Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

2010-11-21 Thread Matthew Seaman
On 21/11/2010 23:16, army.of.root wrote: > On 10\11\19 19:54, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> On Tuesday 16 November 2010 03:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >>> On Monday 15 November 2010 08:36 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Often times I hear complaints like "my Mac hangs after upgrading to 8.1" or "snapshot CD

Re: Broadcom BCM4310 USB Controller (Wifi)

2010-11-21 Thread Alberto Villa
On Wednesday 17 November 2010 10:57:34 Paul B Mahol wrote: > Please use ndis5 branch. master branch is in heavy development. > CURRENT branch just blindly (and badly) track code on FreeBSD CURRENT. ok. unfortunately in this test i made an error and just saw that... `--> git status # On branch ndi

40 vs 44 bit memory addressing HP DL580/980

2010-11-21 Thread Sean Bruno
Looks like these HP boxes have the capability to do 44 bit memory addressing if configured to do so from the BIOS. Is anyone interested in any data from that setting? Sean ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-21 Thread Doug Barton
As far as I can tell the current state of the code builds just fine, so I'm wondering what the current problem with the tinderbox is. Doug On 11/21/2010 15:51, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 -

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:12 - /usr/bin/c

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

2010-11-21 Thread army.of.root
On 10\11\19 19:54, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Tuesday 16 November 2010 03:30 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Monday 15 November 2010 08:36 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: Often times I hear complaints like "my Mac hangs after upgrading to 8.1" or "snapshot CD hangs on my brand new Mac". I know some of these compl

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/22/10 00:28, Paul B Mahol wrote: Find way to reproduce it 100%. The way I described it can be used to reproduce the problem 100%. Detailed instructions for a test case would be something like this: 0) configure a system with tmpfs for /tmp 1) install PostgreSQL 9.0, use a ZFS file sys

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 11/21/10 23:19, Eir Nym wrote: >> >> On 22 November 2010 01:00, Eir Nym  wrote: >>> >>> On 22 November 2010 00:47, Bruce Cran  wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:43:03 +0300 Eir Nym  wrote: > Which type of MFS do you use?

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:11 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 22:05:11 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/21/10 23:19, Eir Nym wrote: On 22 November 2010 01:00, Eir Nym wrote: On 22 November 2010 00:47, Bruce Cran wrote: On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:43:03 +0300 Eir Nym wrote: Which type of MFS do you use? I think you shold use "swap-backed" for your /tmp, not "malloc-based". Last type is only

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Eir Nym
On 22 November 2010 01:00, Eir Nym wrote: > On 22 November 2010 00:47, Bruce Cran wrote: >> On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:43:03 +0300 >> Eir Nym wrote: >> >>> Which type of MFS do you use? I think you shold use "swap-backed" for >>> your /tmp, not "malloc-based". Last type is only for in-kernel file >>

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 21:08:40 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 21:08:40 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-21 21:08:40 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 21:08:50 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 21:08:50 - /usr/b

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Eir Nym
On 22 November 2010 00:47, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:43:03 +0300 > Eir Nym wrote: > >> Which type of MFS do you use? I think you shold use "swap-backed" for >> your /tmp, not "malloc-based". Last type is only for in-kernel file >> system. > > It's tmpfs(5), not md(4). > ah, sorr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:26 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:26 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:26 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:37 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:37 - /usr

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Bruce Cran
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 00:43:03 +0300 Eir Nym wrote: > Which type of MFS do you use? I think you shold use "swap-backed" for > your /tmp, not "malloc-based". Last type is only for in-kernel file > system. It's tmpfs(5), not md(4). -- Bruce Cran ___ free

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Alan Cox
Sean Bruno wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic2.png Trying to get the HP DL980 online today and I see the following panic on startup from the installer CD that I created from -CURRE

Re: tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Eir Nym
On 22 November 2010 00:22, Ivan Voras wrote: > I got a curious error today while starting PostgreSQL, complaining about > "out of space" errno while creating lock file on /tmp. > > /tmp on this machine is mounted as tmpfs and indeed, here is the statistic: > > biggie:/# df -i > Filesystem    1M-bl

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 20:42:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 20:42:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-21 20:42:32 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:42:43 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:42:43 - /usr

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Ivan Voras
On 11/21/10 20:26, Alan Cox wrote: Sean Bruno wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic2.png Trying to get the HP DL980 online today and I see the following panic on startup from the ins

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 20:20:53 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 20:20:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 20:20:53 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:21:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:21:02 - /u

tmpfs out of space (ZFS related?)

2010-11-21 Thread Ivan Voras
I got a curious error today while starting PostgreSQL, complaining about "out of space" errno while creating lock file on /tmp. /tmp on this machine is mounted as tmpfs and indeed, here is the statistic: biggie:/# df -i Filesystem1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity iused ifree %iused Mount

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 11:26 -0800, Alan Cox wrote: > Sean Bruno wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png > > http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic2.png > > > > > > Trying to get the HP DL980 online today and I see the fo

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 17:12:44 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 17:12:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-21 17:12:44 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 17:12:54 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 17:12:54 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 19:26:14 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 19:26:14 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-11-21 19:26:14 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 19:26:23 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 19:26:23 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 20:15:57 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 20:15:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-11-21 20:15:57 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:07 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 20:16:07 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:12 - /usr/bin/c

Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware

2010-11-21 Thread Ryszard Czekaj
> Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 14:32:34 +0100 > From: RM > Subject: Re: [Call for Tests] PAT issue on Apple hardware > To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"; format=flowed; > delsp=yes > > On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:54:21 +0100,

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:11 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 18:35:11 - /usr/bin/csu

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Sean Bruno
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 10:20 -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Any way to restrict the mem available with hints to find out where the > cutoff point is? > Perhaps hw.physmem ... I'll give it try. Sean ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Nov 21, 2010, at 10:20 AM, Matthew Jacob wrote: > Any way to restrict the mem available with hints to find out where the cutoff > point is? > > On 11/21/2010 9:03 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png >> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png >>

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 17:38:11 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 17:38:11 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-21 17:38:11 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 17:38:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 17:38:20 - /usr/b

Re: 256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Matthew Jacob
Any way to restrict the mem available with hints to find out where the cutoff point is? On 11/21/2010 9:03 AM, Sean Bruno wrote: http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic2.png Trying to get th

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:50 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:50 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:59 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:59 - /usr

256G Ram Panic

2010-11-21 Thread Sean Bruno
http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_SMAP.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic1.png http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/256G_panic2.png Trying to get the HP DL980 online today and I see the following panic on startup from the installer CD that I created from -CURRENT. Sean _

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 16:52:22 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 16:52:22 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 16:52:22 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:52:32 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:52:32 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:32 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:32 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:40 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 16:45:40 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:29 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:29 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:34 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:34 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 15:56:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 15:56:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2010-11-21 15:56:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:56:20 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:56:20 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 13:53:47 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 13:53:47 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2010-11-21 13:53:47 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:54:04 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:54:04 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:31 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:31 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:19 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 15:05:19 - /usr/bin/csu

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 13:25:08 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 13:25:08 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 13:25:08 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:25:29 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:25:29 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 14:04:16 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 14:04:16 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v TB --- 2010-11-21 14:04:16 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 14:04:29 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 14:04:29 - /usr/b

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 13:45:13 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 13:45:13 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-11-21 13:45:13 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:45:38 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:45:38 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on mips/mips

2010-11-21 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2010-11-21 13:10:37 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-11-21 13:10:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips TB --- 2010-11-21 13:10:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:10:47 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2010-11-21 13:10:47 - /usr/bin/c

Re: net.link.log_link_state_change broken?

2010-11-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 11/21/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/19/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> On 11/18/10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Paul B Mahol wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> It appears we do not log such events anymore (at least with wlan devices) in console. I set this sysctl to 0 v

Re: net.link.log_link_state_change broken?

2010-11-21 Thread Paul B Mahol
On 11/19/10, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On 11/18/10, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> On Tue, 2 Nov 2010, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> It appears we do not log such events anymore (at least with wlan >>> devices) in console. >>> >>> I set this sysctl to 0 via sysctl.conf, if I set it to 1, nothing wil