On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hello Kostik,
>
> From: Kostik Belousov
> Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
> > I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change is right.
> > Initially, I thought t
Hello Kostik,
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> Hello Kostik,
>>
>> From: Kostik Belousov
>> Subject: Re: Bug: devfs is sure to have the bug.
>> Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 16:50:44 +0300
>> > I think the problem you described is real, and suggested change is right.
>>
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 06:56:00PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> Hello Kostik,
>
> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> >> But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
> > Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
> > apply rev. 211
Hello Kostik,
>> > On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:41:39AM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>> >> But, now I'm using 8.1-RELEASE. May I have advice about 8.X ?
>> > Do you mean a patch for the stable/8 ? I believe it is enough to
>> > apply rev. 211628 to stable/8, then the patch I posted yesterday
>> > shoul
Hi,
clang gained a new warning for checking the sizeof argument in memset / memcpy
calls, this triggers a couple of times in the FreeBSD tree, here is a brief
summary:
kerberos5/lib/libhx509/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/hx509/cert.c:357:28:
warning: argument to 'sizeof' in 'memset' call is the
I've only seen this on my laptop; my build machine doesn't exhibit the
panic.
r224602 is the most recent point I've built that does not exhibit the
panic at all.
The first few lines (hand-transcribed; I have no serial console on this
laptop -- the one shortcoming it has):
shared lock of (lockmgr
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> ...
> I will see if I can find a commit that affected at least one of the
> affected files in the above list that I can revert to avoid the panic,
> but I'm a bit slow for a while yet, so I figured I'd finally get around
> to postin
On Thursday, August 04, 2011 12:20:47 am Test Rat wrote:
> John Baldwin writes:
>
> > Hmmm, so your BIOS just outright lies then? :(
> >
> > Can you check devinfo -u with 'debug.acpi.disabled=hostres' to see where
> > those memory addresses show up?
Ugh, so ACPI just outright lies it would seem.
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 05:54:54AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I've only seen this on my laptop; my build machine doesn't exhibit the
> panic.
>
> r224602 is the most recent point I've built that does not exhibit the
> panic at all.
>
> The first few lines (hand-transcribed; I have no serial
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 04:59:32PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> ...
> I am sure that this is caused by r224614.
Well, see: you approached it from knowledge, while I made a
quasi-educated guess. :-}
> I forgot that vn_fullpath cannot operate on the locked vnode.
And I expect you have likely fo
Hi folks,
I just noticed cron doesn't work nicely when running a system built
without NIS, since it won't allow you to send emails:
| Aug 4 09:45:00 palm postfix/sendmail[12217]: fatal: www(80): No recipient
addresses found in message header
| Aug 4 10:45:00 palm postfix/sendmail[12827]: fatal
* Ed Schouten , 20110804 19:30:
> But on the other hand, nsswitch.conf says it will default to `nis'
> anyway. So I suspect the lines shouldn't be removed, but changed to
> `files', right? Maybe we should consider modifying the configuration
> file accordingly?
After
Hello Everyone,
The system will successfully boot only if the OS installation is laying on
the second drive or higher (0x81 and more).
Attempting Boot From CD-ROM
Attempting Boot From Hard Drive (C:)
I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
KDB: debugger backends: ddb
KDB: current backend: ddb
Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All
on 04/08/2011 23:34 kirk russell said the following:
> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
Are sure of that?
Searching for word "panic" turns up nothing.
> KDB: debugger backends: ddb
> KDB: current backend: ddb
> Copyright (c) 1992-2011 The FreeBSD Project.
> Cop
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:34 PM, kirk russell wrote:
> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
...
> You have new mail.
> kleenex# uname -a
> FreeBSD kleenex 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0: Thu Jul 28 16:34:16
> UTC 2011 r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/sr
Hi Guys,
I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
server configuration is:
Dell 1950
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
CPU)
4 x CPU
2 NIC ()
I want to reach the high processing of packets per second and use pf as
synproxy an
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 08:39:17PM -0300, Victor Detoni wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I'm trying tunning a FreeBSD 8.2 to high perfomance network with pf. My
> server configuration is:
>
> Dell 1950
> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU5130 @ 2.00GHz (1995.03-MHz K8-class
> CPU)
> 4 x CPU
> 2 NIC ( 1
On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
> Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
> boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
>
> IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
> without any error messages.
A workaround for the hang on boot and "error 1 lba X" failures
hail,
any info on what port multiplier I could buy to make the 4 port Sil3124 at
least make up to 8 ?
will make that much difference if I run stable ? (by what I see 9.0
schedule, that may be the version I'll run)
thanks,
matheus
--
We will call you cygnus,
The God of balance you shall be
A:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:56 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:34 PM, kirk russell wrote:
>> I tried out the i386 9 Beta this week. I get a panic when I reboot.
>
>
> This is a well documented WITNESS LOR.
Sorry for the noise. I didn't take the time to review the code first.
Pawel Worach writes:
> On Aug 1, 2011, at 14:24, Test Rat wrote:
>
>> Anyone else? I can still reproduce with trunk r136607.
>> boot and gptboot seem to be unaffected.
>>
>> IIRC, with previous clang import it just stuck during boot
>> without any error messages.
>
> A workaround for the hang on
Hello, Andriy.
You wrote 3 августа 2011 г., 16:36:32:
> Just in case, signal 4 is SIGILL, an illegal instruction.
> Maybe you are installing world that is built for a higher class CPU.
> Or perhaps a miscompilation by clang.
> Just hypothesizing out loud.
It seems to be miscompilation (as Soekri
Hi all,
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
them into /etc/resolv.conf using the resolvconf script.
The script anyhow ove
On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
> and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
> running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
> them into /etc/resolv.conf usi
25 matches
Mail list logo
