On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 12:05:43AM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-05 at 16:16 -0800, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 04:44:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > > On 3/5/10 3:53 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 12:12:02AM -0500, Joe Mar
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 4:10 PM, James R. Van Artsdalen <
james-freebsd-curr...@jrv.org> wrote:
>
> When last I looked openssl did not use /dev/crypt - it's not clear how
> big the benefit would be from doing this if nothing that uses openssl wins.
>
Geli uses the crypto framework.
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> According to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AES-NI , we can get
> specification document: http://software.intel.com/file/20457 .
>
> I saw it, and consider that we can release under BSDL. Because
> of 'from specification'.
That document is short on det
Hi David.
On Sun, 07 Mar 2010 09:59:07 -0800
David Ehrmann wrote:
> I was thinking that if I did do it, I'd start with padlock as a base.
> It looks like there are maybe 6 new opcodes. Maybe we could ask the
> contributor of the Linux code (an Intel employee) if he'd be willing to
> also rel
Doug Hardie wrote:
> On 8 March 2010, at 06:53, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>
>> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail*
>>> with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp",
>>> "upti
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Doug Hardie wrote:
I run a number of 4 core systems with em interfaces. These are production
systems that are unmanned and located a long way from me. Under unusual
conditions it can take up to 6 hours to get there. I have been waiting to
switch to 8.0 because of the di
On 8 March 2010, at 06:53, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
>
>> If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail*
>> with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp",
>> "uptime", and a brief description of the
08.03.2010 13:29, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky пишет:
Hello, all!
Recently I've started to see the following logs in messages:
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Currently unreadable
(pending) sectors
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Offline
uncorrecta
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 04:45:20PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:16:41PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > > Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > > Thanks for the info. Frankly, I have no idea how to explain the
> > > > issue given that you have no heavy lo
Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2010 at 03:08:38PM -0800, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi, Tim--
On Mar 7, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Tim Kientzle wrote:
[ ... ]
Corrupted MAC on input.
Disconnecting: Packet corrupt
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed ... [receiver]
and then the rsync session is dead
On Sun, 7 Mar 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
If your system shows a non-zero value, please send me a *private e-mail*
with the output of that command, plus also the output of "sysctl kern.smp",
"uptime", and a brief description of the workload and network interface
configuration. For example: it
Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:16:41PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> > > Thanks for the info. Frankly, I have no idea how to explain the
> > > issue given that you have no heavy load.
> >
> > How many cores would be involved in handling the traffic and
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 2:07 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Hi Alexander and Hans,
>> I recently did the following which generated a panic on a
>> 9-CURRENT kernel compiled on the 26th:
>>
>> 1. Executed reboot
>> 2. Removed keyboard.
>> 3.
Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:21:44PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
We have this problem from time to time on bunch of machines. As we are
using gmirror, the easiest way is to force re-synchronization (rewrite)
of the whole drive. The problem is
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:58:39AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <20100308125643.1ac0b...@ernst.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn
> writes
> :
> >On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:17:17 +0530
>
> >> I'm trying this one more time, since the issue is still unresolved.
> >>
> >> newfs(8) broke for
On Mon, 08 Mar 2010 11:58:39 +
"Poul-Henning Kamp" wrote:
> In message <20100308125643.1ac0b...@ernst.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn
> writes
> :
> >On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:17:17 +0530
>
> >> I'm trying this one more time, since the issue is still unresolved.
> >>
> >> newfs(8) broke for big
In message <201003080329.o283tqic011...@hergotha.csail.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollma
n writes:
>If we were talking about 100 architectures, I might feel differently,
>but in this universe, we have, what? eight? And there are how many
>architectures currently in mass production? This whole discussion
In article <20100307.144736.420173476735197890@bsdimp.com>, Warner
Losh writes:
>We don't have quite as many problems as the NetBSD/OpenBSD crowd in
>this respect. They tend to define a new MACHIINE more often then we
>have (or will). The need for sys/arch is less severe here than there
>be
In message <20100308125643.1ac0b...@ernst.jennejohn.org>, Gary Jennejohn writes
:
>On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:17:17 +0530
>> I'm trying this one more time, since the issue is still unresolved.
>>
>> newfs(8) broke for big-endian systems since revision 204654. This change
>> made sectorsize variable in
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:17:17 +0530
"Jayachandran C." wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:34:03PM +0530, C. Jayachandran wrote:
> > I'm testing this on the mips platform, but I think there is an issue
> > with change that made sectorsize int64_t, because the ioctl
> > DIOCGSECTORSIZE used to read
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:21:44PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
> We have this problem from time to time on bunch of machines. As we are
> using gmirror, the easiest way is to force re-synchronization (rewrite)
> of the whole drive. The problem is when there are Pen
On Mon, 8 Mar 2010, Miroslav Lachman wrote:
> Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
> > Hello, all!
> >
> > Recently I've started to see the following logs in messages:
> >
> > Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Currently
> > unreadable (pending) sectors
> > Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
Hello, all!
Recently I've started to see the following logs in messages:
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Currently unreadable
(pending) sectors
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Offline
uncorrectable sectors
smart
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:52:43PM +0200, Eugene Dzhurinsky wrote:
> dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null skip=222342559 bs=512 count=1
> dd: /dev/ad4: Input/output error
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
> 0 bytes transferred in 2.351940 secs (0 bytes/sec)
>
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/ad4 seek=222342559 b
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 10:51:22AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> I would suggest you boot single-user and run
>
> mdmfs -s 1m md /tmp
> recoverdisk -w /tmp/_.wl /dev/ad4 /dev/ad4
>
> That will find out how many bad sectors you have and try to recover
> the contents of them if pos
On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 12:31:24PM +0200, Alexander Motin wrote:
> You may try to overwrite these sectors with dd. It should trigger sector
> reallocation. To be sure, you may read them before and after the write.
dd if=/dev/ad4 of=/dev/null skip=222342559 bs=512 count=1
dd: /dev/ad4: Input/output
In message <20100308102918.ga5...@localhost>, Eugeny N Dzhurinsky writes:
>Now can I find out which file owns the LBAs 222342557 and 222342559 ?
>How do I force remapping of these sectors? I assume that I have to write
>something directly to the sectors?
I would suggest you boot single-user and r
Eugeny N Dzhurinsky wrote:
> Recently I've started to see the following logs in messages:
>
> Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Currently
> unreadable (pending) sectors
> Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Offline
> uncorrectable sectors
>
> smar
Hello, all!
Recently I've started to see the following logs in messages:
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Currently unreadable
(pending) sectors
Mar 8 12:00:24 localhost smartd[795]: Device: /dev/ad4, 2 Offline
uncorrectable sectors
smartctl did really show that some
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:34:03PM +0530, C. Jayachandran wrote:
> I'm testing this on the mips platform, but I think there is an issue
> with change that made sectorsize int64_t, because the ioctl
> DIOCGSECTORSIZE used to read sector size seems to take u_int. This
> quick change fixes it for me
30 matches
Mail list logo
