On 10/21/2011 22:42, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried following:
>
> (1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
>
>return status == 0
Return status isn't everything. :)
>prints out "exported"
In my case (1.7) it says "Unversioned directory"
But my point (which perhaps I shoul
Hi,
I tried following:
(1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
return status == 0
prints out "exported"
time:
real0m0.043s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.045s
(2) Run svnversion in svn directory:
return status == 0
prints out "223847M"
time:
real0m2.563s
user0m0.980
TB --- 2011-10-22 04:33:53 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-10-22 04:33:53 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc
TB --- 2011-10-22 04:33:53 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2011-10-22 04:34:06 - cvsupping the source tree
TB --- 2011-10-22 04:34:06 - /usr
On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
> Mattia Rossi wrote
> in <4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au>:
>
> mr> So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing "inet6" to ifconfig
> mr> automatically?
>
> No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed.
That seems redundant, and contra
On 10/21/2011 17:51, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
> Can you come up with a patch which invoke "svn info ." (if the svn
> binary exists)?
> This is slightly faster than svnversion.
>
> If "svn info ." doesn't error out, you can assume that the directory
> is under SVN control.
Doesn't svnversion error o
Hi,
Can you come up with a patch which invoke "svn info ." (if the svn
binary exists)?
This is slightly faster than svnversion.
If "svn info ." doesn't error out, you can assume that the directory
is under SVN control.
--
Craig Rodrigues
rodr...@crodrigues.org
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 2:12 PM, D
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smar
Hi,
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 4:19 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:53:11 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> > Hi folks,
>> >
>> > I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
>> > 10-curren
on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
>>> as test. [...]
>>> It was fre
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:36:05PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the best fix is. One could possibly always run svnversion
> if it exists?
Sure -- and use the result as long as the exit status is 0. (It's
certainly possible that svnversion exists, but the sources in ques
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 7:01:42 pm Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am seeing some strangeness on booting a recent HEAD on an atom machine;
the entire orm0 and related stuff looks wrong. Also some things like a
watchdog driver etc. no longer probe or attach it seems. Anyone an idea?
T
On Thursday, October 20, 2011 8:21:21 am David Wolfskill wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:48:44AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > ...
> > Well, as of subversion-1.7, we don't have a ".svn" directory in
> > ${SYSDIR} any more -- it's only at the root of the working copy
> > (/usr/src, in this c
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But
On Tuesday, October 11, 2011 6:53:11 pm Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've got a machine where ipmi(4) seem to be unable to fully attach.
> > 10-current kernel complains the following way:
> >
> > ipmi0: at iomem 0-0x
Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:56:10PM -0600, Tim Nackos :
> My temporary solution was to use 'pkg_add -r cdparanoia' which worked. That's
> not a fix for the build error however.
>
So, I do have problems using the binary ...see:
# cdparanoia -vsQ
cdparanoia III release 9.8 (March 23, 2001)
Check
On 06/26/11 15:42, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 2011-06-25 17:53, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> On 06/25/11 10:10, Roman Divacky wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 09:57:52AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
Hello.
Just for my couriosity: I'm missing llvm-as, llvm-ld and other
binutils
from LL
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Tim Nackos wrote:
> My temporary solution was to use 'pkg_add -r cdparanoia' which worked. That's
> not a fix for the build error however.
>
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Christian Jachmann wrote:
>
>> Hello my friends.
>>
>> Last two days I switched form
On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
>> as test. [...]
>> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
>> But after reboot m
My temporary solution was to use 'pkg_add -r cdparanoia' which worked. That's
not a fix for the build error however.
On Oct 21, 2011, at 11:52 AM, Christian Jachmann wrote:
> Hello my friends.
>
> Last two days I switched form 8 to 9
>
> following is bad:
>
> ===> Building for cdparanoia
Hello my friends.
Last two days I switched form 8 to 9
following is bad:
===> Building for cdparanoia-3.9.8_9
cd interface && gmake all
gmake[1]: Entering directory
`/usr/ports/audio/cdparanoia/work/cdparanoia-III-alpha9.8/interface'
gmake libcdda_interface.a CFLAGS="-O -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Lars Engels wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:00:47AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>>
>> On 20/10/2011, at 22:21, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
Hi,
I'm facing a kernel panic at vm_page_wire(). Page is locked with
vm_page_lock() yet i get the following panic
panic: mutex page lock not owned at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_page:1845
Code sequence is as below
vm_page_lock(pp);
vm_page_lock_assert(pp, MA_OWNED); /* No panic here */
vm_page_wire(pp); /
Am Thu, 20 Oct 2011 23:40:05 -0700
schrieb Garrett Cooper :
> If I fire up an xterm without setting TERM={ansi,vt100,xterm},
> etc, xterm wraps my command output to 80 columns, even if I resize the
> window to something larger, issue reset (which I thought was supposed
> to fix the console set
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > Bu
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 09:00:47AM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 20/10/2011, at 22:21, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:58:41AM +0100, Tom Evans wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Anton Shterenlikht
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks. Can you also please rem
There are many other compile-with not started with ${NORMAL_C}, your
patch adds
${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} to them too, which could not be suitable for this.
2011/10/19 Ryan Stone :
> I have run into the same issue recently. I have been testing the
> following patch(on 8.2-RELEASE) and it seems to ha
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:52:17AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> # Increased the window size here.
> [gcooper@fallout ~]$ uname -a
> FreeBSD fallout.local 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #1 r226332M:
> Wed Oct 12 22:48:55 PDT 2011
> root@fallout.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FALLOUT amd64
> [gcoop
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But after reboot my server don't boo
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But after reboot my server don't boo
"Daniel O'Connor" writes:
> This is the crunched binary and is pretty big (unlikely to be an issue
> on a modern system though).
>
> You can do..
> cd /usr/src/bin/ls
> make all install
I think you missed the point. Reinstalling ls from broken sources
wasn't going to help. He needed subversion
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> as test. [...]
> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have the same issue on a
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 09:00:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>>> > Hi Garrett,
>>> >
>>> > * Ga
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 09:00:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
>> > Hi Garrett,
>> >
>> > * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 08:40:
>> >> If I fire up
* Garrett Cooper , 20111021 09:00:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> > Hi Garrett,
> >
> > * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 08:40:
> >> If I fire up an xterm without setting TERM={ansi,vt100,xterm},
> >> [...]
> >
> > So
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:59 PM, Ed Schouten wrote:
> Hi Garrett,
>
> * Garrett Cooper , 20111021 08:40:
>> If I fire up an xterm without setting TERM={ansi,vt100,xterm},
>> [...]
>
> So what's the idea behind this? Why not just set TERM properly?
It is s
Hi Garrett,
* Garrett Cooper , 20111021 08:40:
> If I fire up an xterm without setting TERM={ansi,vt100,xterm},
> [...]
So what's the idea behind this? Why not just set TERM properly?
--
Ed Schouten
WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgphKqlDvo4XU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
37 matches
Mail list logo
