Hi,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>>
>> I think that using the FEATURE() macro and feature_present(3) might be
>> more appropriate for this.
>>
>> Thanks.
>> --
>> Jaakko
>>
>
> Oh, OK. I was unfamiliar with the
On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 1:15 AM, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
>
> I think that using the FEATURE() macro and feature_present(3) might be
> more appropriate for this.
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Jaakko
>
Oh, OK. I was unfamiliar with these API's because they are new in FreeBSD 8. :)
How about the attached patch
On 9/29/11, Greg Miller wrote:
> On 9/28/11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> On 29 September 2011 08:57, Greg Miller wrote:
>>> On a fresh install of 9.0B2, I've updated my source to RELENG_9 with
>>> csup, and I get the following when I try to make buildworld:
>>
>> Good, is this reproducable? There's a
On 9/28/11, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 29 September 2011 08:57, Greg Miller wrote:
>> On a fresh install of 9.0B2, I've updated my source to RELENG_9 with
>> csup, and I get the following when I try to make buildworld:
>
> Good, is this reproducable? There's a patch to csup that may help you
> out
Is there an upper limit on a transmit packet size, which has CSUM_TSO bit set
in the mp->m_pkthdr.csum_flags field. Browsing the code I thought it was 65535
bytes. However at least on Freebsd 7.x, I am occasionally noticing that the
driver is asked to transmit packets which are 65536 and 65537 b
2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
>> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
>> >> Hello!
>> >>
>> >> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225827) and now reb
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225827) and now rebuilding all my 1215 ports
>> (I've upgraded from 8.2). I'm getting panic. Is it known
>> problem/already fixed so
sorry, I miss a check, here is the patch
.
diff --git a/sys/kern/kern_ctf.c b/sys/kern/kern_ctf.c
index 758ad81..6beefcc 100644
--- a/sys/kern/kern_ctf.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_ctf.c
@@ -164,8 +164,14 @@ link_e
On 29 September 2011 19:58, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> Would you mind getting a log of the numbers given to you after
>> 'hardware error; resetting' ? please?
>
> I don't remember. But I can go back to 8.2 RELEASE and get it.
I'd appreciate it if you could, please.
Thanks,
Adrian
_
2011/9/29 Adrian Chadd
> Hi!
>
> So you're saying that my code behaves better? :-)
>
Yes, I am! =)
> Would you mind getting a log of the numbers given to you after
> 'hardware error; resetting' ? please?
I don't remember. But I can go back to 8.2 RELEASE and get it.
>
>
> Adrian
>
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 04:12:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:51:53PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> >> On Thu, Sep 2
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:51:53PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> 2011/9/29 Kostik Belousov :
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kov
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 03:47:19PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> >> Hello!
> >>
> >> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225827) and now rebuilding all my 1215 ports
> >> (I'v
In 8-stable, WITH_CTF=1 configure item is enabled in command line, not in
make.conf, so when I build kernel module out of /usr/src source tree, such
as x11/nvidia-driver, I forgot to use WITH_CTF=1 and nvidia.ko was built
without .SUNW_ctf section. However, when I run:
#dtrace -lv
trigger the
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0300, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm running 9.0-BETA3 (r225827) and now rebuilding all my 1215 ports
> (I've upgraded from 8.2). I'm getting panic. Is it known
> problem/already fixed somewhere?
>
> FreeBSD mile.xxx.ua 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #
Hi!
So you're saying that my code behaves better? :-)
Would you mind getting a log of the numbers given to you after
'hardware error; resetting' ? please?
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
This night I updated my atom-based home router from "FreeBSD 8.2 RELEASE
amd64" to 10-CURRENT for testing your ath(4) changes.
I use noname chinese card from ebay (Atheros AR5008 802.11n Wireless Mini
PCI-E Card 300Mbps)
# pciconf -lv
ath0@pci0:2:0:0:class=0x028000 card=0x102610e9 chip=0x0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28.09.2011 21:32, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> floating like a dead man in the water. I suspect the
> conversters/libiconv broke something, since it claims it has
> installed libiconv.so.3, but there is never such a shared object
> installed!
Here's what
18 matches
Mail list logo