Il 25 febbraio 2012 07:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org ha scritto:
On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
2.8 both give the same error.
Did you
Hi all,
Maybe some spam filters ate my mails so I am replying to current@.
Could anyone help to commit it?
Regards,
Jia-Shiun
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Jia-Shiun Li jiash...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexander,
I've submitted a PR for this:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Attilio Rao atti...@freebsd.org wrote:
Il 25 febbraio 2012 07:15, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org ha scritto:
On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
subject when trying to start postfix. I
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 12:22:36PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
Try this for fixing the panic. New-bus was not clearing the description
if a device's attach routine failed.
Thanks, this patch indeed fixes the panic.
./danfe
___
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then tried
2.8 both give the same error.
Backing
On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped
down compared to regular libgcc, because most of that
stuff is in our libc instead.
You
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 10:41:59 -0800
Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
On Feb 23, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:11:13 -0800
Tim Kientzle t...@kientzle.com wrote:
If I understand correctly, the libgcc in base is pretty stripped
down compared
On 02/25/2012 06:34, Giovanni Trematerra wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02/24/2012 21:00, Doug Barton wrote:
I'm on today's -current (r232126) and I'm getting the error in the
subject when trying to start postfix. I recompiled 2.9, and then
Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
I've used. Entered env -i stated as prefix to make buildkernel
KERNCONF=$VERSION command.
Kernel build stops with following immediate error:
ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
config version = 67, version required = 600010.
Okay. Now I've
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
I've used. Entered env -i stated as prefix to make buildkernel
KERNCONF=$VERSION command.
Kernel build stops with following immediate error:
ERROR: version of config(8) does not match kernel!
Okay,
Will I need to restate all as 10_CURRENT for the
kernel(standard)-supfile or should I use the cvs-supfile as the
template with 10.0_CURRENT as the tag?
On 2/25/12, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
Machine: PowerPC 7445
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 12:09:47AM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
On 2/25/12, Glen Barber g...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 11:23:10PM -0500, Super Bisquit wrote:
Machine: PowerPC 7445 Kernel 9.0
I've used. Entered env -i stated as prefix to make buildkernel
KERNCONF=$VERSION
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Super Bisquit superbisq...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay,
Will I need to restate all as 10_CURRENT for the
kernel(standard)-supfile or should I use the cvs-supfile as the
template with 10.0_CURRENT as the tag?
You will need to change the tag in the standard supfile
Both standard-supfile and kernel-supfile were edited to use the .
tag along with the CVS server being cvsup.FreeBSDS.org; but, I'm still
getting the version error for config(8). It seems to me that my
problem may be the base system is out of sync with the source- I'm
using Whitehorn's 2010
14 matches
Mail list logo
