On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:40:28AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 02:04:37PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 11:25:34AM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 09:42:04AM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:16:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:16:13 -
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:16:32 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:16:32 -
On (08/09/2010 11:25), Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On 08/09/2010, at 3:22, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
Please note that your home directory has to be mounted, I mount it in
/etc/rc.local, but don't add any keys. pam_pefs adds the key. Also note
that it has to be exactly your home directory (/home/gleb
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 03:55, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB ---
On Tuesday, September 07, 2010 11:52:36 am Marcin Cieslak wrote:
Dnia 27.08.2010 John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org napisał/a:
On Thursday, August 26, 2010 8:50:01 pm Xin LI wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch changes FreeBSD/x86 back to FreeBSD/i386 on i386 and
FreeBSD/amd64 on amd64.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:55:14AM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 03:55, FreeBSD Tinderbox tinder...@freebsd.org wrote:
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:15:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
At 09:07 AM 9/8/2010, Denny Lin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:55:14AM -0700, Rob Farmer wrote:
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:16:32 - /usr/bin/csup
-z -r 3 -g -L 1 -h cvsup18.freebsd.org /tinderbox/HEAD/amd64/amd64/supfile
TB --- 2010-09-08 10:55:57 - WARNING:
/usr/bin/csup returned exit code Â
Looking at the uses of kvprintf(9), only [v]sprintf(9) doesn't have a
callback function. It seems a little sketchy to me to be doing unsafe
sprintf in the kernel anyways.
Should we (and by we, I mean me) deprecate sprintf(9) and convert the
existing 1200+ uses to strcpy(9) for fixed strings
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:46:18 +0300
From: Gleb Kurtsou gleb.kurt...@gmail.com
On (07/09/2010 10:57), Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
I would like to ask for feedback on a kernel level stacked cryptographic
filesystem. It has started as Summer Of
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:51:57AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems like a large project, but OTOH sprintf(9) is mighty unsafe in
the kernel. It's disapproved of for user-space as being unsafe for
security reasons as well, but the potential downsides aren't the same,
and we'll
In message aanlktiko1v7ymfkvzkhzdmurcyfq0qbtkpxg=lnbd...@mail.gmail.com, mdf@
FreeBSD.org writes:
It seems like a large project, but OTOH sprintf(9) is mighty unsafe in
the kernel.
Well, it is only unsafe if people used it without knowing what they
are doing, so I think a wholesale automated
In message aanlktin9woqzxmc8u9mwpk3=opty0yzfymta68ayn...@mail.gmail.com, Ryan
Stone writes:
#define bprintf(buf, fmt, ...) \
do { \
assert(snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, fmt,
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 9:15 AM, Rink Springer r...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 08:51:57AM -0700, m...@freebsd.org wrote:
It seems like a large project, but OTOH sprintf(9) is mighty unsafe in
the kernel. It's disapproved of for user-space as being unsafe for
security
#define bprintf(buf, fmt, ...) \
do { \
assert(snprintf(buf, sizeof buf, fmt, __VA_ARGS__) \
sizeof buf); \
hello,
[trying current@ first to get wider audience :)]
so, i have a somewhat silly question about libusbhid. please consider
the following code
hid_data_t d;
hid_item_t h;
for (d = hid_start_parse(desc, 1 hid_input, -1); hid_get_item(d, h) 0; ) {
...
}
hid_end_parse(d);
the idea
Hello,
I have a question about IN_MULTI_LOCK() because it uses MTX_DEF flag
when it's initialized so I always encounters the following LOR
lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable)
1st 0x80d0b560 in_multi_mtx (in_multi_mtx) @ netinet/in_mcast.c:1095
2nd 0xff00014e3850
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:33 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:33 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:01:13 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:01:13 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 02:00:00 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:04:37 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:04:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:04:37 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:05:20 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:05:20 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:49:52 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:49:52 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:49:52 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:17 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:17 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:29 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:29 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:29 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:51:47 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:51:47 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:19 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:50:19 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:51:22 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 03:51:22 -
TB --- 2010-09-09 04:32:25 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-09-09 04:32:25 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2010-09-09 04:32:25 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 04:33:03 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2010-09-09 04:33:03 -
26 matches
Mail list logo
