On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
> you think so? judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact
> imo.
On Linux. Have you ever seen those sorts of UI problems on FreeBSD? I don't
watch much video on my systems, but I haven't seen that. FreeBSD has a
On Nov 18, 2010, at 18:43, Julian Elischer wrote:
we are part of the way there..
at least we did abstract the scheduler to the point where we have
two completely different ones. you are welcome to develop a
'framework as you describe and plug it into the abstraction we
already have.
It
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:19:06PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Loading if_bfe module after boot hangs machine, it works/attach fine
>> > from loader.
>> >
>> > Tell
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 09:19:06PM -0700, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 5:40 PM, Paul B Mahol wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Loading if_bfe module after boot hangs machine, it works/attach fine
> > from loader.
> >
> > Tell me if you need bt.
>
> Yes, I want to see the back trace.
I th
On 11/18/10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Paul B Mahol wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> It appears we do not log such events anymore (at least with wlan
>> devices) in console.
>>
>> I set this sysctl to 0 via sysctl.conf, if I set it to 1, nothing will
>> change.
>>
>> Because I had loging disa
On Thu Nov 18 10, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> >On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> >>On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev
> >>wrote:
> >>>On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> >>>Alexander Best wrote:
> >>>
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matth
On 11/18/10 3:37 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard t
On Fri Nov 19 10, Daniel Nebdal wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> > Alexander Best wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> >> > Alexa
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Steve Kargl
wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>>
>> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
>> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>>
>
> It is trivial to bring ULE to its k
hi there,
vfs_mountroot_try() seems to have been removed, yet the src still contains
three references to it:
vfs_mount.c:386
vfs_mount.c:723
freebsd32_misc.c:2368
cheers.
alex
--
a13x
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:59:43PM +, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> well i did exactly what they did in the video. watch a 1080p video and move
> the output window around while compiling the kernel.
>
It is trivial to bring ULE to its knees. If you
have N cores then all you need is N+1 cpu int
On Thu Nov 18 10, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
> > On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > > >
> > > > judging from th
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
> Alexander Best wrote:
>
>> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> > >
>> > > judgi
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:56:35 +
Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> > Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> > >
> > > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
> >
>
On 11/18/2010 11:09 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I am trying to solicit some architectural/design ideas for implementing logic
> that
> would honor ACPI _PSD/_CSD/_TSD descriptions of processor dependency domains.
> Well, I am primarily interested in _PSD, but I think that some general
> principles
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" a écrit
> On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> > "Bjoern A. Zeeb" a écrit
> >
> >> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> >>> As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
> >>>
> >>> This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers th
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:30:13 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 11/17/10 12:15 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>>
>> Probably not. I thought about it a bit more and realized that you will
>> miss state of cpu registers which is rather important.
>>
>> How does debugging over firewire work if it only h
On 11/18/10 19:55, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP an
On 11/18/10 19:28, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's
I have an IPMI-enabled server with BMC watchdog, and if I understand it
correctly, /dev/fido will be attached as the result of loading ipmi.ko.
Is there some easy way to test if everything works?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" a écrit
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the
bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
the o
"Bjoern A. Zeeb" a écrit
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
> > As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
> >
> > This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the
> > bug on a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
> >
> > the obvious problem line is :
On 11/18/10 10:55 AM, Lucius Windschuh wrote:
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon:
[Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
pattern
and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
>> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>> >
>> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>>
>> Well, my
On Nov 18, 2010, at 10:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
>>> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www
2010/11/18 Andriy Gapon :
> [Grouping of processes into TTY groups]
>
> Well, I think that those improvements apply only to a very specific usage
> pattern
> and are greatly over-hyped.
But there are serious issue if you use FreeBSD as a desktop OS with
SMP and SCHED_ULE, or?
Because currently, m
On Tue Nov 16 10, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
>
> On 15 Nov 2010, at 22:19, Alexander Best wrote:
>
> > thanks for all your help. i've recently switched to chromium 6.0.472.63
> > and so far my computer has been very stable.
> >
> > if i experience more lock ups i'll let you know and try to figur
I am trying to solicit some architectural/design ideas for implementing logic
that
would honor ACPI _PSD/_CSD/_TSD descriptions of processor dependency domains.
Well, I am primarily interested in _PSD, but I think that some general
principles
could be shared.
In simple terms.
Currently we do on
On Thu Nov 18 10, Rob Farmer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> > Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
> > addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
> > nominally supposed to be the real content. That doe
On Nov 17, 2010, at 4:10 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> Hi Marcel,
>Do you have any examples that use nfs rootfs's out of the box that
> work with the new logic that don't involve creating an mfsroot? I keep
> on running into this error with vfs.root.mountfrom=nfs (previously on
> CURRENT it w
On Thu Nov 18 10, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
> Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
>
> Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
>
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 06:23:24PM + I heard the voice of
Alexander Best, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> judging from the videos the changes are having a huge impact imo.
Well, my (admittedly limited, and certainly anecdotal) experience is
that Linux's interactive response when under heavy load w
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 10:39, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Frankly, I'm also turned off by the attempt to popup a full page ad in
> addition to the rest of the advertising content which surrounds what is
> nominally supposed to be the real content. That doesn't mean there is
> anything wrong with th
On Thu Nov 18 10, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> > On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
> >> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
> >> This one's from Linux.
> >>
> >> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_vide
On Nov 18, 2010, at 07:32 , Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/11/2010 05:53 George Neville-Neil said the following:
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 09:37 , Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Many modern processors provide APERF and MPERF MSRs which allow to easily
>>> and
>>> reliable calculate average CPU p
on 18/11/2010 15:38 Daniel Nebdal said the following:
> Just for the sake of gathering information here:
> What they offer are two (64-bit, wrapping) counters; one that
> increases at a constant rate, and one that increases in proportion to
> the current performance of the CPU, so that APERF/MPERF
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 18/11/2010 05:53 George Neville-Neil said the following:
>>
>> On Nov 16, 2010, at 09:37 , Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Many modern processors provide APERF and MPERF MSRs which allow to easily
>>> and
>>> reliable calculate average CPU
on 18/11/2010 13:04 O. Hartmann said the following:
> On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
>> Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
>> This one's from Linux.
>>
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
>
> Well,
> it would be nice to have thos
on 18/11/2010 00:41 Li, Qing said the following:
> Building kernel on 8.1-RELEASE should not require a buildworld, right ?
>
> Or there have been changes committed since that would mandate a
> buildworld?
See UPDATING entry 20100915 (for head).
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--
Andriy Gapon
_
on 18/11/2010 05:53 George Neville-Neil said the following:
>
> On Nov 16, 2010, at 09:37 , Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>>
>> Many modern processors provide APERF and MPERF MSRs which allow to easily and
>> reliable calculate average CPU performance level over some interval of time.
>> This also allows
On 11/18/10 02:30, grarpamp wrote:
Just documenting regarding interactive performance things.
This one's from Linux.
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2637_video&num=1
Well,
it would be nice to have those improvements in FreeBSD, but I doubt this
will make it in due tim
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
As promised, here are the full logs (in attachment)
This is a serial console log showing the command loop that triggers the bug on
a debug kernel and ensuing DDB session.
the obvious problem line is :
routetbl 2684 303890K
42 matches
Mail list logo
