On Friday 29 April 2011 07:59:39 Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I intend to commit the following change soon and MFC it after a short
> period of time. Please test it if you use multimedia applications, both
> native and Linux, especially if they deal with audio recording/capture.
>
> Thank you.
Seems to
TB --- 2011-04-29 05:10:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 05:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-29 05:10:00 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 05:10:09 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 05:10:09 - /usr/bin/csu
I intend to commit the following change soon and MFC it after a short period of
time. Please test it if you use multimedia applications, both native and Linux,
especially if they deal with audio recording/capture.
Thank you.
Original Message
Message-ID: <4db6f7ba.4070...@freeb
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:06 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:06 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:06 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:24 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:24 - /u
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:34:32 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:34:32 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sun4v
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:34:32 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:34:42 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:34:42 - /usr/b
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:53 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:20:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:21:04 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 03:21:04 - /usr
Andrey,
Great work, thank you. I have a little destraught about this over the
years since its inception with having just a label class for itself. Now
that this has all be properly tested it seems like a good idea to me to
split them up into their respective sections as you have done.
Now with t
TB --- 2011-04-29 02:38:40 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 02:38:40 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-29 02:38:40 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 02:38:48 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 02:38:48 - /usr/bin/c
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:11 AM, Colin Mitchell
wrote:
> Anyways, I bought a new lower-end computer that I was hoping to replace
> both with. It is a dirt-cheap dual-core AMD that I had built for
> $175US. It came with a 500GB HDD, and I would like to get another one
> to put in it. Now, I woul
TB --- 2011-04-29 01:02:48 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 01:02:48 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64
TB --- 2011-04-29 01:02:48 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 01:02:59 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 01:02:59 - /usr/bin/c
Hello, BSDians.
I am kind of a n00b to FreeBSD but have had great success and fun with
it so far.
I have two old Dell servers at home. One has Ubuntu server and is my
web and mail server. The other is FreeBSD, and I run servers for a
video game on it. I really like the FreeBSD server, especial
TB --- 2011-04-29 00:10:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-29 00:10:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-29 00:10:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 00:10:11 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-29 00:10:11 - /usr/bin/csu
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 07:39:17PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Is there any impact on /usr/sbin/amd?
> > >
> > I'll admit I haven't tested it (I've never used the FreeBSD amd). I
> > will
> > do so once I figure out how to set it up, but I'm hoping others will
> > report
> >
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:10:05 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:10:05 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:10:05 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:10:12 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 21:10:12 - /usr/bin/c
TB --- 2011-04-28 18:30:01 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 18:30:01 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for arm/arm
TB --- 2011-04-28 18:30:01 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 18:30:10 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 18:30:10 - /usr/bin/csu
TB --- 2011-04-28 15:26:41 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-04-28 15:26:41 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for mips/mips
TB --- 2011-04-28 15:26:41 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 15:26:49 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-04-28 15:26:49 - /usr/bin/c
Quoting David Schultz (from Tue, 26 Apr 2011
11:46:45 -0400):
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010, Rui Paulo wrote:
Hi,
I've been chatting with the ICC ex-users and they seem to be ok
with the removal of the ICC bits from share/mk and other places.
The reason is that it doesn't work and no one has volunt
Julian Elischer wrote:
>> Doug Barton wrote:
>> No problem, just let's hunt things down. I'll wait for that larger post.
>> In meantime, if it is related to eventtimers, it would be good to
>> collect more detailed information. You could try to make timer run
>> during idle (kern.eventtimer.idletic
Doug Barton wrote:
No problem, just let's hunt things down. I'll wait for that larger post.
In meantime, if it is related to eventtimers, it would be good to
collect more detailed information. You could try to make timer run
during idle (kern.eventtimer.idletick). You could try to switch timer
fro
El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 08:43:54PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe escribió:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > El día Tuesday, April 26, 2011 a las 01:51:55PM -0400, Arnaud Lacombe
> > escribió:
> >
> >> >> Then you can go to gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla and file a
20 matches
Mail list logo
