready to try anything!! ;) cheers, ajt. ___

newbus questions

I'm working on ECDT support for ACPI and ran into a couple newbus-related questions. 1. I'm using the identify entry as a way to get called early on in the boot process. However, this does not happen before $PIR evaluation. How should I hook in a routine for pre-$PIR execution? 2. I need to cal

Re: current iso snapshots

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 10:31:19AM +1000, Andrew Thomson wrote: > is there a definitive zone for snapshots of current?? http://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/ -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 p

Re: compile error on moby with newly gcc 3.3.1

Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi, I tried to update a machine which will become a webserver in near future. I received following error in buildkernel: [...] cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall \ -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline

failed to set signal flags properly for ast()

I am getting dozens of these on my desktop machine since upgrading. Can someone please add some proper debugging information to this codepath so I can help to track them down? Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: current iso snapshots

Howdy, My Thinkpads (i1200, TP600) work OK, but you can't use ACPI on them with the default DSDT. Press Space at the boot loader countdown, then issue: set hint.acpi.0.disabled=1 boot Your Thinkpad should then boot OK. AFAIK some newer functionality may be lost without ACPI support. If this wo

src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

With new gcc and -Wshadow, src/bin/ed/re.c shows this warning: cc -Wshadow -c re.c re.c: In function `get_compiled_pattern': re.c:44: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a global declaration :0: warning: shadowed declaration is here It seems local variable exp is conflicted with exp(3) declara

Re: newbus questions

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Nate Lawson wrote: >I'm working on ECDT support for ACPI and ran into a couple newbus-related >questions. > >1. I'm using the identify entry as a way to get called early on in the >boot process. However, this does not happen before $PIR evaluation. How >should I ho

Re: newbus questions

In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I'm working on ECDT support for ACPI and ran into a couple newbus-related : questions. : : 1. I'm using the identify entry as a way to get called early on in the : boot process. However, this does not happen bef

buildkernel fails on -CURRENT

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Here's the error message... cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual -fformat-extensions -std=c99 -nostdinc -I- -I. -I/usr/src/sys -I/u

Re: make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box

* Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Date: 2003-07-13 ] [ w.r.t. Re: make release of CURRENT on 4.7 box ] > On Sun, 13 Jul 2003, Tim Kientzle wrote: > > > Bruce Evans wrote: > > > I think splitting it or making it exit after just setting variables > > > in the userland case is the right fix

Re: newbus questions

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Let's take a step back. What are you trying to do? I need to install a temporary EC handler before the namespace is evaluated. This is because various other ACPI routines will call the EC before acpi_ec_attach is called (just after sio1 attach on my l

Re: newbus questions

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Nate Lawson wrote: > 3. It appears bus_alloc_resource() takes a range of values. If I know the > exact value to use, I request it via "value, value" instead of "0, ~0". > Is this correct? It's correct if you really know the values, unlike "0, ~0". The maximum value for a re

Gcc compiling problems

I've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled here's whyI've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled here's why : contrib/gcc/ggc.h: including non-existent file gtype-desc.h contrib/gcc/bitmap.c: including non-existent file gt-bitmap.h gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/Makefile: .

Re: buildkernel fails on -CURRENT

Fixed! sorry. - Original Message - From: "Greg J." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 10:55 AM Subject: buildkernel fails on -CURRENT > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Here's the error message... > > cc -c -O -pipe -march=penti

Re: Trouble with ACPI and ASUS MB

On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Scott Robbins wrote: > It didn't. For the heck of it, I then tried recompiling the kernel with > the device acpi put back in, despite the possible dangers, but it didn't > work either. kldstat shows that the acip module is loaded. The error > that I get is ACPI timed out. >

Re: Gcc compiling problems

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Divacky Roman wrote: > I've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled > here's whyI've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled > here's why : Try removing /usr/obj/* and rebuild. -- Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve [EMAIL

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on alpha/alpha

TB --- 2003-07-15 04:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha TB --- 2003-07-15 04:00:01 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-15 04:02:00 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: Gcc compiling problems

On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 06:23:05AM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > I've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled > here's whyI've just upgraded to -current and gcc cannot be compiled > here's why : Update and try again. Please monitor this list and the cvs commit logs if you plan to tra

Re: src/bin/ed/re.c: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a globaldeclaration

On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote: JK> JK>With new gcc and -Wshadow, src/bin/ed/re.c shows this warning: JK> JK>cc -Wshadow -c re.c JK>re.c: In function `get_compiled_pattern': JK>re.c:44: warning: declaration of `exp' shadows a global declaration JK>:0: warning: shadowed declaration is here

Process stats wrong under ULE

I'm seeing the following kind of behaviour under ULE on a UP machine (kernel updated earlier this evening). Notice that the total CPU% adds up to way more than 100%; indeed one single process is allegedly using more than 100% CPU, and (not clear from the top(1) output) the processes that are sleep

[-CURRENT tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2003-07-15 05:12:26 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2003-07-15 05:12:26 - checking out the source tree TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2003-07-15 05:14:20 - building world TB --- cd /

Re: Overdone rescue cleaning as part of buildworld?

Gordon Tetlow wrote: Attached is the patch. It basically makes CRUNCH_PROGS into a per directory item and then only does a make obj on the per program directory. Tim Kientzle whined: Hmmm I do have a philosophical quibble ... Gordon Tetlow generously suggested: That could probably be solved wi

More Broadcom BCM5705 updates

I have merged in some additional updates provided by Paul Saab: - Support the BCM5782 chip (5705 workalike, new PCI ID) - Increase firmware handshake timeout - Always check for GMII PHYs at PHY address 1 (required for some chips, doesn't hurt on the others) - Add ASIC rev numbers for 5705_A1, 5

buildkernel error with -CURRENT on moby with newly gcc 3.3.1

Hi, I tried to update a machine which will become a webserver in near future. I received following error in buildkernel: [...] cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall \ -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline \ -W

Re: buildkernel error with -CURRENT on moby with newly gcc 3.3.1

Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to update a machine which will become a webserver in > near future. I received following error in buildkernel: > > [...] > > cc -c -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -Wall \ > -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes \ > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpoin

Re: ``Resource temporarily unavailable'' in vi

Mikhail Teterin writes: > Every once in a while, a vi-session dies on me with: > > input: Resource temporarily unavailable > > What does it mean, why does it happen, and how can I prevent it? > > Thanks a lot! > > -mi > > P.S. Running recent -current. I'm seeing this on current. I