Re: SU+J and fsck problem ?

2012-03-11 Thread Alex Keda
On 10.03.2012 14:01, jb wrote: Hi, FB9.0-RELEASE; no updates or recompilation. In multi-user mode: $ mount /dev/ada0s2a on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) The fs was in normal state (no known problem, clean shutdown), Booted by choice in single-user mode. # mount /dev/ada0s2a on /

[RFC, RFT] LDM support (aka Windows Dynamic Volumes)

2012-03-11 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Hi, All i wrote GEOM_PART_LDM class. It provides basic support of Logical Disk Manager partitioning scheme [1]. Since LDM metadata is not documented i used several articles found in the web and linux implementation as reference [2]. Only generic volumes is supported. Spanned, striped and raid5

Re: RFC: FUSE kernel module for the kernel...

2012-03-11 Thread Gustau Pérez
On 08/03/2012 22:20, George Neville-Neil wrote: Howdy, I've taken the GSoC work done with the FUSE kernel module, and created a patch against HEAD which I have now subjected to testing using tools/regression/fsx. The patch is here: http://people.freebsd.org/~gnn/head-fuse-1.diff I would like

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r232730: buildworld broken with CLANG?

2012-03-11 Thread O. Hartmann
On 03/10/12 19:09, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 2012-03-10 17:11, Ivan Klymenko wrote: В Sat, 10 Mar 2012 14:26:42 +0100 Dimitry Andric d...@freebsd.org пишет: ... Unfortunately, you did a -j build, which makes the actual errors difficult to find, and if you show only the last few lines, as you

Re: SU+J and fsck problem ?

2012-03-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Please file a PR and put as much debugging output as you can. I haven't had it fail for me on any of my test machines that panic _very frequently_. But I only hvae a single disk with minimal IO, I haven't had it crash doing lots of ongoing server style iO. adrian On 11 March 2012 00:19, Alex

Re: SU+J and fsck problem ?

2012-03-11 Thread jb
Adrian Chadd adrian at freebsd.org writes: Please file a PR and put as much debugging output as you can. ... Because this is a case of clean shutdown and oing on purpose to single user mode to see how these hings behave, I assume I can go and try again and collect similar info. But, is there

Re: SU+J and fsck problem ?

2012-03-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi, I think you've included enough info. I don't know if fsck is supposed to work that way with journalling but if not, it'd be nice to get that documented. I'd also like to see that timestamp mismatch print out the timestamps so we can see what's going on. Eg, if your clock is somehow skewing.

Re: [RFC, RFT] LDM support (aka Windows Dynamic Volumes)

2012-03-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
This is awesome! Is it just read-only, or does it allow creation/destruction of LDM volumes? Adrian 2012/3/11 Andrey V. Elsukov bu7c...@yandex.ru: Hi, All i wrote GEOM_PART_LDM class. It provides basic support of Logical Disk Manager partitioning scheme [1]. Since LDM metadata is not

sudo through ssh broken on -current?

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I noted some thing odd when executing the following .. /home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list sudo: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:2644: Failed assertion: (run-regs_mask[elm] (1U bit)) == 0 Abort Adding '-t' as a parameter to ssh

Re: sudo through ssh broken on -current?

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/12 20:07, Glen Barber wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:55:02PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: I noted some thing odd when executing the following .. /home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list sudo: (malloc)

Re: sudo through ssh broken on -current?

2012-03-11 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:55:02PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: I noted some thing odd when executing the following .. /home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list sudo: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:2644: Failed assertion: (run-regs_mask[elm] (1U bit)) == 0 Abort Adding

Re: sudo through ssh broken on -current?

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Butler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/12 20:14, Michael Butler wrote: On 03/11/12 20:07, Glen Barber wrote: On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 07:55:02PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote: I noted some thing odd when executing the following .. /home/imb ssh imb@ sudo /sbin/ipfw list

Re: growfs remove ufs/label and can't reset it with tunefs

2012-03-11 Thread Matt Thyer
2012/3/9 Olivier Cochard-Labbé oliv...@cochard.me Hi all, once run growfs on a partition that had an UFS label, this label is removed and it's no more possible to re-set it with tunefs. Here is how to reproduce (tested on 8.3 and 9.0): mdconfig -a -t malloc -s 10MB gpart create -s mbr

Re: [RFC, RFT] LDM support (aka Windows Dynamic Volumes)

2012-03-11 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 11.03.2012 23:31, Adrian Chadd wrote: This is awesome! Is it just read-only, or does it allow creation/destruction of LDM volumes? It is read-only, but you can partially destroy LDM metadata on given disk. LDM keeps information about all volumes on each disk, and i guess windows can