On 9 October 2011 13:45, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Mostly what I was getting at here was ensuring the first blocks of the
memory stick did not contain actual data. Though, I fear other forces
may be at play here with GPT...
There are.
We've lost this round; let's just throw MBR
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9 October 2011 13:45, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
Mostly what I was getting at here was ensuring the first blocks of the
memory stick did not contain actual data. Though, I fear other forces
may be at play
Hello, Perryh.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 18:00:02:
To install FreeBSD on a gmirrored disk, use MBR (or dangerously
dedicated BSD label) instead of GPT. (This is one reason why
BSD label and MBR should not be considered obsolete.)
MBR doesn't check size of provider on taste. It should be
Hello, Lev.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 11:30:10:
To install FreeBSD on a gmirrored disk, use MBR (or dangerously
dedicated BSD label) instead of GPT. (This is one reason why
BSD label and MBR should not be considered obsolete.)
MBR doesn't check size of provider on taste. It should be
In message 1644928028.20111008143...@serebryakov.spb.ru, Lev Serebryakov writ
es:
Hello, Poul-Henning.
You wrote 8 =EE=EA=F2=FF=E1=F0=FF 2011 =E3., 14:07:29:
It seems, that GPT will be incompatible with any pure-software
mirror or mirror-like RAID.
Unless you do what other implementations
Hello, Poul-Henning.
You wrote 9 октября 2011 г., 11:37:21:
So, every other GEOM class should have special knowledge about GPT?
It doesn't look like topology-agnostic GEOM way :)
That's mostly because GPT by design does not try to play nice.
I understand that... See my proposal in other
On Wed, 5 Oct 2011 19:39:56 -0700 Bob Finch wrote:
BF Attempting to mount a remote SMB share with mount_smbfs fails:
BF freebsd9b3# uname -a
BF FreeBSD freebsd9b3 9.0-BETA3 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 #0: Sat Sep 24 20:46:57 UTC
2011 r...@obrian.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
One issue that has not come up on the emailing list is that dd, designed to
work with memsticks of various capacities, can not make the backup gpt at the
end of the memstick.
Partition is just big enough to hold the data, and I ran out of inodes at times
due to the installer writing to /tmp on
On 9 October 2011 19:54, Thomas Mueller mueller6...@bellsouth.net wrote:
One issue that has not come up on the emailing list is that dd, designed to
work with memsticks of various capacities, can not make the backup gpt at
the end of the memstick.
Partition is just big enough to hold the
On 9 October 2011 13:20, Thomas K. f...@gothschlampen.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 07:28:55PM -0600, Warren Block wrote:
On Sun, 9 Oct 2011, Matt Thyer wrote:
On Oct 9, 2011 11:04 AM, Nathan Whitehorn nwhiteh...@freebsd.org
wrote:
On 10/08/11 19:25, Matt Thyer wrote:
On 9 October 2011 19:10, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
Failure to boot the FreeBSD 9.0-BETA{2|3} memstick images does not indicate
a problem with a PCs BIOS/UEFI as these images are not properly formatted.
Accepted.
If we were able to come up with examples of BIOS/UEFI that cannot
On 9 October 2011 21:44, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 9 October 2011 19:10, Matt Thyer matt.th...@gmail.com wrote:
Failure to boot the FreeBSD 9.0-BETA{2|3} memstick images does not
indicate
a problem with a PCs BIOS/UEFI as these images are not properly
formatted.
Oh, I wasn't suggesting reverting bsdinstall before 9.0. That'll make
it a bit annoying to install on USB flash drives for some devices.
It may be worthwhile to do at a later date though. I do find myself
doing USB 9.0 installs just to test out the release without destroying
a physical disk.
But
Hi,
the subject says it all - does anyone have a step by step howto for
doing userland and kernel dtrace on 9.0?
Thanks,
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe,
Since the change of one of my boxes to FreeBSD 10.0 and some
accindetally build of ports without the suggested settings for UNAME_r
before building ports, I think I've messed up with some ports and need
some advice how to fixate the problem.
Some develish motivation drove me today building
the wiki DTrace (http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace) is available and
enough for being a HOWTO.
2011/10/9 Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org
Hi,
the subject says it all - does anyone have a step by step howto for
doing userland and kernel dtrace on 9.0?
Thanks,
Adrian
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Miroslav.
You wrote 6 октября 2011 г., 16:59:19:
[...]
The current state is simply wrong, because user can do something what
cannot work and is not documented anywhere.
It is Ok in UNIX way, in general. You should be able to shoot your
leg, it is good :)
At 05:23 AM 10/9/2011, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Since the change of one of my boxes to FreeBSD 10.0 and some
accindetally build of ports without the suggested settings for UNAME_r
before building ports, I think I've messed up with some ports and need
some advice how to fixate the problem.
Some
On 10/09/11 11:48, Manfred Antar wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with uname_r
9.0-Current and it went away.
The most recent update to gcc46 also missed the shared library version
bump of
Hi,
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:52 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org said:
dougb In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
dougb because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
dougb there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)
I didn't
I had gotten a PR about sysutils/lsof not compiling with clang. I had
Vic Abell check it out, and the problem is NOT with lsof per se, but
with the system headers.
Is there a project afoot to update the system headers to make them clang
compilable?
Output below.
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away.
Actually, binutils built just fine for me just now
On Sat, October 8, 2011 20:03, Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
The pkg-message tells them to do that.
ops, haven't seen it though. all the ports cleaned by the clean part of
the command got on my way :(
thanks,
On Sat, October 8, 2011 18:28, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:21 PM, Greg Miller greglmil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/8/11, Nenhum_de_Nos math...@eternamente.info wrote:
as recently had issues in this regard, to install it can I just use
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 , then i rebuilt binutils with
uname_r 9.0-Current and it went away.
- Miroslav Lachman's Original Message -
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Miroslav.
You wrote 6 ?? 2011 ??., 16:59:19:
[...]
The current state is simply wrong, because user can do something what
cannot work and is not documented anywhere.
It is Ok in UNIX way, in
On Oct 9, 2011, at 6:18 PM, Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with gcc45 ,
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 18:18:13 -0700
Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
At 11:57 AM 10/9/2011, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 08:48:46 -0700
Manfred Antar n...@pozo.com wrote:
Did you rebuild ports/devel/binutils after change to 10.0 current.
I was having same problem with
28 matches
Mail list logo
