Hi folks,
I've been booting from NIS off a development machine at work and
I've noticed the following behavior:
1. Booting with nisdomainname, nis_client_enable, nis_client_flags
set at boot makes the machine inaccessible (I have to reboot the
machine, get into singleuser, comment out the v
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 May 2010 23:56:24 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks
> wrote:
>> > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>> >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
>> >> atention to
On Wednesday 26 May 2010 23:56:24 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks
wrote:
> > On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> >> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
> >> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is
> >> en
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
>> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
>> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is
>> enabled?
>>
>> I did some tests and seems that I can do this (logs be
On 5/25/10, Marcelo/Porks wrote:
> Hi! I tested the r208241 and it's seems to be ok but this calls my
> atention to other thing: Could I disable de SU when the SUJ is
> enabled?
>
> I did some tests and seems that I can do this (logs bellow).
>
> But will SUJ work properly with SU disabled?
Hi gu
On 5/26/2010 2:56 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
I'm by no means an expert in this area, but isn't removing the locking
on free a bad thing?
Looking at the code, it seems that vm_page_unwire() only requires the
page to be locked if it is managed. As it was acquired by
contigmalloc, the page should
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Stefan Bethke wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working on updating net/netatalk to version 2.1 (or 2.1.1 when that comes
> out the next couple of days), and I'm wondering what state AppleTalk support
> is in these days. Is anybody still using it, or would now be the time to
> I'm by no means an expert in this area, but isn't removing the locking
> on free a bad thing?
Looking at the code, it seems that vm_page_unwire() only requires the
page to be locked if it is managed. As it was acquired by
contigmalloc, the page should be unmanaged so that should be ok.
I am co
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:41:51PM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> >>Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>
> >>> Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
> >>>broken between r206173 and r208486 (my
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Alan Cox wrote:
> Kostik Belousov wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>>
Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
broken between r206173 and r208486 (my mach
On 5/26/2010 9:51 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
I did a quick glance over the driver, try this:
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/nvidia-vm_page_lock.1.patch
I did not even compiled the patched driver.
Kostik,
Thanks for taking a look at this! I sent the following to Alexey
recently in regard
Kostik Belousov wrote:
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:23:02AM -0500, Alan Cox wrote:
> Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
> >broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
> >at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken as well with the
> >sa
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Just reporting the fact that nvidia-driver 195.22 is horribly
broken between r206173 and r208486 (my machine consistency livelocks
at X11 startup); the latest driver is still broken as well with the
same symptoms. I realize that's a huge revision difference, and I'll
def
AK-san,
Did you test run driver in bridge mode?
I have following setup:
# ifconfig
arge0: flags=8943 metric
0 mtu 1500
options=8
ether 00:15:6d:c1:c7:77
inet 192.168.1.41 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255
media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX )
On Tuesday 25 May 2010 6:04:04 am Ronald van der Pol wrote:
> I am trying to move to current from 8.1-PRERELEASE. After
> buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel and rebooting I get:
>
> panic: lapic_enable_cmc: missing APIC 0
> cpuid = 0
> KDB: enter : panic
Try this patch:
Index: i386/i386/mca.
In article
pluknet writes:
> Just wonder why apic is still commented out in pc98's GENERIC.
> Is there a reason to keep things intact?
> It was inherited from i386 port in time when it was commented out.
Because, most of pc98 does not have APIC. In addition, SMP support on
pc98 is broken.
---
On 25.05.2010 13:21, Kamigishi Rei wrote
> device pf
> device pflog
> device pfsync
> options ALTQ
> options ALTQ_HFSC
> options DEVICE_POLLING
> options MROUTING
>
Tried reproducing with
options KDB
options DDB
options KDB_UNATTENDED
18 matches
Mail list logo
