Re: ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavailable Invalid format

2011-12-05 Thread Peter Maloney
Am 06.12.2011 07:14, schrieb KOT MATPOCKuH: > Hello all! > > On 24 nov I updated sources via csup to RELENG_9 (9.0-PRERELEASE). > After make installboot I successfully booted to single user. > But after make installworld system was fail to boot with message: > ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavai

Re: Looking to start Testing 10-current on Vbox

2011-12-05 Thread Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 2:20 AM, Eitan Adler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, list, mailing wrote: > > I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own. > > > > I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ > > Last update was 201107 > > Strange. > > > > > Where do I get the Current sn

Re: Looking to start Testing 10-current on Vbox

2011-12-05 Thread Eitan Adler
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 1:01 PM, list, mailing wrote: > I'm looking to start testing 10 on my own. > > I went to: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ > Last update was 201107 Strange. > > Where do I get the Current snapshot of 10.  (Or do I upgrade from 9.0-RC2)? You need up build from

ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavailable Invalid format

2011-12-05 Thread KOT MATPOCKuH
Hello all! On 24 nov I updated sources via csup to RELENG_9 (9.0-PRERELEASE). After make installboot I successfully booted to single user. But after make installworld system was fail to boot with message: ZFS: i/o error all block copies unavailable Invalid format status command shows status of al

Re: PAE broken on -current, likely broken on stable/9

2011-12-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes >> [non-exclusively] on the following: >> > After finally having been able to complete a build, the res

Re: PAE broken on -current, likely broken on stable/9

2011-12-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi *, [I could have renamed the subject 1001 fancy ways to crash FreeBSD, but I'll avoid :)] On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes > [non-exclusively] on the following: > After finally having been able to

Re: F_RDLCK lock to FreeBSD NFS server fails to R/O target file (nasty little bug)

2011-12-05 Thread Rick Macklem
John wrote: > After pondering the best way to allow the VOP_ACCESS() call to > only query for the permissions really needed, I've come up with > a patch that minimally adds one parameter to the nlm_get_vfs_state() > function call with the lock type from the original argp. > > http://people.freebsd

Re: F_RDLCK lock to FreeBSD NFS server fails to R/O target file [PATCH]

2011-12-05 Thread Rick Macklem
John wrote: > After pondering the best way to allow the VOP_ACCESS() call to > only query for the permissions really needed, I've come up with > a patch that minimally adds one parameter to the nlm_get_vfs_state() > function call with the lock type from the original argp. > > http://people.freebsd

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
On 12/5/2011 4:38 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 06/12/2011 00:22 Alan Cox said the following: On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following: On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pag

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-05 Thread Jack Vogel
You can't get line rate with ixgbe, in what configuration/hardware? We surely do get line rate in validation here, but its sensitive to your hardware and config. Jack On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > > > On

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-05 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 03:08:54PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > You can't get line rate with ixgbe, in what configuration/hardware? > We surely do get line rate in validation here, but its sensitive to > your hardware and config. sources from HEAD as of a week or so, default parameter setting, 82599

Re: PAE broken on -current, likely broken on stable/9

2011-12-05 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/05/11 14:15, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes > [non-exclusively] on the following: > > dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of > different size [-Wint-t

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 06/12/2011 00:22 Alan Cox said the following: > On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following: >>> On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are not normall

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
On 12/5/2011 4:02 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following: On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are not normally busy; the correct explanation is quite a bit longer than this, the commen

PAE broken on -current, likely broken on stable/9

2011-12-05 Thread Arnaud Lacombe
Hi, The kernel tree is utterly broken when PAE is enabled, it chokes [non-exclusively] on the following: dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] dev/dpt/dpt_scsi.c:279: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-t

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-05 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:15:09PM +0200, Daniel Kalchev wrote: > > On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > > - have two machines connected by a 10G link > > - on one run "nuttcp -S" > > - on the other one run "nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip" > > > > Any particular tuning of F

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/12/2011 19:58 Alan Cox said the following: > On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> Pages should be marked busy only for some special occasions, wired pages are >> not >> normally busy; the correct explanation is quite a bit longer than this, the >> comment in the code explains VPO_BUSY

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On 12/5/11 9:38 AM, Mark Martinec wrote: Nathan wrote: The installer will align all partitions to the GEOM stripesize/offset. We could make it do min(4KB, stripesize), but in general I think this is better done at the GEOM level. I doubt any SSD device on the market will want to admit its inter

Re: datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Kalchev
On Dec 5, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > - have two machines connected by a 10G link > - on one run "nuttcp -S" > - on the other one run "nuttcp -t -T 5 -w 128 -v the.other.ip" > Any particular tuning of FreeBSD? Daniel ___ freebsd-current@f

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Maxim Khitrov writes: >How do you get around the hardware claiming to use 512-byte sectors >when it actually uses 4 kB internally? Did you read what I wrote ? ] If the disk-driver has a 4k drive, or suspects it has a 4k drive ( ] these properties are advisory only), it should anno

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message > > , Maxim Khitrov writes: > >>Interesting... But [...] > > A "But" which I read to mean "Nahh, too hard, lets just hack it..." > > I don't agree with that, we should do it right. How do you get around the hardware claiming

Re: iSCSI initiator: iscontrol cannot be stopped or killed

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Martinec
Xin LI wrote: > Try procstat -kk to find the calling stack, as a start? > This could be very useful when tracking down problems. > Also the 'D' flag from ps(1) output in most times are not quite useful > and ps -o wchan would tell you what exactly it was waiting for, just FYI. Posted both a few d

datapoints on 10G throughput with TCP ?

2011-12-05 Thread Luigi Rizzo
Hi, I am trying to establish the baseline performance for 10G throughput over TCP, and would like to collect some data points. As a testing program i am using nuttcp from ports (as good as anything, i guess -- it is reasonably flexible, and if you use it in TCP with relatively large writes, the ov

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message , Maxim Khitrov writes: >Interesting... But [...] A "But" which I read to mean "Nahh, too hard, lets just hack it..." I don't agree with that, we should do it right. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD comm

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Curtis Ruck
Defaulting alignment to 4kb would also help drastically in most virtualization environments due to the underlying (and its essentially invisible to the guest os) shared storage that is likely being used. -- Curtis Ruck Anytime: 347-542-7825 On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 12:40, Mark Martinec wrote: > >

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Alan Cox
On 12/05/2011 07:56, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/12/2011 15:15 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Patch has been send upstream: https://www.v

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Martinec
> Seems to me the min(4KB,stripesize) would be a safe bet. s/min/max/ Mark ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Martinec
Nathan wrote: > The installer will align all partitions to the GEOM stripesize/offset. > We could make it do min(4KB, stripesize), but in general I think this is > better done at the GEOM level. I doubt any SSD device on the market will want to admit its internal structure, they all claim 512 sect

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 12/05/11 10:47, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec > wri > tes: >> Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk >> (from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning: >> >> # gpart s

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Martinec
> Btw (unrelated), tried the same with a 2 TB (virtual) disk, the > guided partitioning suggested 64k boot, 2TB ufs, and 4GB swap, > but then fails with "No free space left on device". > Didn't investigate, looks like a bug. Sorry, my mistake, please disregard this claim. I chose "create" instead

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Maxim Khitrov
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec > wri > tes: >>Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk >>(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning: >>

Re: Trouble getting serial support for "Live CD" in 9 installer

2011-12-05 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/23/11 15:03, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: I often use the serial console on my servers through ILOM remote console access to install FreeBSD because it lets me cut and paste commands into a live shell from install media. Back with FreeBSD

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Dec 5, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Claude Buisson wrote: > On 12/05/2011 16:28, Tom Evans wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert >> wrote: >>> Tom Evans writes: >>> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: > CVS != csup. > > I wonder how many people will e

Re: problem compiling cuse4bsd-kmod

2011-12-05 Thread Hans Petter Selasky
Hi current users, Regarding the MK_CTF=XXX changes, did you check that code is still compliant for external ports? --HPS On Monday 05 December 2011 14:39:56 Robert Huff wrote: > Hello: > When trying to update I get: > > ===> Building for cuse4bsd-kmod-0.1.21_2 > make -f > /data/port-wor

Re: bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <201112051743.13483.mark.martinec+free...@ijs.si>, Mark Martinec wri tes: >Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk >(from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning: > ># gpart show /dev/ada0 >=> 34 134217661 ada0 GPT (64G) >

bsdinstall guided partitioning should 4k-align swap and ufs partitions

2011-12-05 Thread Mark Martinec
Using a guided partitioning install of 9.0-RC2 on a 64GB (virtual) disk (from a 9.0-RC2 ISO image) results in the following GPT partitioning: # gpart show /dev/ada0 => 34 134217661 ada0 GPT (64G) 34128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 125828992 2 freebsd-ufs

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Claude Buisson
On 12/05/2011 16:28, Tom Evans wrote: On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: Tom Evans writes: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: CVS != csup. I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when they really mean cvsup/csup. I wasn't going t

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Lowell Gilbert
Tom Evans writes: > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: >> CVS != csup. >> >> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when >> they really mean cvsup/csup. > > I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as CVS will not be going > anywhere any time soon, I am s

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Tom Evans writes: > >> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: >>> CVS != csup. >>> >>> I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when >>> they really mean cvsup/csup. >> >> I wasn't going to jump onto this bi

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Adrian Chadd
.. they'll work the same way things w/ src work at the moment, which I believe is: * stuff is in svn; * svn2cvs runs; * cvsup mirrors the cvs repository; * users use cvsup against that. So this is a non-issue. :) Adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Claude Buisson
Replying to a "random" message in this thread On 12/05/2011 13:49, Tom Evans wrote: On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: CVS != csup. I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when they really mean cvsup/csup. I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as C

Problem building current

2011-12-05 Thread Alexander Yerenkow
Hello. I think I have some problem building current on my system (which is not current). # uname -a FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 FreeBSD 9.0-RC1 #0: Tue Oct 18 18:51:43 UTC 2011 r...@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pwd /zpool0/testenv/sources/10-kms/lib/libc # svn info Path: . Work

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/12/2011 15:15 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: > On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: >>> On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Patch has been send upstream: https://www.virtualbox.org/pi

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Daniel Eischen
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, Julian Elischer wrote: On 12/4/11 9:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 12/4/11 3:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote: This seems too reasonable a suggestion, but, as always, the devil is in the details. There will be long. painful disc

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 05.12.2011 14:06, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Patch has been send upstream: https://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/2011-December/004842.html Patches have been committed upstream. Tha

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Tom Evans
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Max Khon wrote: > CVS != csup. > > I wonder how many people will express their sentiments about CVS when > they really mean cvsup/csup. I wasn't going to jump onto this bikeshed, as CVS will not be going anywhere any time soon, I am sure. I use cvs, rather than cs

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 05/12/2011 14:57 Bernhard Froehlich said the following: > On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: >> Patch has been send upstream: >> >> >> https://www.virtualbox.org/pipermail/vbox-dev/2011-December/004842.html > > Patches have been committed upstream. Thanks a lot guys! > > https://ww

Re: Freeze with 10.0 and VirtualBox {4.1.4|4.1.6|4.1.51r38464}

2011-12-05 Thread Bernhard Froehlich
On 02.12.2011 12:55, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 01.12.2011 09:37, Bernhard Froehlich wrote: On 01.12.2011 00:07, Jung-uk Kim wrote: On Wednesday 30 November 2011 05:32 pm, Andriy Gapon wrote: on 26/11/2011 18:33 Gleb Kurtsou said the following: > Using new vm_page_alloc_contig() may be a bet

Re: [maybe spam] Re: running old binaries on -current

2011-12-05 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
On Sun, 04 Dec 2011 13:56:11 -0800 Julian Elischer wrote: > On 12/4/11 12:30 PM, Yamagi Burmeister wrote: > > On Sun, 4 Dec 2011 22:25:19 +0200 > > Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > >> Try to set sysctl security.bsd.map_at_zero to 1. > > I didn't even think of that. It helped, thanks :) > > > do you

Re: CVS removal from the base

2011-12-05 Thread Julian Elischer
On 12/4/11 9:21 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote: On Dec 4, 2011, at 7:42 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: On 12/4/11 3:36 PM, Randy Bush wrote: This seems too reasonable a suggestion, but, as always, the devil is in the details. There will be long. painful discussions (and arguments) about what to remove