On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 09:59:23PM -0500, Brandon Gooch wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:35 PM, ben wilber wrote:
> > On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> >> > [r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
> >> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> >> > Copyright
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:35 PM, ben wilber wrote:
> On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
>> > [r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
>> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
>> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> > GDB is free software, covered by
Hi jkim.
On Wed, 5 May 2010 13:51:10 -0400
Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > 11 - 0x01 = +10C
> > 11 - 0x18 = -13C
> > 11 - 0x3f = -52C
> > [*] http://support.amd.com/us/Processor_TechDocs/31116.pdf
> AMD keeps flipping the sign from core to core. :-( Please see
> AMDTEMP_FLAG_DO_SIGN for Family 0Fh, for e
2010/5/9 Jeff Roberson :
> On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>> 2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein :
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
>
> This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page,
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:20 PM, b. f. wrote:
> On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
>
> What performance differences, if any
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/8 Ulrich Sp?rlein :
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order re
On 5/8/10, Kip Macy wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Brandon Gooch
> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. wrote:
>>> On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>
>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few da
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Brandon Gooch
wrote:
> On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. wrote:
>> On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
>>> Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
> changes
>
On 08.05.2010 22:30 (UTC+1), Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to h
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 4:20 PM, b. f. wrote:
> On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>>>
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
>
> What performance differences, if any
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on upd
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
>>> changes
>>> are not yet complete.
What performance differences, if any, can we expect on uniprocessors
from the vm page lock-re
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT 2010
r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[r...@test /home/freebsd/sys/module
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 04:11:49PM -0400, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
> > [r...@test ~]# kgdb /boot/kernel/kernel /var/crash/vmcore.1
> > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD]
> > Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
> > welcome
On 05/08/10 13:36, Alan Cox wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of
>>> changes
>>> are not yet complete.
>>>
>>
>> Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
>> d
Doug Barton wrote:
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to have mostly settled dow
On May 8, 2010, at 1:00 PM, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
>
> [r...@test ~]# uname -a
> FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT
> 2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
> [r...@test
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 01:00:32PM -0700, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
>
> [r...@test ~]# uname -a
> FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT
> 2010 r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>
On 05/05/10 11:56, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> I'm afraid that I would advise waiting a few days. This round of changes
> are not yet complete.
Is the coast clear yet? :) I have been holding off on updating -current
due to the SUJ stuff, but that seems to have mostly settled down now, so
I'm hoping that
On Sat, 8 May 2010, Weongyo Jeong wrote:
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
db> bt
Tracing pid 1795 tid 100096 td 0xff0003d8b390
uart_z8530_class() at 0
ifc_simple_create() at ifc_simple_create+0x89
if_clone_createif() at if_clone_createif+0x64
ifioctl() at ifioc
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 10:27:31PM +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2010/5/6 Weongyo Jeong :
> > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:42:16PM +0200, Gustau P?rez wrote:
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>
> >> >> I've been testing the driver for a few time with AMD64/CURRENT. A
> >>
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 06:08:05PM +0200, Gustavo Perez Querol wrote:
>
> >
> > Hello Gustau, I'm so sorry for belated response that I had no time to
> > read and work email and wireless stuffs.
> >
> > Could you please test this symptom with attached patch? It looks in
> > CURRENT it missed to i
Hello,
Anyone encountered this panic on recent CURRENT kernel?
[r...@test ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD test 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #16: Sun May 2 00:24:12 PDT 2010
r...@test:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
[r...@test /home/freebsd/sys/modules/bwn]# ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev bwn0
On 05/08/2010 02:21 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe mailto:j...@hostedcontent.com>> wrote:
On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM
The cable, its a simple thing but make SURE you try that, a slightly
damaged one can do weird things and its quick to check, don't overlook
it.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 10:22 AM, joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
>> I still am not clear on this system, how many ports
On 05/08/2010 01:53 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
I still am not clear on this system, how many ports are on it, and its
an 82576?
Sounds to me like you've proven its not on the box if you can do fine
when its
on its own. So change ports in the switch, as I said, change cables, must be
something in that
2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein :
> On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
>> 2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein :
>> > On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>> >> This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
>> >> new. I do use SUJ.
>> >>
>> >> lo
I still am not clear on this system, how many ports are on it, and its an
82576?
Sounds to me like you've proven its not on the box if you can do fine when
its
on its own. So change ports in the switch, as I said, change cables, must be
something in that environment.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 18:00:50 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2010/5/8 Ulrich Spörlein :
> > On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> >> This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
> >> new. I do use SUJ.
> >>
> >> lock order reversal:
> >> 1st 0xc483
On 05/08/2010 01:31 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it, and try
a back
to back connection with its NICs, change cables, look at BIOS settings,
change
the slot the nic is in... All just off the top of my head.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM
Looks like something to do with system C, you might isolate it, and try a
back
to back connection with its NICs, change cables, look at BIOS settings,
change
the slot the nic is in... All just off the top of my head.
Jack
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 9:41 AM, joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 11:17 AM, Ian
On 05/08/2010 11:17 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or somethi
- jfbterm
- boot splash
- apps that use libvgl (e.g. mplayer)
- other uses for graphic modes
Is there a way to avoid recompiling kernel just to use them?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-curre
On Sat, 08.05.2010 at 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
> new. I do use SUJ.
>
> lock order reversal:
> 1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:502
> 2nd 0xec0fe304 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/u
joe wrote:
> On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> > joe wrote:
> >> I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
> >
> > Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
> > will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
>
> I will grab a ne
On 05/08/2010 06:55 AM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
joe wrote:
I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
I will grab a new nic to
On Fri, 7 May 2010 13:52:15 -0700
Ben Widawsky wrote:
> If a debugger attaches to a suspended process, the process will be
> resumed, and backgrounded. This seems like the incorrect behavior to me
> based what I read in the man page. "The tracing process will see the
> newly-traced process stop a
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between B
joe wrote:
> I have just tried your suggeston and it has no effect for me ;(
Do you have another brand of NIC that you can try? At least that
will isolate whether it's igb(4) or something else.
Ian
--
Ian Freislich
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc48388d8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_lookup.c:502
2nd 0xec0fe304 bufwait (bufwait) @ /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:11363
3rd 0xc49e56b8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/
Hi, just turned on WITNESS as my laptop freezes from time to time and
among the many LORs, here's a new one:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc09f3484 sysctl lock (sysctl lock) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_sysctl.c:1521
2nd 0xc0eed504 ACPI Docking Station (ACPI Docking Station) @
/usr/src/sys/modules/acp
On 05/08/2010 05:54 AM, Fabien Thomas wrote:
Have you tried to disable TSO / LRO?
Fabien
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and one for
the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same switch.
All connections are
On 05/08/2010 05:08 AM, joe wrote:
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network
and one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the
same switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, a
Hello List,
I've installed a testing system with readonly /usr filesystem.
And I was surprised by following weekly report (BTW locate
database rebuilded just fine):
-
Rebuilding whatis database:
makewhatis: /usr/share/man/whatis.tmp: Read-only file system
makewhatis: /usr/share/openssl/man/wha
I have 3 boxes, each with two nics. One nic for the private network and
one for the public network.
The private network is all on the same vlan. All 6 nics are on the same
switch. All connections are 1000tx Full Duplex.
I will call the servers Box A, Box B, and Box C.
When i FTP data between B
45 matches
Mail list logo
