Quick! Martinis for all conversation participants, stat!
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 12/01/2011 23:23, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
>> On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>
>>> Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
>>> and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
>>> code when someone
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
> > and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
> > code when someone changes a library and that change causes
>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 08:01:37PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> and last: upgrade flex to the latest upstream version (it will need the m4
> upgrade) while here I'll move back flex to contrib/
> patches can be found there:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/flex-update.diff
Hi Baptiste,
I ca
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
> and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
> code when someone changes a library and that change causes
> a dramatic change in the performance of one's code.
And as Max pointed
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 11:56:31AM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> David,
>
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > > I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 a
Steve,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Steve Kargl <
s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > > I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default.
> Opini
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:41:00PM +0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to
> > invert a 17 year default.
> >
> > I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT.
>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:51:33PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
> > Author: fjoe
> > Date: Tue Nov
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:55 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
If you go with (2) above, we'll still have *tons* of ports that want a
> libreadline, so we'll just end up growing a port of it and we'll wind up
> with a libreadline on the system anyway.
Then you need to define what base system is.
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:51 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
> > Author: fjoe
> > Date: Tue Nov 29
David,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:59 AM, David O'Brien wrote:
> This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
>
> I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
> my system or I don't.
>
What I meant is that this problem is not related to the original quest
On 2 December 2011 09:51, David O'Brien wrote:
> Wow, a single day of discussion in freebsd-current@ was sufficient to
> invert a 17 year default.
>
> I'd like to see the profile libs remain built by default in -CURRENT.
>
> If you like, add it to the list of things to disable on -STABLE creation
Brooks,
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
> What is the value in doing either?
> >
> > libreadline isn't infecting any non-GPL code turning into GPLv2.
> >
> > Some of use have fancy .input files, and quite frankly the vi mode of
> > libedit still doesn't work quite the same as
On 12/1/11 4:42 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch?
I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the
SC
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Matt Mullins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
>> implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but
>> a
>> file's checksum.
>
> You can always use net/rsync, which does by default compare checksums.
sysutil
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:55:37PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> > It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> > after r228114.
> > The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> > 1) just build & li
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 12:02:23PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> It is possible to build and link our in-tree gdb & friends with libedit
> after r228114.
> The remaining question is what to do with libreadline:
> 1) just build & link gdb with libedit
> OR
> 2) re-import libreadline from gdb sources and
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:38:20PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> I would like to disable building profiled libraries by default. Opinions?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:46:17PM +, Max Khon wrote:
> Author: fjoe
> Date: Tue Nov 29 19:46:17 2011
> New Revision: 228143
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/chang
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:46:30PM +0700, Max Khon wrote:
> This is a separate issue that I want to handle separately.
I see no value in handling it separately. I either have a libreadline on
my system or I don't.
Again, "what problem are you trying to solve"?
> The question is what to do with
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:08 PM, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>> I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
>
> I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
> We should reduce the needless diversion betw
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 11:35:50AM -0800, Matt Mullins wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's
> > existance, but a file's checksum.
>
> You can always use net/rsync, which does by default compare checksums.
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:04:08AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> I think this is useful, perhaps send it to harti@ or jilles@ for review?
I'd like to get some NetBSD bmake maintainers POV too.
We should reduce the needless diversion between the two makes.
--
-- David (obr...@freebsd.org)
___
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:59:33PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best wrote:
> > On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best
> >> wrote:
> >> ? ? pmake sucks as far as diagnostic output is concerned when
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/11/2011 02:38 Arnaud Lacombe said the following:
>> you (committers)
>
> I wonder how it would work out if you were made a committer and couldn't say
> "you (committers)" any more... :-)
>
The real question is rather whether or not
On Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:31:18 +0200
George Kontostanos wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
> integrated into kernel:
>
>
> It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
> option ATA_CAM should remai
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 05:20:17PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 06:04:50PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > I wonder why the waiting_threads stuff is needed at all. The cv could
> > > > be woken up unconditionally everytime. What is the reason for the
> > > > cv_wa
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Freddie Cash wrote:
> So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
> about the OP's original request:
> make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
> is used? :)
>
> [Thought I'd bring the thread back aroun
on 01/12/2011 22:53 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Returning to critical_exit, what do you think about the following patch?
>> I guess that it could be committed independently of / before the
>> SCHEDULER_STOPPED thing.
>>
>> comm
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011, George Liaskos wrote:
> Hello
>
> One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended?
>
> [1]
> http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc
This code uses an unportable workaround for a bug that I believe
was fixed in r2
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 3:42:24 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >>
> >> [cc list trimmed]
> >>
> >> on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
> >>> On Friday, Novembe
on 01/12/2011 20:49 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>> [cc list trimmed]
>>
>> on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Bald
Hello
One example is Google's tcmalloc [1], is this behaviour intended?
[1]
http://code.google.com/p/google-perftools/source/browse/trunk/src/maybe_threads.cc
Regards,
George
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> implement a new -N switch or so which isn't based on a file's existance, but a
> file's checksum.
You can always use net/rsync, which does by default compare checksums.
--
Matt Mullins
___
freebsd-
Hi everyone,
>From my understanding as of 20110424 revision device ahci has been
integrated into kernel:
It is possible to load devices ahci, ata, siis and mvs as modules, but
option ATA_CAM should remain in kernel configuration to make ata
module work as CAM driver supporting le
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 10:56 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> to workaround this issue -- or just install all of the include
> Makefiles there, via (cd ~/head/share/mk; make -m `pwd` install)
Thanks amigo.
sean
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Dec 1, 2011, at 10:46 AM, Sean Bruno wrote:
> I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty
> badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes?
>
> [seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make
> ===> firewire (all)
> "/usr/home/seanb/head/sys/modules/firewire/fir
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 11:59:10 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> [cc list trimmed]
>
> on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
> >>> On Thursday, November 17, 2
I've noted that this morning's svn update seems to be breaking pretty
badly. Is this related to the DTRACE conf changes?
[seanb@sbpi386 ~/head/sys/modules/firewire]$ make
===> firewire (all)
"/usr/home/seanb/head/sys/modules/firewire/firewire/../../../conf/kmod.mk",
line 204: Malformed condition
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:54:44PM +0100, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
> > (GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
> > I get these
I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own.
I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/
Last update was 201107
Where do I get the Current snapshot of 10. (Or do I upgrade from 9.0-RC2)?
Thanks
--
Ben Adams
http://www.SpryMed.com/
___
free
Garrett,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> What I really want is this:
> >
> > $ cat Makefile
> > all: foo bar baz yadda
> >
> > foo bar yadda:
> >
> > baz:
> >false
> > $ gmake
> > false
> > gmake: *** [baz] Error 1
> >
> > $ make all
> > false
> >
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 15:55 -0800, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:40 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 01/12/2011 01:22 Sean Bruno said the following:
> > > I have a Shuttle based intel box that appears to have some pretty
> > > bad ACPI implementation. Is there a good way to q
So, now that you've improved the default diagnostic output of make, how
about the OP's original request:
make -s truly silent by removing unnecessary diagnostic messages when -s
is used? :)
[Thought I'd bring the thread back around to it's original purpose.]
--
Freddie Cash
fjwc...@gmail.com
[cc list trimmed]
on 21/11/2011 18:32 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Friday, November 18, 2011 4:59:32 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 17/11/2011 23:38 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Thursday, November 17, 2011 4:35:07 pm John Baldwin wrote:
Hmmm, you could also make critical_ex
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 04:44:24PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
> (GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
> I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program
> (details in
On Thursday 01 December 2011 11:44:13 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > > According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with
> > > device ugen
> > > in config file.
> > >
> > > I tried that in the kernel config when upgrad
On Thursday 01 December 2011 03:37 am, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
> On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
> >> > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.
>
Hi,
on FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r228176M: Thu Dec 1 13:56:02 CET 2011
(GENERIC + CAPABILITIES + netmap with head.diff and bge patches applied)
I get these lock order reversals when running a netmap-enabled program
(details in the attachment) with syscall (54, FreeBSD ELF64, sys_ioctl):
Dec 1 16:
On Thursday, December 01, 2011 2:15:11 am Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Best
wrote:
> >> On Wed Nov 30 11, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Alexander Best
wrote:
> >>> >
On Wednesday, November 30, 2011 11:41:25 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 13:43:20 Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > With the help of cognet, I wrote a patch to turn devctl into a multiple
> > openable device, that mean that it will allow to open /dev/devct
On 1 December 2011 10:44, Max Khon wrote:
> Are you sure you mean profile support and not CTF data?
Hi Max,
I mean profile support.
Havent tested on 9.0, but definitely the case with prior versions.
Will try & repeat the process & report back if this is not a common
occurrence which has been rep
is there a chance to change cp's behaviour in connection with the -R switch, so
that it stops after the first error? i just ran into the following situation:
1) cp -ai bla /mnt/umass
2) i got a lot of warnings that /mnt/umass was full
3) cp -an bla /mnt/umass
4) ...that didn't work, since cp creat
> On Wednesday 30 November 2011 11:24:39 Thomas Mueller wrote:
> > According to ugen man page, ugen can be compiled into the kernel with
> > device ugen
> > in config file.
> > I tried that in the kernel config when upgrading from FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 to
> > RC2, but the kernel build stopped quickly wi
pfctl -v -s nat
rdr inet6 proto tcp from any to 2001:49f0:4004::/48 port = 9191 ->
:::67.159.46.238
[ Evaluations: 512 Packets: 3 Bytes: 228 States: 1
]
[ Inserted: uid 0 pid 80940 State Creations: 2 ]
I can see here that after i tried on another host to t
Sevan,
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 6:56 AM, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
On 30/11/2011 16:03, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>
>> system breaks if you try to add dtrace support to a system built with
>> profile support.
>>
>
> sorry, I meant *without* profile support.
Are you sure you mean profile support and
On 1 December 2011 13:17, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote:
>> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
>> > Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>>
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 12:12:18PM +0300, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote:
> > On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
> > Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
> >
> >> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
>
On 1 December 2011 10:20, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:22:39 +0300
> Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>
>> On 29 November 2011 20:16, Maxim Khitrov wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Sergey Kandaurov
>> > wrote:
>> >> On 26 November 2011 11:44, Milan Obuch
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
> Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a better option here.
> Can't help with patch, stuck with pre Nov 15 CURRENT myself.
on 27/11/2011 1
On 01/12/2011 00:35, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 01/12/2011 01:27 Jung-uk Kim said the following:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 06:07 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
Using new vm_page_alloc_cont
61 matches
Mail list logo
