Re: [PATCH] Detect GNU/kFreeBSD in user-visible kernel headers

2011-11-20 Thread Robert Millan
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more, I argue that we shall not rely on compiler for this at all. Ideally, we should be able to build FreeBSD

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Jason Edwards
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has several bugs: 1) the cursor starts on line 2

Re: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

2011-11-20 Thread Pegasus Mc Cleaft
Hi Nima, I have tried your latest patch against current, but I am having difficulty getting it to work. I was wondering, is this feature limited to SCSI drives? I have been trying it against my SATA drives but it looks like it is failing on issuing a TUR. IE: feathers#

Re: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

2011-11-20 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 20/11/2011 16:54 Pegasus Mc Cleaft said the following: Hi Nima, I have tried your latest patch against current, but I am having difficulty getting it to work. I was wondering, is this feature limited to SCSI drives? I have been trying it against my SATA drives but it looks

Re: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

2011-11-20 Thread Pegasus Mc Cleaft
On Sunday 20 November 2011 15:24:41 Andriy Gapon wrote: I have tried issuing a TUR to all my drives to see if it was controller or drive specific, but all of them return the same error (The drives are Seagate, Hitachi and WD). What am I doing wrong? You are sending SCSI commands to a

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:15:01PM +0100,

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: Please consider: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/mutexfileline2.patch This is now committed as r227758,227759, you can update your patch now. Here is it. diff --git a/sys/vm/vm_page.c

Re: [PATCH] Detect GNU/kFreeBSD in user-visible kernel headers

2011-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more, I argue that we shall not rely on

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 05:37:33PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: Please consider: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/mutexfileline2.patch This is now committed as r227758,227759, you can update your patch

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:02:14PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: +#define        vm_page_lock_assert(m, a)       \ +    vm_page_lock_assert_KBI((m), (a), LOCK_FILE, LOCK_LINE) I think you should put the \ in the last tab and also, for

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
It looks good to me. Attilio 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 07:02:14PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: +#define        vm_page_lock_assert(m, a)       \ +    vm_page_lock_assert_KBI((m), (a), LOCK_FILE,

Acer Aspire Atheros Netbook

2011-11-20 Thread Nenhum_de_Nos
hail, I just installed 9.0 RC2 in Aspire One 751h and the atheros shows in ifconfig: ath0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 2290 ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/11/20 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2011/11/18 Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org: 2011/11/18 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 11:40:28AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/16 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch What do you think about it? This one only changes the KBI ? Note that _sx suffix is not reserved.

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c: http://www.freebsd.org/~attilio/sxfileline.patch What do you think about it? This one only changes the

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up vm_map.c:

Re: vm_page_t related KBI [Was: Re: panic at vm_page_wire with FreeBSD 9.0 Beta 3]

2011-11-20 Thread Attilio Rao
2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:22:38PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: 2011/11/20 Kostik Belousov kostik...@gmail.com: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 08:04:21PM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: This other patch converts sx to a similar interface which cleans up

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Alexander Best
On Sun Nov 20 11, Jason Edwards wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Stefan Bethke s...@lassitu.de wrote: Am 19.11.2011 um 17:29 schrieb Jason Edwards: Dear list, Has anyone noticed the easy editor is quite bugged on 9.0? On console direct access, opening the easy editor has

Re: ee (easy editor) bugged on 9.0?

2011-11-20 Thread Stefan Bethke
Am 20.11.2011 um 14:41 schrieb Jason Edwards: Some of you asked for the environmental settings. Using 'env' the output begins with: -- on console -- TERM=cons25 SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash -- via SSH -- TERM=xterm SHELL=/usr/local/bin/bash Via SSH the ee editor works as it should. On

Re: Adding disk firmware programming capability to camcontrol

2011-11-20 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft k...@mthelicon.com wrote: On Sunday 20 November 2011 15:24:41 Andriy Gapon wrote: I have tried issuing a TUR to all my drives to see if it was controller or drive specific, but all of them return the same error (The drives are Seagate,

The FreeBSD Project in the Google Code-In 2011 contest

2011-11-20 Thread Wojciech A. Koszek
Hello, (cross-posted message; please keep eventual comments on freebsd-hackers@) The FreeBSD project has been accepted to the Google Code-In 2011 contest. http://google-opensource.blogspot.com/2011/11/google-code-in-2011-participating.html We have proposed 50 tasks so far, and more

Re: [PATCH] Detect GNU/kFreeBSD in user-visible kernel headers

2011-11-20 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011, Kostik Belousov wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:40:42PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote: On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 07:56:20PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote: I fully agree with an idea that compiler is not an authorative source of the knowledge of the FreeBSD version. Even more,