Thanks, this is very useful.
Fabien
Le 11 mai 2010 à 21:31, Alexey Shuvaev a écrit :
Hello!
Just FYI: noticed addition of lzma directory to BSD.include.dist mtree file.
Well, now it seems to work!
/* Test file size 264 MiB */
[wep4035] ~ ll
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:46 AM, Bernd Walter ti...@cicely7.cicely.de wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:15:13PM +0200, Alexander Best wrote:
i've posted a log here which is pretty self explanatory:
http://pastebin.com/tn3NiDDW
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Alexander Best
On Tue, 11 May 2010 20:41:41 +0200
Juergen Lock n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de wrote:
So now I made a patch that allows disabling that KVM hack via device
hints, appended below. (hint.psm.0.flags=0x1 - or do you guys
think the hack should be disabled by default instead?)
Don't change the
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP.
No, it does not. Essentially, it adds one or two function calls per
vop that allocate or deallocate blocks or inodes, and the function
bodies verify
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 02:05:06PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com writes:
Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav d...@des.no writes:
It adds quite a bit of code to pretty much every UFS VOP.
No, it does not. Essentially, it adds one or two function calls per
vop
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org:
On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
new. I do use SUJ.
lock order reversal:
Check to make sure the links are all full-duplex. We started seeing
bad performance with the em(4) driver on our HP Proliant 360DL G5's
using 1000Mbits. It turned out that switch was setting it's port to
half-duplex and the emX interface was following suit.
HTH,
Patrick
joe wrote:
On
Hello!
Just to remind that still:
~ dc -e 6 2 / p
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
This was already mentioned on this list:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-April/016560.html
and there is a patch proposed in the same thread:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org:
On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net wrote:
This LOR also is not yet listed on the LOR page, so I guess it's rather
2010/5/12 Jeff Roberson jrober...@jroberson.net:
On Wed, 12 May 2010, Ulrich Sp?rlein wrote:
On Mon, 10.05.2010 at 22:53:32 +0200, Attilio Rao wrote:
2010/5/10 Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org:
On 2010-May-08 12:20:05 +0200, Ulrich Sp?rlein u...@spoerlein.net
wrote:
This LOR also is not
10 matches
Mail list logo