Re: graid fresh install

Mike Tancsa wrote: > On 8/5/2011 12:01 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> and mount it. However, speeds seem a bit slow, but I am not sure if >> thats to be expected. >> >> i5# dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test bs=1024k count=100 >> 100+0 records in >> 100+0 records out >> 104857600 bytes transferred in 13.99608

issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

hi there, i'm running HEAD on amd64 with bsdgrep (WITH_BSD_GREP=true). i noticed the lang/go port won't build due to errors caused by egrep. this might be a ports issue, but to me it rather looks like bsdgrep is not behaving exactly the same, as gnu grep. however i haven't tried building the port

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

Alexander Best writes: [...] > gmake -C 6g install > gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/src/cmd/6g' > quietgcc -I"/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/include" -ggdb -O2 -c > "/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/src/cmd/6g/list.c" > egrep: : error: .Each undeclared

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

On Tue Aug 9 11, Test Rat wrote: > Alexander Best writes: > > [...] > > gmake -C 6g install > > gmake[1]: Entering directory > > `/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/src/cmd/6g' > > quietgcc -I"/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/include" -ggdb -O2 -c > > "/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/s

uma_zalloc_arg complains about, non-sleepable locks held in pf

Hello, I just updated my server to the latest current, and on boot the following below is spammed 14 times on my console. FreeBSD foo 9.0-BETA1 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA1 #0 r224719: Mon Aug 8 22:49:44 CEST 2011 foo:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 -Koop uma_zalloc_arg: zone "pfiaddrpl" with th

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

Alexander Best writes: > On Tue Aug 9 11, Test Rat wrote: >> Alexander Best writes: >> >> [...] >> > gmake -C 6g install >> > gmake[1]: Entering directory >> > `/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/src/cmd/6g' >> > quietgcc -I"/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/include" -ggdb -O2 -c >> > "/u

[bsdgrep] --exclude-dir doesn't work

It seems fnmatch(3) args were accidentally swapped. Try $ bsdgrep -Fr --exclude-dir '*.svn*' grep_ usr.bin/grep | bsdgrep -c svn 72 %% Index: usr.bin/grep/util.c === --- usr.bin/grep/util.c (revision 224705) +++ usr.bin/grep/util

Re: libdialog strangeness after source upgrade to head/9.0BETA1

On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote: I think this behavior (already in several Linux distros) is really far more intuitive that the old FreeBSD version, but it is a bit disconcerting at first. It really does not take much to get used to and I think anyone who is either new to Unix or familia

Re: [patch] Problem with two NIC on same NET (in_scrubprefix: err=17, new prefix add failed)

Hi, after more testing of all matter related to two NIC on same net, I just updated my submit http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=159601 The patch I send here yesterday must be updated too. IFA_RTSELF flag must be treat correctly on more places. The new patch is attached and commented ou

reconfiguring wifi after of installed FreeBSD 9 beta 1

How do I run the command again wifi network configuration that runs on FreeBSD installation 9 beta 1? Regards, Sylvio ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail t

Re: 9.0-BETA1 installer issues

On 06/08/2011 17:05, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 06/08/2011 15:48, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> On 08/05/11 10:58, Lars Engels wrote: >>> On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:03:22PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:28:34PM +0200, Marc Fonvieille wrote: > > [...] >

Re: reconfiguring wifi after of installed FreeBSD 9 beta 1

Hi, Is a command that run in install of FreeBSD 9 beta 1. Which command or script? Em 9 de agosto de 2011 12:06, Antonio Olivares escreveu: >> How do I run the command again wifi network configuration that runs on >> FreeBSD installation 9 beta 1? >> >> > > Which command? > > There might b

Re: issues with bsdgrep and lang/go

On Tue Aug 9 11, Test Rat wrote: > Alexander Best writes: > > > On Tue Aug 9 11, Test Rat wrote: > >> Alexander Best writes: > >> > >> [...] > >> > gmake -C 6g install > >> > gmake[1]: Entering directory > >> > `/usr/ports/lang/go/work/go-20110515/src/cmd/6g' > >> > quietgcc -I"/usr/ports/la

[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64

TB --- 2011-08-09 18:11:19 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 18:11:19 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for sparc64/sparc64 TB --- 2011-08-09 18:11:19 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 18:11:34 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 18:11:34 - /usr

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2011-08-09 18:00:38 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 18:00:38 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-09 18:00:38 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 18:00:59 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 18:00:59 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2011-08-09 17:54:43 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 17:54:43 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-09 17:54:43 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 17:55:02 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 17:55:02 - /usr

[patch] fix duplicate case value in ichsmb_pci.c

Hi, clang trunk has yet another nice error (in this case harmless): dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c:183:7: error: duplicate case value '590381190' case ID_DH89XXCC: ^ dev/ichsmb/ichsmb_pci.c:85:23: note: expanded from: #define ID_DH89XXCC 0x23308086

Re: libdialog strangeness after source upgrade to head/9.0BETA1

On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 08:31:13AM -0600, Warren Block wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > >I think this behavior (already in several Linux distros) is really far more > >intuitive that the old FreeBSD version, but it is a bit disconcerting at > >first. It really does not take mu

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:46 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:46 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:45 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 19:50:45 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

TB --- 2011-08-09 21:41:40 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 21:41:40 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for ia64/ia64 TB --- 2011-08-09 21:41:40 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 21:42:00 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 21:42:00 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

TB --- 2011-08-09 22:34:49 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 22:34:49 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-09 22:34:49 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 22:35:06 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 22:35:06 - /u

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

TB --- 2011-08-09 22:28:37 - tinderbox 2.7 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-08-09 22:28:37 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2011-08-09 22:28:37 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2011-08-09 22:28:52 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2011-08-09 22:28:52 - /usr

Re: ghost files

On 08/08/11 10:21, C. P. Ghost wrote: On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Super Biscuit wrote: I suggest sprinkling holy water on your computer and then hitting a bong. Who you gonna call :P? -Garrett (I couldn't resist) http://www.gnu.org/f