On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 01:44:02AM -0400, AN wrote:
> FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
> 17:36:38 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> After a recent update on Sunday to r234042 I am having a problem with 2
> ports:
>
> gedit
>
TB --- 2012-04-10 00:20:00 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-04-10 00:20:00 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Mar 26 13:54:12 EDT 2012
d...@freebsd-current.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
TB --- 2012-
FreeBSD FBSD10 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #7 r234042: Sun Apr 8
17:36:38 EDT 2012 root@FBSD10:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
After a recent update on Sunday to r234042 I am having a problem with 2
ports:
gedit
evince
(using Gnome2 - ports tree up to date)
My last update (be
Thanks kwhite,
I found an another lock issue. Please try a patch included.
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012 10:31:39 -0400 (EDT)
kwh...@site.uottawa.ca wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Please try an attached patch that improves handlings of fs locks.
> > I think that this patch can resolve this issue. If that works well,
Hi,
>From the DTrace tutorial at AsiaBSDCon 2012, it is a CDDL
license issue.
Addition from my experiences, some applicaions can not be
built on DTrace/UserlandDTrace-enabled system (VBox is) and
Userland dtrace is still unstable.
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 02:18:38 +0100
Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
>
Hi,
Ryan Stone got a chance to give a brief talk at the dtrace.conf last week where
he covered the status of support on FreeBSD.
http://smartos.org/2012/04/09/dtrace-conf-2012-dtrace-on-freebsd/
I was wondering if the reason outlined by Ryan for why it DTrace isn't switched
on by default still h
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:24:30PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> could you not parse the @ differently depending upon where it is?
>
> others must have covered this problem..
Indeed others have - none other than T. Berners-Lee, in RFC 1738 where
the format of a URL is specified:
In addition
On 4/9/12 1:50 PM, Ed Maste wrote:
Libfetch supports a username and password in a FTP or HTTP URL, but lacks
a method to specify '@' or ':' there, as they're used as URL component
separators. I discovered this issue because I have an FTP server that
uses an email address as the username, and I c
Libfetch supports a username and password in a FTP or HTTP URL, but lacks
a method to specify '@' or ':' there, as they're used as URL component
separators. I discovered this issue because I have an FTP server that
uses an email address as the username, and I can't use fetch(1) or
libfetch against
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 03:36:08PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46
On 04/05/12 21:45, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 05.04.2012 21:12, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I got a bit sidetrack'ed...]
2012/2/17 Alexander Motin:
On 17.02.2012 18:53, Arnaud Lacombe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Alexander Motin
wrote:
On 02/15/12 21:54, Jef
On Monday, April 09, 2012 3:10:00 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 11:01:03AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >> Hello,
> > >> there seems to be a problem
Hi;
I noticed that libedit is seriously outdated so I tried to sync it
with the upstream (NetBSD) tree.
For the time being I avoided the international support and
related changes since they move some files and, in general,
complicates getting things merged properly.
The resulting patch is here:
Reverting to r233960 works for me.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> Hi
>
> Please try an attached patch that improves handlings of fs locks.
> I think that this patch can resolve this issue. If that works well,
> I'm going to refine and commit it to head.
>
Thanks!
I tried your patch but get the same panic:
FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #6 r233856M: Mon Apr 9 09:4
On Apr 9, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 17:59 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh
On Mon, 2012-04-09 at 17:59 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 A
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Alex Keda wrote:
> FreeBSD bsd-test.moskb.local 9.9-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r234000: Sun
> Apr 8 03:02:51 MSK 2012
> root@bsd-test.moskb.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
>
> Proliant 320 G4
>
> freeze with Hyper-Threading enabled with last Line some about
> >
On Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:08:41 pm Warner Losh wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by
newbus.
> >> Basically, when device
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:41:15AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:
On Sun, 2012-04-08 at 06:58 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:10:55PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > >> On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +030
On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 17:57 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:46:41AM -0600, Ian Lepore wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-04-07 at 15:50 +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > there seems to be a problem with device attach sequence offered by newbus.
> > > Basically
On Apr 9, 2012, at 6:04 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 04/08/12 14:53, schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
>> Nikolay Denev wrote:
>>> On Apr 6, 2012, at 2:48 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>>
I'm looking for a way to force FreeBSD 10 to maintain/watch ECC errors
reported by UEFI (or BIOS).
Since ECC
On 9 Apr 2012 11:00, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> Am 04/09/12 11:15, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
> > On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:54:07AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> Am 04/08/12 17:29, schrieb David Wolfskill:
> >>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:29:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I loose hair ...
Am 04/08/12 14:53, schrieb Miroslav Lachman:
> Nikolay Denev wrote:
>> On Apr 6, 2012, at 2:48 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for a way to force FreeBSD 10 to maintain/watch ECC errors
>>> reported by UEFI (or BIOS).
>>> Since ECC is said to be essential for server systems both in buisne
Am 04/09/12 11:15, schrieb Anton Shterenlikht:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:54:07AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Am 04/08/12 17:29, schrieb David Wolfskill:
>>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:29:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
I loose hair ...
Since yesterady's "make world" (last make world: t
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 10:54:07AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Am 04/08/12 17:29, schrieb David Wolfskill:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:29:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> I loose hair ...
> >> Since yesterady's "make world" (last make world: the day before
> >> yesterday), getting FreeBSD 10.
Am 04/08/12 17:29, schrieb David Wolfskill:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:29:36PM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> I loose hair ...
>> Since yesterady's "make world" (last make world: the day before
>> yesterday), getting FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT/amd64 to r234000 or so, the X11
>> system on all of our FreeB
29 matches
Mail list logo
