> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:23:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> Well i've enabled all SMP options, recompiled and rebooted. The CPUs now
>> properly show up in dmesg and i can see the C header in top. However no
>> processes seem to be being assigned to cpu 1. Why is the schedueler only
>
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, Rus Foster wrote:
> I'm playing with jail on FBSD5 and wondered if there was anyway I could
> use top without have to create /dev/mem. ATM anyone in the jail could
> just do cat /dev/mem | grep for_intresting_stuff. Any ideas?
>
> Tried using devfs and still no luck
top sh
Did you do "sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus=0"?
Default setting halt logical CPUs, and won't start HTT.
This is a kind of FAQ, and you will see a lot in the past
mailing-list.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
+--- On Saturday, August 23, 2003 21:18,
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] proclaimed:
|
| > On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 10:23:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| >> Well i've enabled all SMP options, recompiled and rebooted. The CPUs
| >> now properly show up in dmesg and i can see the C header in top.
| >> Howe
On Saturday, 23 August 2003 at 5:05:11 -0700, Rostislav Krasny wrote:
> When FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE had been released I tried to install it from
> floppies. I got system panic and then reported this problem into
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. You can find this report in
> http://www.atm.tut.fi/lis
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
--Boundary-02=_Nn+R/bAN6Fk+pt3
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi all,
I can confirm something is wrongwith pcm.
I have no sound output with todays ker
On Sunday 24 August 2003 00:25, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I can confirm something is wrongwith pcm.
> I have no sound output with todays kernel, the one some weeks ago I had no
> problems.
Ok, things are fine again.
I just cvsupped and saw that something AC97 related has changed.
W
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> I have had an ongoing problem with -current freezing during a restart
> of the X serer. The graphics card is an ATI Radeon 9100. I am pretty
> sure this is related to DRI as I have not had it happen with DRI
> disabled.
>
> I am no
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 20:38, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > I have had an ongoing problem with -current freezing during a restart
> > of the X serer. The graphics card is an ATI Radeon 9100. I am pretty
> > sure this is related to DRI
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 09:40:55PM -0700, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 20:38, Glenn Johnson wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 02:11:15PM -0500, Glenn Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > I have had an ongoing problem with -current freezing during a
> > > restart of the X serer. The graph
>
> snapshot.jp.freebsd.org and jp.freebsd.org do not permit
> anonymous logins.
>
there is also snapshots.se.freebsd.org, although our current buildslave is
currently under maintinance and will not be back up again until wednesday
next week. and we do allow anonymous logins
Matt
www.fruits
ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
-Søren
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
At 9:40 PM -0700 2003/08/23, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Also please teach your email client to word wrap. That's nasty.
According to your headers, you're using Ximian Evolution 1.4.4.
According to his headers, he's running Mutt/1.5.4i.
You tell me.
--
Brad Knowles, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"They th
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ported the openbsd additions to the sk driver to support the 3c940
> gigabit network card which is commonly found in the above asus
> motherboard. Testers/comments/commits welcome, but please don't blame
> me if it burns yo
On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I ported the openbsd additions to the sk driver to support the 3c940
> > gigabit network card which is commonly found in the above asus
> > motherboard. Testers/comments
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I ported the openbsd additions to the sk driver to support the 3c940
> > > gigabit network card wh
Stuart Walsh wrote:
On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
Hi,
I ported the openbsd additions to the sk driver to support the 3c940
gigabit network card which is commonly found in the above asus
motherboard. Testers/comments
> ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
> update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
That should make ATA-run SMP boxes eligible for an impressive increase
in I/O performance... has anyone
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
...
> > Unfortunately my Asus P4P800 still locks up solid (reset button required)
> > after printing the 3c940's ethern
It seems Roderick van Domburg wrote:
> > ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this
> > update as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
>
> Coolness. Judging from the CVS log, it also gets ATA out under Giant?
Yes it does.
> That should make ATA-run SMP boxes elig
I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don't
immediatly know what's wrong.
I have the following hardware:
ad0: 76319MB
It seems Matt wrote:
> I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
> kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
> kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don't
> immediatly know what's wrong.
>
> I have the
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Matt wrote:
> This did work perfectly with the old ATA, but the new ATA panic's. I have
> found that it is due to having device atapicam for the SCSI emulation. If I
> recompile the kernel with this option commented out the kernel boots and
> everything works normally (except
It seems Wesley Morgan wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Matt wrote:
>
> > This did work perfectly with the old ATA, but the new ATA panic's. I have
> > found that it is due to having device atapicam for the SCSI emulation. If I
> > recompile the kernel with this option commented out the kernel boots
On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > --On Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:27:59 -0400 Daniel Eischen
> >
(...)
> > >
> > > We (threads guys) think it's a problem with konsole. It is trying
> > > to change ownership of the pty and is
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
> as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
Does ATAng still "kill" various Seagate drives?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Matt wrote:
> > I have just cvsup'd and done a full buildworld/kernel and on reboot had a
> > kernel panic. Unfortunatly I do not have ddb or anything compiled into the
> > kernel but I can sort this out and get a proper backtrace etc if you don
It seems David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 11:27:05AM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > ATAng has just been committed. You need to make world after this update
> > as atacontrol etc needs to pick up the changes.
>
> Does ATAng still "kill" various Seagate drives?
Uhm ? what do you mea
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it
> > to be around :)
>
> I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam
> has been present for a while, and it should have been tested and made
> to work -- at least s
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > This is a case for Thomas I guess, atapicam is his baby I just allow it
> > > to be around :)
> >
> > I appreciate all the work you've done for ATA. But that said, atapicam
> > has been present for a while, and it s
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > > --On Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:27:59 -0400 Daniel Eischen
> > >
> (...)
> > > >
> > > > We (threads guys) think it's a problem with konsol
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jens Rehsack writes:
>I have 2 machines with P4P800-Deluxe with the 3C940. If phk@ could fix
>the swap-issue, so that I can reboot easily, I would test your patches,
>too.
"swap-issue" ?
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 01:06:28PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>
> ganymede# sysctl machdep.hlt_logical_cpus
> sysctl: unknown oid 'machdep.hlt_logical_cpus'
> ganymede# uname -a
> FreeBSD ganymede.hub.org 5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Sat Aug 23 00:08:54 ADT
> 2003 [EMAIL PROTECT
Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:27:59 -0400 Daniel Eischen
(...)
We (threads guys) think it's a problem with konsole. It is trying
to change ownership of the pty and is
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 06:59:20PM -0500, Loren James Rittle wrote:
> Trying to consider how to best pull important differences back into
> the FSF tree. Will this be true for all FreeBSD systems going forward?
>
> < %{!dynamic-linker:-dynamic-linker /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1}}
> ---
> >
On Sunday 24 August 2003 18:55, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> Arjan van Leeuwen wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >>On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> >>>--On Saturday, August 23, 2003 10:27:59 -0400 Daniel Eischen
> >
> > (...)
> >
> We (threads guys) t
TB --- 2003-08-24 16:00:01 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-08-24 16:00:01 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/alpha/alpha
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src
TB --- 2003-08-24 16:01:54 - building world
TB --- cd /
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:06:52 +0200 Arjan van Leeuwen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kde@, has already found the problem. Turns out
konsole will crash in recent -CURRENT (post-15 august) if you have a
hostname longer than 16 characters because of a change in gethostname (I
guess). Sorry t
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:11:20 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:06:52 +0200 Arjan van Leeuwen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
kde@, has already found the problem. Turns out
konsole will crash in recent -CURRENT (post-15 august) if you have a
ho
On Sunday 24 August 2003 19:17, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> --On Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:11:20 -0500 Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > --On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:06:52 +0200 Arjan van Leeuwen
> >
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> kde@, has already found the problem. Turns out
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:20:07 +0200 Arjan van Leeuwen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 24 August 2003 19:17, Larry Rosenman wrote:
--On Sunday, August 24, 2003 12:11:20 -0500 Larry Rosenman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --On Sunday, August 24, 2003 19:06:52 +0200 Arjan van Leeuwen
>
Hello.
(B
(BI was update 5-current and begin using with ATAng and ust view ata-pci.c.
(BThen I found one question in the source code.
(B
(Bata-pci.c 462 line.
(BDEVMETHOD(device_detach,ata_pci_attach),
(B
(BIs this right?
(BI think, it should be use "ata_pci_dettach" or so
It seems Hiroyuki Aizu wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was update 5-current and begin using with ATAng and ust view ata-pci.c.
> Then I found one question in the source code.
>
> ata-pci.c 462 line.
> DEVMETHOD(device_detach,ata_pci_attach),
>
> Is this right?
> I think, it should be use
Every time I start up ion-devel I get an xmessage stating:
>> Drawing Engine /usr/X11R6/lib/ion-devel/de.la not registered!
>> Stack trace:
0 [C]: in 'gr_select_engine'
1 /usr/X11R6/etc/ion-devel/draw.lua:6
[Skipping unnamed C function.]
I can click "okay" and everythi
Hi,
I just lost all of my filesystems on my 5.1 box.
I was running mnogosearch's indexer on my website while several errors
occured. I guess there were 320 of these errors, cause the last message
was "last message repeated 320 times". Unfortunately /var is lost as
well, so I don't have more error
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:11 +0200, Thomas Gutzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi,
I just lost all of my filesystems on my 5.1 box.
I was running mnogosearch's indexer on my website while several errors
occured. I guess there were 320 of these errors, cause the last message
was "last message repe
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:11 +0200, Thomas Gutzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> I have lost over 1,000 to 2,000 emails like three times when the Nvidia
> driver crashed and had to do the power off and on to get it boot to let the
> fsck backgroun
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 15:53:26 -0400 (EDT), Andre Guibert de Bruet
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:26:11 +0200, Thomas Gutzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I have lost over 1,000 to 2,000 emails like three times when the Nvidia
driver cr
Brad Knowles wrote:
At 9:40 PM -0700 2003/08/23, Scott M. Likens wrote:
Also please teach your email client to word wrap. That's nasty.
According to your headers, you're using Ximian Evolution 1.4.4.
According to his headers, he's running Mutt/1.5.4i.
You tell me.
When Microsoft s
After I rebooted from a make world, I found that my dvdrom device
now occupies /dev/acd0 instead of /dev/acd1 and my plextor 8/4/32A
is nowhere to be seen. Here's a snippet from my last good boot:
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
ad0: 29314MB [59560/16/63] at ata
On Saturday 23 August 2003 18:03, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Aug 2003, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> > Prior to Thursday, it worked just fine.
>
> I can't explain it. Someone is going to have to debug konsole and
> figure out what is going on.
Done. Turns out this change (
http://www.freebsd.
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:17:52PM +, Jens Rehsack wrote:
> Stuart Walsh wrote:
> >On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> >>On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>I ported the openbsd additions to the sk driver to support the 3c940
On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 03:13:18PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 24, 2003 at 12:35:01PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
> > On Sun Aug 24, 01:22P +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 23, 2003 at 04:45:30PM +0100, Stuart Walsh wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > Unfortunately my Asus P4P800 still l
On Mon, Aug 18, 2003, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> As part of the DragonFly effort we are going to increase the
> mount path limit from 80 chars to 1024.
>
> This will change the statfs structure. I thought I would adopt the
> 64 bit changes that 5.x has made to keep things synchroniz
Problem solved.
I could restore the superblock using:
dd if= skip=32 of= seek=16 bs=512 count=16
Thx to
http://groups.google.de/groups?selm=Pine.BSF.4.21.0212150052530.41793-10_root.org%40ns.sol.net&oe=UTF-8&output=gplain
Cheers,
Tom
___
[EMAIL PR
55 matches
Mail list logo
