Am 06.12.2011 07:14, schrieb KOT MATPOCKuH:
> Hello all!
>
> On 24 nov I updated sources via csup to RELENG_9 (9.0-PRERELEASE).
> After make installboot I successfully booted to single user.
> But after make installworld system was fail to boot with message:
> ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavai
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, list, mailing wrote:
> > I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own.
> >
> > I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/
> > Last update was 201107
>
> Strange.
>
> >
> > Where do I get the Current sn
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, list, mailing wrote:
> I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own.
>
> I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/
> Last update was 201107
Strange.
>
> Where do I get the Current snapshot of 10. (Or do I upgrade from 9.0-RC2)?
You need up build from
Hello all!
On 24 nov I updated sources via csup to RELENG_9 (9.0-PRERELEASE).
After make installboot I successfully booted to single user.
But after make installworld system was fail to boot with message:
ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavailable
Invalid format
status command shows status of al
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
>> [non-exclusively] on the following:
>>
> After finally having been able to complete a build, the res
Hi *,
[I could have renamed the subject 1001 fancy ways to crash FreeBSD,
but I'll avoid :)]
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
> [non-exclusively] on the following:
>
After finally having been able to
John wrote:
> After pondering the best way to allow the VOP_ACCESS() call to
> only query for the permissions really needed, I've come up with
> a patch that minimally adds one parameter to the nlm_get_vfs_state()
> function call with the lock type from the original argp.
>
> http://people.freebsd
John wrote:
> After pondering the best way to allow the VOP_ACCESS() call to
> only query for the permissions really needed, I've come up with
> a patch that minimally adds one parameter to the nlm_get_vfs_state()
> function call with the lock type from the original argp.
>
> http://people.freebsd
On 12/5/2011 4:38 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 06/12/2011 00:22 Alan Cox said the following:
On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following:
On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pag
You can't get line rate with ixgbe, in what configuration/hardware?
We surely do get line rate in validation here, but its sensitive to
your hardware and config.
Jack
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
> >
> > On
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:08:54PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote:
> You can't get line rate with ixgbe, in what configuration/hardware?
> We surely do get line rate in validation here, but its sensitive to
> your hardware and config.
sources from HEAD as of a week or so, default parameter setting,
82599
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/05/11 14:15, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
> [non-exclusively] on the following:
>
> dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
> different size [-Wint-t
on 06/12/2011 00:22 Alan Cox said the following:
> On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following:
>>> On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages
are
not
normall
On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following:
On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are not
normally busy; the correct explanation is quite a bit longer than this, the
commen
Hi,
The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes
[non-exclusively] on the following:
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of
different size [-Wint-t
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> > - have two machines connected by a 10G link
> > - on one run "nuttcp -S"
> > - on the other one run "nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip"
> >
>
> Any particular tuning of F
on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following:
> On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are
>> not
>> normally busy; the correct explanation is quite a bit longer than this, the
>> comment in the code explains VPO_BUSY
On 12/5/11 9:38 AM, Mark Martinec wrote:
Nathan wrote:
The installer will align all partitions to the GEOM stripesize/offset.
We could make it do min(4KB, stripesize), but in general I think this is
better done at the GEOM level.
I doubt any SSD device on the market will want to admit its
inter
On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> - have two machines connected by a 10G link
> - on one run "nuttcp -S"
> - on the other one run "nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip"
>
Any particular tuning of FreeBSD?
Daniel
___
freebsd-current@f
In message
, Maxim Khitrov writes:
>How do you get around the hardware claiming to use 512-byte sectors
>when it actually uses 4 kB internally?
Did you read what I wrote ?
] If the disk-driver has a 4k drive, or suspects it has a 4k drive (
] these properties are advisory only), it should anno
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message
>
> , Maxim Khitrov writes:
>
>>Interesting... But [...]
>
> A "But" which I read to mean "Nahh, too hard, lets just hack it..."
>
> I don't agree with that, we should do it right.
How do you get around the hardware claiming
Xin LI wrote:
> Try procstat -kk to find the calling stack, as a start?
> This could be very useful when tracking down problems.
> Also the 'D' flag from ps(1) output in most times are not quite useful
> and ps -o wchan would tell you what exactly it was waiting for, just FYI.
Posted both a few d
Hi,
I am trying to establish the baseline performance for 10G throughput
over TCP, and would like to collect some data points. As a testing
program i am using nuttcp from ports (as good as anything, i
guess -- it is reasonably flexible, and if you use it in
TCP with relatively large writes, the ov
In message
, Maxim Khitrov writes:
>Interesting... But [...]
A "But" which I read to mean "Nahh, too hard, lets just hack it..."
I don't agree with that, we should do it right.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD comm
Defaulting alignment to 4kb would also help drastically in most
virtualization environments due to the underlying (and its essentially
invisible to the guest os) shared storage that is likely being used.
--
Curtis Ruck
Anytime: 347-542-7825
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:40, Mark Martinec wrote:
> >
On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2011 15:15 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Patch has been send upstream:
https://www.v
> Seems to me the min(4KB,stripesize) would be a safe bet.
s/min/max/
Mark
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Nathan wrote:
> The installer will align all partitions to the GEOM stripesize/offset.
> We could make it do min(4KB, stripesize), but in general I think this is
> better done at the GEOM level.
I doubt any SSD device on the market will want to admit its
internal structure, they all claim 512 sect
On 12/05/11 10:47, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec
> wri
> tes:
>> Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
>> (from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
>>
>> # gpart s
> Btw (unrelated), tried the same with a 2 TB (virtual) disk, the
> guided partitioning suggested 64k boot, 2TB ufs, and 4GB swap,
> but then fails with "No free space left on device".
> Didn't investigate, looks like a bug.
Sorry, my mistake, please disregard this claim.
I chose "create" instead
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec
> wri
> tes:
>>Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
>>(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
>>
On 11/23/11 15:03, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Adam McDougall wrote:
I often use the serial console on my servers through ILOM remote console
access to install FreeBSD because it lets me cut and paste commands into a
live shell from install media. Back with FreeBSD
On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Claude Buisson wrote:
> On 12/05/2011 16:28, Tom Evans wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert
>> wrote:
>>> Tom Evans writes:
>>>
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
> CVS != csup.
>
> I wonder how many people will e
Hi current users,
Regarding the MK_CTF=XXX changes, did you check that code is still compliant
for external ports?
--HPS
On Monday 05 December 2011 14:39:56 Robert Huff wrote:
> Hello:
> When trying to update I get:
>
> ===> Building for cuse4bsd-kmod-0.1.21_2
> make -f
> /data/port-wor
In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec wri
tes:
>Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
>(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
>
># gpart show /dev/ada0
>=> 34 134217661 ada0 GPT (64G)
>
Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk
(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning:
# gpart show /dev/ada0
=> 34 134217661 ada0 GPT (64G)
34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k)
162 125828992 2 freebsd-ufs
On 12/05/2011 16:28, Tom Evans wrote:
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Tom Evans writes:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
CVS != csup.
I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when
they really mean cvsup/csup.
I wasn't going t
Tom Evans writes:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
>> CVS != csup.
>>
>> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when
>> they really mean cvsup/csup.
>
> I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as CVS will not be going
> anywhere any time soon, I am s
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
> Tom Evans writes:
>
>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
>>> CVS != csup.
>>>
>>> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when
>>> they really mean cvsup/csup.
>>
>> I wasn't going to jump onto this bi
.. they'll work the same way things w/ src work at the moment, which I
believe is:
* stuff is in svn;
* svn2cvs runs;
* cvsup mirrors the cvs repository;
* users use cvsup against that.
So this is a non-issue. :)
Adrian
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Replying to a "random" message in this thread
On 12/05/2011 13:49, Tom Evans wrote:
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
CVS != csup.
I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when
they really mean cvsup/csup.
I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as C
Hello.
I think I have some problem building current on my system (which is not
current).
# uname -a
FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Tue Oct 18 18:51:43 UTC 2011
r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
# pwd
/zpool0/testenv/sources/10-kms/lib/libc
# svn info
Path: .
Work
on 05/12/2011 15:15 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
> On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
>>> On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Patch has been send upstream:
https://www.virtualbox.org/pi
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/4/11 9:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/4/11 3:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
This seems too reasonable a suggestion, but, as always, the devil
is in the details. There will be long. painful disc
On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
Patch has been send upstream:
https://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/2011-December/004842.html
Patches have been committed upstream. Tha
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote:
> CVS != csup.
>
> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when
> they really mean cvsup/csup.
I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as CVS will not be going
anywhere any time soon, I am sure.
I use cvs, rather than cs
on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following:
> On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
>> Patch has been send upstream:
>>
>>
>> https://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/2011-December/004842.html
>
> Patches have been committed upstream. Thanks a lot guys!
>
> https://ww
On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On 01.12.2011 09:37, Bernhard Froehlich wrote:
On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following:
> Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a bet
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:56:11 -0800
Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 12/4/11 12:30 PM, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
> > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:25:19 +0200
> > Kostik Belousov wrote:
> >
> >> Try to set sysctl security.bsd.map_at_zero to 1.
> > I didn't even think of that. It helped, thanks :)
> >
> do you
On 12/4/11 9:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/4/11 3:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
This seems too reasonable a suggestion, but, as always, the devil
is in the details. There will be long. painful discussions (and
arguments) about what to remove
50 matches
Mail list logo