--- On Fri, 2012/1/13, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, January 03, 2012 7:31:59 pm Adrian Connolly wrote:
> On 2012/01/04, at 0:37, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>
> > On Monday, January 02, 2012 11:39:10 pm aconnoll...@yahoo.co.jp wrote:
> >> I am running 9.0-RC3 on an Acer Aspire One D255E netbook.
Hi,
Issues with USB 3.0 HUBs should be fixed in 10-current after:
http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230091
And will be MFC'ed to 9-stable and 8-stable next week.
Please test!
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
Hello guys;
As some of you may have noticed I have been replacing
some GPL'd headers from the sound system.
In the case of the Maestro3 snd driver, basically
the same headers are available in the BSD licensed
OSS drivers (in the Attic though - that card is
rather old).
If someone still has that
I have tryed as ULE as SCHED_4BSD, no changes
in both cases low throughput
CPUload http://piccy.info/view3/2478224/e5d7f208538d05d813411c34eb493a8f/orig/
if load http://piccy.info/view3/2478228/bf8dca5fad12c1436092f4d6aaf2356f/orig/
looking on graphs CPU load it seems strange distribution...
i
Martin Cracauer wrote:
> More findings.
>
> Reminder, with the original report I found:
> - files for no reason changing ownership and group to
> root/
> - data corruption as in inserting binary junk obviously from ports
> - data corruption as in malformed ascii text that might be a bug I
> have i
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
>> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
>> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
>>
>>
More findings.
Reminder, with the original report I found:
- files for no reason changing ownership and group to
root/
- data corruption as in inserting binary junk obviously from ports
- data corruption as in malformed ascii text that might be a bug I
have in my code that is only exposed in F
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 04:11:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> > Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> > affects ports/misc/compat8x/
>
> Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
>
on 13/01/2012 14:57 George Kontostanos said the following:
> Still the question remains regarding COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and how does this
> affects ports/misc/compat8x/
Looks like all the previous hints have not been clear enough.
There is no direct relation between COMPAT_FREEBSD8 and misc/compat8x.
CO
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> George Kontostanos schreef:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> on 13/01/2012 11:59 Doug Barton said the following:
On 01/13/2012 01:52, George Kontostanos wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at
on 13/01/2012 12:19 Doug Barton said the following:
> On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
>> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
>> kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
>
> Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
> chan
On 01/13/2012 02:06, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote:
> Why can't it be that only shared libraries should be bumped, but no
> kernel incompatible changes were introduced?
Because one of the reasons we have major branches is so that we can
change the various API/KPI/etc. in the newer branch.
Doug
--
George Kontostanos wrote:
Greetings all and my apologies for cross posting!
There seems to be a confusion regarding the ABI change in FreeBSD 9
and if this affects the usual upgrade path which includes a full port
rebuild.
The relevant post is here: http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=28
13 matches
Mail list logo
