Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 08/05/2012 08:51 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > Yes but only with gcc46 because cppunit needs the same libstdc++ as > libreoffice so with gcc 4.6 is needs to be built with bundled, while it is > unbundled with clang. So the "internal" cppunit was probably not needed in the environment

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Yamagi Burmeister
> I'd like to ask whether there are sites were binary packages could be > downloaded from and are there any experiences with installing them on > either 9-STABLE or 10-CURRENT? We (BSDForen.de) have unofficial packages build by the community at http://wiki.bsdforen.de/anwendungen/libreoffice_aus_i

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/07/12 20:22, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: > ... >> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my >> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After >> building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build >> ed

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread O. Hartmann
On 05/07/12 22:08, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> ... >>> The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my >>> case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG).

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-07 Thread Sergey Kandaurov
On 8 May 2012 05:14, Doug Barton wrote: > On 05/07/2012 13:11, Mateusz Guzik wrote: >> On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >>> On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote: > I got this with today's current, previous (workin

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Tue, May 08, 2012 at 08:10:25AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 07/05/2012 12:35 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because >>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoff

Re: : jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0"

2012-05-07 Thread Jason Evans
On May 7, 2012, at 12:19 PM, Steve Wills wrote: >> On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:54 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: >>> After applying Dimitry Andric's patches to contrib/jemalloc and >>> replacing >>> /usr/bin/as with one built last Sunday, I was finally(!) able to rebuild >>> head as of 234536: >>> >>> Free

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/07/2012 13:11, Mateusz Guzik wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: >>> On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote: I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719. panic: _mtx_loc

Re: updating from r231158 to 234465: mounting from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a failed with error 19

2012-05-07 Thread Anton Shterenlikht
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 10:39:51AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18P

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-07 Thread Mateusz Guzik
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:28:41PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > > On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote: > >> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719. > >> > >> panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex stru

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: > ... > > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my > > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After > > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 08:22:16PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: > ... > > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my > > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After > > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1,

Re: panic, seems related to r234386

2012-05-07 Thread Doug Barton
On 05/06/2012 15:19, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: > On 7 May 2012 01:54, Doug Barton wrote: >> I got this with today's current, previous (working) kernel is r232719. >> >> panic: _mtx_lock_sleep: recursed on non-recursive mutex struct mount mtx >> @ /frontier/svn/head/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:4595 ... > P

Re: : jemalloc_arena.c:182: Failed assertion: "p[i] == 0"

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Wills
> On Apr 21, 2012, at 11:54 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: >> After applying Dimitry Andric's patches to contrib/jemalloc and >> replacing >> /usr/bin/as with one built last Sunday, I was finally(!) able to rebuild >> head as of 234536: >> >> FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-C

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2012-05-07 12:22, Hartmann, O. wrote: ... > The error I faced was introduced by the port net/libcmis, which in my > case was built via gcc 4.6 (and doesn't build with CLANG). After > building libcmis with legacy gcc 4.2.1, I was able to build > editors/libreoffice without problems (as far as the

Re: updating from r231158 to 234465: mounting from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a failed with error 19

2012-05-07 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, May 04, 2012 4:07:24 pm Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:07:59AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Friday, May 04, 2012 7:51:33 am Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 02:46:18PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Thursday, May 03, 2012 11:35:1

does anyone care about periodic scripts?

2012-05-07 Thread Volodymyr Kostyrko
Hi all. It seems that patches to periodic scripts have hard time coming into the tree. I personally filed http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=conf/165817 and still there's no move despite change is purely cosmetical and just fixes "right way of things". And this is not just one and o

Re: Add GEOM_RAID to GENERIC?

2012-05-07 Thread Alexander Motin
The only argument that stopped me is that GEOM_RAID is more active in probing for metadata then ataraid. Now it tastes all 6 formats on every provider in system. ataraid tasted only first level and subset of formats depending on controller vendor. While it is possible to do the same, I am not sure

Re: ctfmerge core dump

2012-05-07 Thread Steve Wills
> On 2012/5/6 5:08, b. f. wrote: >> On 5/5/12, Steve Wills wrote: >>> Thanks for the info. I took a look at the dump and see this: >>> >>> % sudo gdb /usr/bin/ctfmerge ctfmerge.core >>> [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: Undefined symbol >>> "td_thr_getxmmregs"] > > Hmm, is the thre

Add GEOM_RAID to GENERIC?

2012-05-07 Thread John Baldwin
I installed 9.0 on a new desktop that used Intel's on-board RAID yesterday and it worked great. One nit though is I had to remember to kldload geom_raid manually from the shell before starting the install, and to load it from the loader on the first boot after install. The old ataraid(4) was p

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Edwin L. Culp W.
2012/5/7 Baptiste Daroussin > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > >>> Well for libre

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 12:22:21PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Hartmann, O.
On 05/07/12 11:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: >>> Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because >>> 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I nev

Re: Binary packages for LibreOffice 3.5 or 3.4

2012-05-07 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
On Mon, May 07, 2012 at 09:20:06AM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 07/05/2012 01:58 Baptiste Daroussin said the following: > > Well for libreoffice on freebsd clang is the official compiler, because > > 4.2.1 is just too old for libreoffice, and I never managed to make it built > > (the 3.5) with g