[head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98

2012-02-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/pc98 TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:13 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on i386/i386

2012-02-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for i386/i386 TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:13 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:13 - /usr/bin/c

[head tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64

2012-02-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:00 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:34 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-11 05:50:34 - /usr/bin

[head tinderbox] failure on powerpc/powerpc

2012-02-11 Thread FreeBSD Tinderbox
TB --- 2012-02-11 08:03:21 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-02-11 08:03:21 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc/powerpc TB --- 2012-02-11 08:03:21 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2012-02-11 08:03:25 - cvsupping the source tree TB --- 2012-02-11 08:03:25 - /usr

Re: Beta 3 still not OK

2012-02-11 Thread Julien Laffaye
On 2/11/2012 2:13 AM, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: Seems that the sqlite database has changed from beta1 to beta3??? I have all the system running exclusive on pkg there is no more "old pkg" How can I upgrade the sqlite database from beta1 to beta3??? There is nothing to upgrade. The on-disk

Re: Processes getting stuck in state tmpfs

2012-02-11 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (10/02/2012 22:41), Florian Smeets wrote: > Hi, > > if you set WRKDIRPREFIX to a tmpfs mountpoint and try to build audio/gsm > from ports one of the mv processes gets stuck in state tmpfs quite > often. Traces from a kernel with WITTNESS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS are > available here http://tb.smeets

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-11 Thread Joel Dahl
On 10-02-2012 9:03, Eitan Adler wrote: > Picking a random person to reply to. > > There are a lot of good suggestions in this thread, but can we please > remember a few things: > > - Users can always add their own ~/.cshrc > - Many users will get annoyed by what is someone else's amazing setup

Re: [CFT] Xorg Upgrade 7.5.2

2012-02-11 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I've run it for a while now and am actually having a pretty serious issue: http://thorn.visualtech.com/screenshot.jpg As you can see, that big window on the right monitor (though certainly doesn't limit itself to just that screen) is almost entirely corrupt. It's an xfce4 Terminal, though this c

Re: Beta 3 still not OK

2012-02-11 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:08:28PM -0200, Sergio de Almeida Lenzi wrote: > Em Sáb, 2012-02-11 às 00:38 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin escreveu: > > > Sorry pkg add was broken in beta2 this release fixes it. > > > > Changes: > > * fix pkg add (it is been broken during beta2 sorry about that) > > * fix

[CFT] ext2/3 nanosecond timestamps patch.

2012-02-11 Thread Pedro Giffuni
Hello; I have been working on implementing some ext4 features that can work in ext3 mode in preparation towards bringing some more of the ext4 work Zheng Liu did for his GSoC 2010 project. The first of this features is nanosecond/birthtime timestamping, which basically means that if the filesyst

Re: Enhancing the user experience with tcsh

2012-02-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On 2/11/12 12:07 AM, Joel Dahl wrote: On 10-02-2012 9:03, Eitan Adler wrote: Picking a random person to reply to. There are a lot of good suggestions in this thread, but can we please remember a few things: - Users can always add their own ~/.cshrc - Many users will get annoyed by what is som